Every paper and every typed relationship, with the evidence behind each. For the readable account, go back to the map. This page is long on purpose: nothing is hidden, so your browser’s find will search every quote on it. To go straight to one paper, jump to a paper.
1Which papers shaped “dark energy”
Ranked by how often later work cites each paper for this term, not by how often it is cited overall. The first list is what the field built on. The second is where the meaning changed, and those papers are usually missing from the first list, because a paper that moves a term gets cited by the field it moved into, not by the one it left.
Most built onwhat later work leaned on for “dark energy”
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
Presents a new, advantageous parametrization w(a) = w_0+w_a(1-a) for the study of dark energy that reduces to linear behavior at low redshift, remains bounded at high redshift, and accurately reconstructs scalar field models like SUGRA to high precision even at the last scattering surface.
The paper proposes that cosmic acceleration can arise from gravity leaking into extra dimensions rather than from a dark energy component or cosmological constant, and shows that this mimics but is distinguishable from standard dark energy models with w_X > -1 via supernovae, Alcock-Paczynski, and CMB tests.
Presents first cosmological results from the ESSENCE survey constraining the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w with supernova data over redshift 0.15–0.70
Combines the new CfA3 SN Ia sample with literature samples (forming the 'Constitution' set) to produce improved, more precise constraints on the dark energy equation of state parameter w
Provides tight, robust constraints on the dark energy equation of state w=-0.97±0.10 for a constant dark energy equation of state by combining BAO, supernova, and WMAP5 data.
Turning pointsmoved the term’s meaning, even if few papers in this map cite them
Argues that a smoothly distributed, time-varying dark energy component is unphysical because it violates the equivalence principle, unlike prior 'smooth' xCDM treatments
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
★
2The 223 relationships between them
Each row is a typed relationship between two papers. Click a row to see the evidence.
●
both quotes were found word for word in the text this system pulled out of those papers.
○
one of them could not be found, so the relationship is marked inferred.
◌
the quotes have not been checked against those papers’ text as it now stands, so the relationship is marked not re-checked.
The same three marks stand beside each paper’s own passage, where they are about that passage alone: a passage marked ● can sit above a relationship marked ○.
1988
Cosmology and the fate of dilatation symmetry
arXiv:1711.03844Dynamical scalar field quintessence (cosmon/scaling field)
How it defines “dark energy”
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon […]. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 13
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2003 Phantom Energy: Dark Energy with<mml:math xmln…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
1996
A Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 14
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.65
→1998 Supernova Limits on the Cosmic Equation of Sta…
1996
Measurements of the Cosmological Parameters Ω and Λ from the First Seven Supernovae at<i>z</i>≥ 0.35
“Within Friedmann-Lemaître cosmological models,
the apparent bolometric magnitude m(z) of a standard candle (absolute
bolometric magnitude M) at a given redshift is a function of both the cosmological-constant energy density Ω_Λ≡Λ/(3H_0^2) and the mass density Ω_ M:”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 4
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.75
→Dark Energy and the Accelerating Universe
1997
Constraints on Cosmological Models from [ITAL]Hubble Space Telescope[/ITAL] Observations of High-[CLC][ITAL]z[/ITAL][/CLC] Supernovae
“The indication from our data is that the matter density is low; as shown in Figure 3,
either the Universe is open, or if flat, then a cosmological constant makes a
considerable contribution (which may be in conflict with limits from gravitational lensing
statistics (Kochanek 1996)).”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 2
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.75
→
1997
Cosmological Imprint of an Energy Component with General Equation of State
“This fifth contribution to the cosmic energy density, referred to here as “quintessence" or Q-component, is broadly defined, allowing a spectrum of possibilities including an equation-of-state which is constant, uniformly evolving or oscillatory.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 4
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
“A weakly coupled scalar field \Phi with a simple exponential potential
V=M_P^4exp(-\lambda\Phi/M_P) where M_P
is the reduced Planck mass, and \lambda > 2, has an
attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe
in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component,
contributing a fixed fraction \Omega_\phi (determined by \lambda) to
the energy density.”
○ the check ran against the text this system pulled out of this paper and could not find it · shown as inferred
What later work did with it · 7
narrowsrestricts to a special case○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→
1997
Exponential potentials and cosmological scaling solutions
arXiv:gr-qc/9711068Dynamical scalar field quintessence (cosmon/scaling field)
How it defines “dark energy”
“The most striking possibility is that a scalar field with an exponential potential could comprise a significant fraction of the energy density of our universe today.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 5
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
1998
Cluster Abundance Constraints for Cosmological Models with a Time‐varying, Spatially Inhomogeneous Energy Component with Negative Pressure
“we determine a general expression
for γ that applies to any models with a mixture of cold
dark matter plus cosmological constant or quintessence (a
time-evolving, spatially-inhomogeneous component with negative
pressure) including dependence on the spectral index n,
the Hubble constant h, and the equation-of-state of the quintessence
component w.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 3
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.68
“Quintessence […] has been proposed as the missing energy component that must
be added to the baryonic and
matter density in order to reach the critical density. […]
Quintessence is
a dynamical, slowly-evolving, spatially
inhomogeneous component with negative pressure.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 3
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2009 Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digi…
1998
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 20
extendsbuilds on / generalises○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2014 The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sam…
1998
Quintessence and the Rest of the World: Suppressing Long-Range Interactions
“Recently a number of pieces of evidence, especially
studies of the Hubble diagram for Type Ia supernovae […],
have lent support to the idea that the universe is dominated
by a smooth component with an effective negative pressure,
leading to an accelerating expansion.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 3
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.30
“Measurements of
the cosmic microwave background,
the mass power spectrum […], and,
most explicitly, the luminosity-red shift relation observed for
Type Ia supernovae […], all suggest that the missing energy should
possess negative pressure (p) and equation-of-state
(w ≡ p/ρ).”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 4
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
“Because the origin of the acceleration is unknown, we will refer to this
as the “X” component with a density of Ω_ x and equation of
state of P_ x =α_ xρ_ x. Caldwell, Dave, & Steinhardt (1998) have
dubbed the unknown component “quintessence” as the other four essences
have already been employed above.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 5
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.75
→2011 THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>CLUSTER SUPERN…
1998
The High‐Z Supernova Search: Measuring Cosmic Deceleration and Global Curvature of the Universe Using Type Ia Supernovae
“The CMB observations provide a nearly orthogonal set of parameters, so we will be
able to separate the effects of any exotic forms of matter-energy in the Universe from
normal matter.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 1
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 11
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2007 Disappearing cosmological constant in f(R) gra…
1999
The Cosmic Triangle: Revealing the State of the Universe
“Now, the mounting evidence described below
is forcing us to consider the possibility
that some cosmic dark energy exists that opposes the
self-attraction of
matter and is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 2
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
“We will be interested in this work in some dominant X-component, which can be described as
a perfect fluid with an equation of state specified by -1<w_X≡ p_X/ρ_X<-1/3,
thus enabling that component to induce accelerated expansion.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 4
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
“Increasing evidence suggests that most of the energy density of the universe
consists of a dark energy component with negative pressure, a “cosmological
constant" that causes the cosmic expansion to accelerate.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 1
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2003 Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Osc…
2000
Reconstruction of a Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in an Accelerating Universe
“strongly support
the existence of a new kind of matter in the Universe whose energy
density not only is positive but also dominates the energy densities
of all previously known forms of matter”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 1
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 4
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
“Parameters explored include those describing energy densities, including
the total energy density Ω_tot, the vacuum energy density
Ω_Λ, and the physical densities of baryons and cold dark
matter, Ω_b h^2 and Ω_c h^2 respectively.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 5
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2002 The cosmological constant and dark energy
2001
Accelerated universe from gravity leaking to extra dimensions
“Here, in addition to the matter and curvature contributions
we have included the density of a dark energy component Ω_X
with equation of state parameter w_X.
When w_X=-1, the dark energy acts in the same
way as a cosmological constant,
and the corresponding Ω_X will be denoted
as Ω_Λ in the following.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 4
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
“The discovery that the expansion of the universe is accelerating […] has promoted the search for new types of matter that can behave like a cosmological constant […] by combining positive energy density and negative pressure. This type of matter is often called ”quintessence”.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
“indicate that the Universe has a flat geometry and is
dominated at present by some form of dark energy with a negative pressure
(Garnavich et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999). The equation of state of
the dark energy, p_Q=w_Q ρ_Q, expresses the ratio between the
pressure, p_Q, and the mass density, ρ_Q, of the dark energy in
terms of the parameter w_Q (in units of c=1).”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
“An exotic form of matter
(cosmological constant or something similar) with an equation of
state p≈-ρ (that is, w ≈ -1) having a density parameter of about
Ω_Λ≈ 0.7 (marked by a filled circle in the figure).
The evidence for Ω_Λ will be discussed in section […].”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 1
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
“Our results include constraints on the neutrino mass (m_ν 0.3 eV),
equation of state of the
dark energy, and the tensor amplitude, as well as demonstrating the
effect of additional parameters on the base parameter constraints.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
“Observational evidence for accelerated
expansion informs us that there must
be a component with
a strongly negative EOS – “dark energy” – in addition to matter.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 8
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2011 THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>CLUSTER SUPERN…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
“There is significant observational evidence for the detection of
Einstein's cosmological constant, Λ, or a component of
the material content of the universe that varies only slowly with
time and space and so acts like Λ. We will use the term
dark energy for Λ or a component that acts like it.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 1
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
“in order to make Ω=1 one requires either (i) introduction of new
form of matter(energy): dark energy or (ii) modification of gravity in the
large, so that the total energy density is equal to the critical density,
which is required by theory (inflation) or by observation (WMAP).”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 5
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2010 f(R) Theories
2003
Can modified gravity explain accelerated cosmic expansion?
“Thus one concludes that the remaining 70% is some mysterious agent that creates the cosmological acceleration. The simplest suggestion is that the source of this acceleration is the vacuum energy (cosmological constant).”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter<i>w</i>be less than<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>−</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mi>?</mml:mi></mml:math>
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 11
contestsdisputes● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.65
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 8
extendsbuilds on / generalises○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2014 The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sam…
“Cosmic speed-up can be accommodated within general relativity by
invoking a mysterious cosmic fluid with large negative pressure,
dubbed dark energy.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
Phantom Energy: Dark Energy with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo><</mml:mo><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math>Causes a Cosmic Doomsday
“The dark energy is usually described by an “equation-of-state” parameter w≡ p/ρ, the ratio of the spatially-homogeneous dark-energy pressure p to its energy density ρ.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 6
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2006 Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminou…
2004
Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:math>forest and galaxy bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy
“A third theoretical prediction of departures from the standard model, and
one whose consequences would be particularly far reaching, is that
dark energy is not simply a cosmological constant introduced
already by Einstein, but something more complicated and dynamical in
nature.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 2
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
“We adopt an inflationary cold dark matter model dominated by a cosmological
constant, ΛCDM, with
Ω_m=0.4, Ω_Λ=0.6,
h≡ H_0/(100 km s^-1 Mpc^-1)=0.65,
and a primordial power spectrum index n=0.93.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
“Throughout the paper, we adopt the cosmological model assumed
in the Millennium simulation: a flat universe in which the density of cold dark
matter, baryons and dark energy (in units of the critical density),
have the values Ω_
b=0.045, Ω_ m=Ω_ CDM+Ω_ b=0.25 and
Ω_Λ =0.75 respectively”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present […],
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 7
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2010 f(R) Theories
2005
Properties of singularities in the (phantom) dark energy universe
“During the past two decades, the cold dark matter (CDM) model,
augmented with a dark energy field (which may take the form of a
cosmological constant `Λ'), has developed into the standard
theoretical paradigm for galaxy formation.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
“Surveys of cosmologically distant Type Ia supernovae […] indicated the presence of a
new, unaccounted-for “dark energy” that opposes the self-attraction
of matter and causes the expansion of the Universe to accelerate.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
“Baryon oscillations are clearly detected and provide a robust measurement of the comoving distance
to the median survey redshift z=0.35 independent of curvature and dark energy properties.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 3
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. […].”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 2
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2011 THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>CLUSTER SUPERN…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
2006
INTRODUCTION TO MODIFIED GRAVITY AND GRAVITATIONAL ALTERNATIVE FOR DARK ENERGY
“The dark energy problem (for recent review see […])
or, why current universe is expanding with the acceleration,
is considered to be the one of the most fundamental theoretical problems
of XXI century.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 13
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→
2007
Disappearing cosmological constant in f(R) gravity
“Continuing investigation of dark energy (DE) properties in the Universe
(see the recent review […] for the definitions of what is usually
called the effective DE energy density ρ_DE and pressure p_DE
from the observational point of view) has shown that its properties are
very close to those of an exact cosmological constant Λ that has
ρ_Λ= - p_Λ= Λ/8π G=const>0.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 1
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→SEVEN-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…
2007
Extended theories of gravity and their cosmological and astrophysical applications
“If combined with constraints coming
from galaxy clusters on the matter density parameter Ω_M,
these data indicate that the Universe is dominated by a
non-clustered fluid with negative pressure, generically dubbed
dark energy, which is able to drive the accelerated
expansion.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
arXiv:0803.0547Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
How it defines “dark energy”
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 1
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
FIRST-YEAR SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY-II SUPERNOVA RESULTS: HUBBLE DIAGRAM AND COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
arXiv:0908.4274Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
How it defines “dark energy”
“Cosmic acceleration
is most commonly attributed to a new energy-density
component known as dark energy
(for a review, see […]).
The recent SN measurements, in combination with measurements
of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in
galaxy clustering and of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
anisotropy, have provided increasingly
precise constraints on the density, Ω_ DE,
and equation of state parameter, w, of dark energy.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW CfA SUPERNOVA TYPE Ia LIGHT CURVES
arXiv:0901.4804Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
How it defines “dark energy”
“They have been the key element in the
discovery that the universe is accelerating and dominated by dark energy […]. Observational efforts
have moved beyond merely establishing the existence of dark energy and are
focused on determining its simplest properties. This is most often done in
terms of the equation of state, p = wρ, where the equation of state
parameter, w, relates the dark energy density, ρ, to the dark energy
pressure, p.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
SUPERNOVA CONSTRAINTS AND SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES FROM THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF THE SUPERNOVA LEGACY SURVEY
arXiv:1104.1443Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
How it defines “dark energy”
“The fundamental nature of dark energy, which makes up 3/4 of the mass-energy budget of the universe, remains almost completely mysterious. A solid measurement that w
≠
-1 (which would rule out the cosmological constant) would have
profound implications for cosmology and particle physics.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
What later work did with it · 1
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→Modified gravity and cosmology
2011
A 3% SOLUTION: DETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT WITH THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>AND WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3
arXiv:1103.2976Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
How it defines “dark energy”
“The improved measurement of
H_0, when combined with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)
7-year data, results in an improved constraint on the equation-of-state
parameter of dark energy of w = -1.08 ± 0.10.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>CLUSTER SUPERNOVA SURVEY. V. IMPROVING THE DARK-ENERGY CONSTRAINTS ABOVE<i>z</i>> 1 AND BUILDING AN EARLY-TYPE-HOSTED SUPERNOVA SAMPLE
arXiv:1105.3470Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
How it defines “dark energy”
“Fourteen of these pass our strict selection cuts
and are used in combination with the world's sample of to
derive the best current constraints on dark energy.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
arXiv:1212.5226Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
How it defines “dark energy”
“Despite its notable success at describing all current cosmological data sets, the standard model raises many questions: what is the nature of dark matter and dark energy?”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15
arXiv:1409.3242Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
How it defines “dark energy”
“This "fills the gap" in BAO distance ladder between previously measured local and higher redshift measurements, and affords significant improvement in constraining the properties of dark energy.”
○ the check ran against the text this system pulled out of this paper and could not find it · shown as inferred
A 2.4% DETERMINATION OF THE LOCAL VALUE OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT<sup>*</sup>
arXiv:1604.01424Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
How it defines “dark energy”
“A significant disagreement would provide evidence for fundamental physics beyond the standard model, such as time-dependent or early dark energy, gravitational physics beyond General Relativity, additional relativistic particles, or nonzero curvature.”
● found word for word in the text this system pulled out of this paper · shown as verified
Places new observational constraints on the equation of state parameter of the unknown dark energy component using an expanded Type Ia supernova sample
Provides a competitive, independent constraint on H0 using 6dFGS BAO measurements at low effective redshift, which can be combined with WMAP-7 to constrain the dark energy equation of state parameter w with reduced dependence on other cosmological parameters.
Proposes a modified gravity model L=R+R^m+1/R^n that unifies early-time inflation (via positive powers of curvature) and late-time cosmic acceleration (via negative powers of curvature) without invoking dark energy
1997 Cosmology with a primordial scaling fiel… (7)
The newer paper generalizes the cosmon/quintessence idea into a broader framework classifying dark energy by equation-of-state parameter, subsuming it as one case among several.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302506 (2003)from §Introduction
“The dark energy is usually described by an “equation-of-state” parameter w≡ p/ρ, the ratio of the spatially-homogeneous dark-energy pressure p to its energy density ρ.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Explores the consequences if dark energy is phantom energy with w<-1, leading to a 'Big Rip' cosmic doomsday scenario not previously considered in detail
Generalizes cosmological constraints on dark energy parameter space to include w<-1 phantom energy models
Derives the time-scale for dissociation of gravitationally bound systems (galaxy clusters, Milky Way, solar system, Earth, atoms, nuclei) due to phantom energy before the Big Rip
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper parameterizes dark energy generically via w(a), reducing the earlier dynamical scalar-field cosmon model to the special case w=-1 (cosmological constant) while citing it as historical motivation.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Cosmologists then explored the possibility that dark energy was dynamical, e.g., in a form of some light scalar field (Ford 1987; Wetterich 1988; Ratra & Peebles 1988; Peebles & Ratra 1988; Fujii & Nishioka 1990; Chiba et al. 1997; Caldwell et al. 1998; Copeland et al. 1998; Ferreira & Joyce 1998;…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2003 First‐Year <i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy P…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general dynamical scalar-field quintessence idea to an equation-of-state parametrization observationally constrained near w=-1, the cosmological-constant special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2003 Can the dark energy equation-of-state paramete…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier cosmon/quintessence model into a broader phenomenological framework using equation-of-state parameter w, including quintessence as a special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0301273 (2003)from §Introduction
“Cosmological observations strongly indicate that the universe is
dominated by a smoothly distributed, slowly varying dark energy component”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Investigates whether phantom dark energy models with w<-1, naively unstable due to negative kinetic terms, could be phenomenologically viable when treated as effective field theories valid only up to a momentum cutoff
Calculates the tree-level decay rate of a phantom particle into other phantoms and gravitons, showing it is naively infinite but can be rendered finite with a cutoff
Shows that under optimistic assumptions (approximate shift symmetry), the instability timescale can exceed the age of the universe only if the cutoff is at or below 100 MeV, providing a quantitative bound on viable phantom dark energy models
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
The newer paper generalizes the earlier cosmon/quintessence scalar field into a broader category of negative-pressure dark energy models, situating it among competing explanations like modified gravity.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“This situation is also similar in the context of dark energy – there is a degeneracy as for the potential of the scalar field (“quintessence” [111, 634, 267, 263, 615, 503, 257, 155]) due to the observational degeneracy to the dark energy equation of state around w = −1.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2002 The cosmological constant and dark energyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier cosmon/scaling field into a broader dark energy framework, citing it as an early dynamical example within that expanded concept.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Early examples are Weiss (1987) and Wetterich (1988).51 The former considers a quadratic potential with an ultralight effective mass, an idea that reappears in Frieman et al. (1995).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0207347 (2002)from §§ INTRODUCTION
“There is significant observational evidence for the detection of
Einstein's cosmological constant, Λ, or a component of
the material content of the universe that varies only slowly with
time and space and so acts like Λ. We will use the term
dark energy for Λ or a component that acts like it.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper reviews and synthesizes the physics, astronomy, and history of ideas about the cosmological constant/dark energy, assessing the observational evidence and recent developments in searching for a fundamental theory since Weinberg's 1989 review.
It discusses the possibility that dark energy is dynamical, evolving toward zero, as an approach to alleviate the fine-tuning problem of the cosmological constant.
It provides an explicit example (zero-point energy of the 3K background radiation) quantifying the magnitude of the cosmological constant problem.
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2008 Dark Energy and the Accelerating UniverseNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier cosmon/quintessence field into a broader negative-pressure dark energy framework encompassing scalar fields, vacuum energy, and modified gravity models.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The energy associated with the vacuum can be positive, negative, or zero.
effectively dynamical (Wetterich 1988; Ratra & Peebles 1988; Frieman et al. 1995; Zlatev, Wang & Steinhardt 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0982 (2008)from §Introduction
“The first is that 75%
of the energy density of the Universe exists in a new form with
large negative pressure, called dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Broadly reviews cosmic acceleration for the astronomy community, synthesizing observational evidence (SNe, CMB, LSS, clusters, weak lensing) and theoretical approaches (cosmological constant problem, dark energy models, modified gravity) into a unified treatment
Provides updated review of dark energy phenomenology and equation-of-state parameterizations (w0-wa) and their observational discrimination
Frames the deceleration/acceleration condition (p < -
ho/3, w<-1/3) as the defining property of dark energy
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.65
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier cosmon quintessence model into a broader category of negative-pressure dark energy encompassing multiple dynamical and constant forms.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2000 The Cosmological ConstantNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper subsumes the cosmon/quintessence scalar field as one special case within a broader generic negative-pressure dark energy framework, citing it merely as an example model.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The simplest physical model for an appropriate dark energy component is a single slowly-rolling scalar field, sometimes referred to as “quintessence” [74, 266, 189, 208, 267, 120, 94, 92, 91, 86, 43, 132].”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2002 Cosmological constant—the weight of the vacuumNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier dynamical scalar field concept into a broader negative-pressure dark energy framework encompassing both constant and dynamical forms.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0212290 (2002)from §Framework of standard cosmol…
“An exotic form of matter
(cosmological constant or something similar) with an equation of
state p≈-ρ (that is, w ≈ -1) having a density parameter of about
Ω_Λ≈ 0.7 (marked by a filled circle in the figure).
The evidence for Ω_Λ will be discussed in section <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The review explicitly generalizes 'cosmological constant' to include time-varying dark energy scenarios ('we shall use the term cosmological constant in a generalized sense including the scenarios in which cosmological "constant" is actually varying in time')
Provides a unified conceptual treatment linking dark energy to scalar field models (quintessence, tachyonic fields) and to the two distinct 'cosmological constant problems' (smallness and coincidence)
Synthesizes cosmological constant/dark energy discussion with de Sitter thermodynamics, string theory landscape, and relaxation mechanisms as a coherent review
contestsdisputes● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2003 Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational ph…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper proposes a gravitational alternative (R^n corrections) explicitly to eliminate the need for the dynamical scalar field/dark energy fluid, disputing its necessity.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ contests
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0306438 (2003)from §Introduction
“Cosmic speed-up can be accommodated within general relativity by
invoking a mysterious cosmic fluid with large negative pressure,
dubbed dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that tiny R^n (n<0) corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action can produce cosmic acceleration, eliminating the need for dark energy as a separate fluid component
Provides a unified purely gravitational origin for both early-time inflation (R^n, n>0) and late-time acceleration (R^n, n<0), avoiding invocation of dark energy or an inflaton field
Identifies self-accelerating vacuum solutions (de Sitter and anti-de Sitter) as alternatives to a cosmological constant, with effective equation-of-state parameters mimicking dark energy (w_DE=-1 or w_DE<-2/3) without actual dark energy
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the dynamical scalar field concept to a simple equation-of-state parameterization, treating dark energy as a constrained observational quantity rather than a full dynamical field model.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0586 (2008)from §Table of Cosmological parame…
“w Dark energy equation of state, w= p_DE/ρ_DE”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The five-year data improve constraints on cosmological parameters including dark energy equation of state, with the neutrino mass limit robust to within 10% to a varying dark energy equation of state.
Ω_Λ= 0.742±0.030 is measured with improved precision compared to three-year data.
The paper considers extended models with a constant dark energy equation of state w, bounded by w>-2.5, as part of testing extensions beyond simple ΛCDM.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper treats the scalar field cosmon as one special case within a broader review of the cosmological constant explaining acceleration, restricting scope.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1711.03844 (1988)from §Introduction
“If the dilaton fulfills these three conditions it is called a cosmon <cit.>. Its dynamics drives the cosmological constant to zero.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Formulates three necessary conditions ('cosmon conditions') on the dynamics of the dilaton for a realistic cosmology, including that the trace anomaly vanish and be purely anomalous at the static vacuum value.
Establishes a connection between the 'cosmon condition' and the short-distance renormalization-group behavior of the underlying fundamental theory, showing the trace anomaly for static configurations equals μ∂V/∂μ.
Proposes an anomalous renormalization group equation for the cosmological 'constant' (μ∂V/∂μ = A V) leading to a cosmological constant that evolves with time (V_0 ~ (m/χ)^A χ^4), generalizing earlier work where φ̃ rather than φ̃/χ was held fixed.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
The newer paper generalizes vacuum energy/cosmological constant into a broader unknown negative-pressure X-component, extending the earlier narrower parameter concept.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9806396 (1998)from §ANALYSIS
“Because the origin of the acceleration is unknown, we will refer to this
as the “X” component with a density of Ω_ x and equation of
state of P_ x =α_ xρ_ x. Caldwell, Dave, & Steinhardt (1998) have
dubbed the unknown component “quintessence” as the other four essences
have already been employed above.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Places new observational constraints on the equation of state parameter of the unknown dark energy component using an expanded Type Ia supernova sample
Rules out topological defects (strings, textures) and disfavors domain walls as the dominant dark energy component at high confidence
Combines supernova data with CMB first acoustic peak measurements to jointly constrain matter density and the unknown energy component, providing evidence for a flat universe
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2006 Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminou…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes vacuum energy/cosmological constant into a dark energy component with an equation-of-state parameter w, extending the earlier fixed-parameter treatment.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0608632 (2006)from §Abstract
“Baryon oscillations are clearly detected and provide a robust measurement of the comoving distance
to the median survey redshift z=0.35 independent of curvature and dark energy properties.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Sharpens curvature constraint from WMAP alone (Ω_tot=1.05±0.05) to Ω_tot=1.003±0.010 using LRG power spectrum
Provides a measurement of the equation of state parameter w=-0.94±0.09 assuming flatness, independent of nonlinear scale complications
Demonstrates that baryon oscillation distance measurement to z=0.35 is robust and independent of assumptions about dark energy properties
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2003 First‐Year<i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Pr…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the vacuum energy/cosmological constant into a dynamic dark energy component with an equation-of-state parameter w, broadening the earlier fixed-parameter treatment.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302218 (2003)from §§.§.§ Reparameterization
“w is the equation of state of the dark energy component, Ω=Ω_m+Ω_Λ and the radiation density parameter”
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes vacuum energy from a fixed cosmological constant parameter into a dynamical dark energy equation-of-state framework, building on tools like CAMB from the earlier work.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“We acknowledge use of the HEALPix (Gorski et al. 2005), CAMB (Lewis et al. 2000), and CMBFAST (Seljak & Zaldarriaga 1996) packages.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2003 First‐Year <i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy P…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier vacuum energy parameter by adding an equation-of-state formalism and observational constraints, generalizing its treatment.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2010 SEVEN-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes vacuum energy from a fixed background parameter into a dynamical equation-of-state component (w0, wa), building on tools like CAMB used in the earlier work.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“We acknowledge use of the HEALPix (Gorski et al. 2005), CAMB (Lewis et al. 2000), and CMBFAST (Seljak & Zaldarriaga 1996) packages.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2005 Simulations of the formation, evolution and cl…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier 'vacuum energy' parameter into a dynamical dark energy field with an equation of state, building on the cosmological constant concept.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0504097 (2005)from §Main text (introduction)
“During the past two decades, the cold dark matter (CDM) model,
augmented with a dark energy field (which may take the form of a
cosmological constant `Λ'), has developed into the standard
theoretical paradigm for galaxy formation.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryon-induced features in the initial conditions are reflected in distorted form in the low-redshift galaxy distribution, an effect that can be used to constrain the nature of dark energy with next generation surveys.
Shows for the first time that baryon-induced oscillations detected in the CMB power spectrum survive in distorted form not only in the nonlinear dark matter power spectrum but also in realistically selected galaxy samples at 0<z<3, providing a basis for future surveys to constrain the equation of state of dark energy.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2005 Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the L…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on CMBfast's vacuum energy parameterization by using it as a tool while generalizing dark energy to an unknown equation-of-state probed via geometric distance measurements.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“We use CMBfast (Seljak & Zaldarriaga 1996; Zaldarriaga et al. 1998; Zaldarriaga & Seljak 2000) to compute the linear power spectra, which we convert to correlation functions with a Fourier transform.”
“For a general cosmology, we begin from the CMBfast linear power spectrum.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.68
→2002 Cosmological parameters from CMB and other dat…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier simple vacuum-energy parameter into a broader equation-of-state framework, jointly constraining it with other parameters via MCMC methods.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0205436 (2002)from §Abstract
“Our results include constraints on the neutrino mass (m_ν 0.3 eV),
equation of state of the
dark energy, and the tensor amplitude, as well as demonstrating the
effect of additional parameters on the base parameter constraints.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates a fast MCMC approach that allows joint constraints on dark energy equation of state w alongside many other cosmological parameters (6, 9, and 11 parameter analyses) with modest additional computational cost.
Uses importance sampling to incorporate new data (e.g., 2dF, CBI) and assess consistency of datasets when constraining dark energy and other parameters.
Provides both marginalized and full n-dimensional confidence limits on w, showing how the constraint on dark energy equation of state changes when allowing curvature and quintessence perturbations.
extendsbuilds on / generalises○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→1997 Cosmology with a primordial scaling fieldDynamical scalar field quintessence (cosmon/scaling field)
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the static cosmological-constant vacuum energy into a dynamical scalar field that can mimic it, broadening the earlier fixed parameter concept.time and.parameter treatment.throughout.field.evolution.trials.range.trends— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9711102 (1997)from §Abstract
“A weakly coupled scalar field \Phi with a simple exponential potential
V=M_P^4exp(-\lambda\Phi/M_P) where M_P
is the reduced Planck mass, and \lambda > 2, has an
attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe
in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component,
contributing a fixed fraction \Omega_\phi (determined by \lambda) to
the ener…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The model provides an attractor solution for the scalar field's contribution to the energy density that does not require tuning an energy scale characteristic of late times, unlike other scalar-field (dark-energy-like) cosmologies.
Because the solution is a true dynamical attractor, it avoids the fine-tuning problems inherent in cosmological-constant and other decaying-cosmological-constant models.
The required exponential potential and the specific λ value needed for structure formation arise naturally in particle physics theories (e.g., Kaluza-Klein compactifications, supergravity/superstring models), giving a theoretically motivated rather than ad hoc dark-energy-like component.
+1 more
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
renamessame idea, new name● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2003 First‐Year <i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy P…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
Both treat dark energy as a background cosmological constant parameter; the newer paper uses 'dark energy equation of state' terminology instead of 'vacuum energy' for essentially the same fixed-parameter role.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“We have modified CMBFAST (Seljak & Zaldarriaga 1996) accordingly to match the same convention.”
“We thank Uroš Seljak for his help with modifications to CMBFAST.”
“For this section, since this model predicts sharp features in the angular power spectrum, we had to modify the standard CMBFAST splining resolution, splining at ∆l = 1 for 2 ≤ l 50 and ∆l = 5 for l ≥ 50.”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ renames
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302225 (2003)from §Determining the power spectr…
“The priors on the model are: a flat universe, a cosmological constant
equation of state for the dark energy, and a restriction of
τ<0.3.”
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier vacuum energy parameter by adding an equation-of-state formalism and constraining it with observational data.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0586 (2008)from §Table of Cosmological parame…
“w Dark energy equation of state, w= p_DE/ρ_DE”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The five-year data improve constraints on cosmological parameters including dark energy equation of state, with the neutrino mass limit robust to within 10% to a varying dark energy equation of state.
Ω_Λ= 0.742±0.030 is measured with improved precision compared to three-year data.
The paper considers extended models with a constant dark energy equation of state w, bounded by w>-2.5, as part of testing extensions beyond simple ΛCDM.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.65
→2004 Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes vacuum energy/cosmological constant into a broader dark energy framework with a time-dependent equation of state, extending the earlier fixed-parameter treatment.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0407372 (2004)from §Introduction
“A third theoretical prediction of departures from the standard model, and
one whose consequences would be particularly far reaching, is that
dark energy is not simply a cosmological constant introduced
already by Einstein, but something more complicated and dynamical in
nature.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We explore dark energy constraints in models with a fairly general time dependence of dark energy equation of state, finding Ω_λ=0.72± 0.02, w(z=0.3)=-0.98^+0.10_-0.12
One method to constrain the nature of dark energy that has not attracted much attention, yet has the potential to produce results on a relatively short time scale, is comparing measurements of amplitude of fluctuations at high redshift from the Lyα forest and CMB to that at low redshift from galaxy clustering.
We find no evidence for variation of the equation of state with redshift, w(z=1)=-1.03^+0.21_-0.28.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2012 NINE-YEAR <i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier vacuum energy parameter into a full dark energy equation-of-state framework (w0, wa) constrained by multiple datasets, building on CAMB's earlier treatment.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“We acknowledge use of the HEALPix (Gorski et al. 2005), CAMB (Lewis et al. 2000), and CMBFAST (Seljak & Zaldarriaga 1996) packages.”
“CAMB
Model power spectra are computed using the Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background (CAMB, Lewis et al. 2000), which is based on the earlier code CMBFAST (Seljak & Zaldarriaga 1996).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9603033 (1996)from §CALCULATIONAL TECHNIQUES
“These include models with varying amount of
dark matter, baryonic matter, Hubble constant, vacuum energy,
neutrino mass, shape of initial spectrum of perturbations, reionization
and tensor modes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1212.5226 (2012)from §Introduction
“Despite its notable success at describing all current cosmological data sets, the standard model raises many questions: what is the nature of dark matter and dark energy?”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Nine-year WMAP data combined with high-l CMB, BAO, and H0 determine Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, and Ω_Λ each to ~1.5% precision
Restricting supernova data use to models examining the dark energy equation of state due to residual systematic errors in SN samples
Updated methodology for combining WMAP with SPT/ACT/BAO/H0/SNe to constrain dark energy equation of state parameters (w, w0, wa) more tightly than previous WMAP releases
The newer paper generalizes the earlier cosmological-constant/Ω_Λ framework into a broader dark-energy concept with equation-of-state parameter and multiple theoretical models, citing the same supernova evidence.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“CDM: analyses of the statistics of lensed quasars (Kochanek 1996) and of the first seven high-redshift supernovae of the Supernova Cosmology Project (Perlmutter et al. 1997) indicated that '!”
“Two teams working independently in the mid- to late 1990s, the Supernova Cosmology Project and the High-z Supernova Search, took advantage of these breakthroughs to measure the supernova Hubble diagram to much larger distances than was previously possible.”
“F or
p er
so na
l u se
o nl
y.
Supernova Cosmology Project
34
36
38
40
42
44 High-z Supernova Team
High-redshift (z 0.15) SNe:
Calan-Tololo Supernova search CfA and other Supernova follow up
Low-redshift (z 0.15) SNe:
–0.5
–1.0
0
∆ (m
–”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9608192 (1996)from §MEASUREMENT OF Ω_Λ VERSUS Ω_…
“Within Friedmann-Lemaître cosmological models,
the apparent bolometric magnitude m(z) of a standard candle (absolute
bolometric magnitude M) at a given redshift is a function of both the cosmological-constant energy density Ω_Λ≡Λ/(3H_0^2) and the mass density Ω_ M:”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
First systematic technique to discover and measure high-redshift Type Ia supernovae in batches to constrain Ω_M and Ω_Λ independently
Presents the first joint confidence region on the Ω_M–Ω_Λ plane from high-redshift supernovae rather than relying solely on the deceleration parameter q_0
Notes that alternative energy density components (e.g., topological defects, per Steinhardt 1996) could in principle affect the luminosity-distance relation differently than a simple cosmological constant, though this paper does not address such models due to limited redshift range
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0982 (2008)from §Introduction
“The first is that 75%
of the energy density of the Universe exists in a new form with
large negative pressure, called dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Broadly reviews cosmic acceleration for the astronomy community, synthesizing observational evidence (SNe, CMB, LSS, clusters, weak lensing) and theoretical approaches (cosmological constant problem, dark energy models, modified gravity) into a unified treatment
Provides updated review of dark energy phenomenology and equation-of-state parameterizations (w0-wa) and their observational discrimination
Frames the deceleration/acceleration condition (p < -
ho/3, w<-1/3) as the defining property of dark energy
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2000 The Cosmological ConstantNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier cosmological-constant-as-energy-density framework by adding physical mechanism (negative pressure), particle-physics origins, and broader observational evidence for acceleration.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9608192 (1996)from §MEASUREMENT OF Ω_Λ VERSUS Ω_…
“Within Friedmann-Lemaître cosmological models,
the apparent bolometric magnitude m(z) of a standard candle (absolute
bolometric magnitude M) at a given redshift is a function of both the cosmological-constant energy density Ω_Λ≡Λ/(3H_0^2) and the mass density Ω_ M:”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
First systematic technique to discover and measure high-redshift Type Ia supernovae in batches to constrain Ω_M and Ω_Λ independently
Presents the first joint confidence region on the Ω_M–Ω_Λ plane from high-redshift supernovae rather than relying solely on the deceleration parameter q_0
Notes that alternative energy density components (e.g., topological defects, per Steinhardt 1996) could in principle affect the luminosity-distance relation differently than a simple cosmological constant, though this paper does not address such models due to limited redshift range
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2005 The Supernova Legacy Survey: measurement of $\…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader negative-pressure dark energy component with variable equation-of-state parameter w, building on the earlier Ω_Λ framework.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The stretch factors is similar to that described in Perlmutter et al. (1997): it parameterizes the brighter-slower relation, originally described in Phillips (1993), by stretching the time axis ofa unique light-curve template;s = 1 is defined in rest-frameB for the time interval−15 to+35 days using…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9608192 (1996)from §MEASUREMENT OF Ω_Λ VERSUS Ω_…
“Within Friedmann-Lemaître cosmological models,
the apparent bolometric magnitude m(z) of a standard candle (absolute
bolometric magnitude M) at a given redshift is a function of both the cosmological-constant energy density Ω_Λ≡Λ/(3H_0^2) and the mass density Ω_ M:”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
First systematic technique to discover and measure high-redshift Type Ia supernovae in batches to constrain Ω_M and Ω_Λ independently
Presents the first joint confidence region on the Ω_M–Ω_Λ plane from high-redshift supernovae rather than relying solely on the deceleration parameter q_0
Notes that alternative energy density components (e.g., topological defects, per Steinhardt 1996) could in principle affect the luminosity-distance relation differently than a simple cosmological constant, though this paper does not address such models due to limited redshift range
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0510447 (2005)from §Introduction
“Surveys of cosmologically distant Type Ia supernovae
<cit.> indicated the presence of a
new, unaccounted-for “dark energy” that opposes the self-attraction
of matter and causes the expansion of the Universe to accelerate.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents distance measurements to 71 high redshift Type Ia supernovae from the first year of SNLS with improved systematic control
Provides cosmological fits yielding w = -1.023 ± 0.090 (stat) ± 0.054 (sys) for a flat cosmology with constant equation of state combined with SDSS baryon acoustic oscillation constraints
Claims improved systematic uncertainty control via single-instrument, multi-band photometry compared to traditional multi-telescope SN surveys
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→1998 Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an …Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier cosmological-constant/energy-density framework, adding the negative-pressure interpretation explaining accelerated expansion measured via SNe Ia.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“While some comparison with the stated results of the Supernova Cosmology Project (Perlmutter et al. is possible, an informed1995, 1997, 1998) combination of the data will have to await a similarly detailed description of their measurements.”
“…the discussion from results limited principally by statistical errors to those limited by our depth of understanding of SNe Ia.
Published high-redshift SN Ia data are a small fraction of the data in hand both for our team and for the Supernova Cosmology Project (Perlmutter et al. 1995, 1997, 1998).”
“Application of large-format CCDs and sophisticated image analysis techniques by the Supernova Cosmology Project et al. led to the discovery of SN(Perlmutter 1995) 1992bi (z \ 0.46), followed by six more SNe Ia at z B 0.4 et al. Employing a correction for the(Perlmutter 1997). luminosity/light curve shape relation (but none for host galaxy extinction), compar…”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9608192 (1996)from §MEASUREMENT OF Ω_Λ VERSUS Ω_…
“Within Friedmann-Lemaître cosmological models,
the apparent bolometric magnitude m(z) of a standard candle (absolute
bolometric magnitude M) at a given redshift is a function of both the cosmological-constant energy density Ω_Λ≡Λ/(3H_0^2) and the mass density Ω_ M:”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
First systematic technique to discover and measure high-redshift Type Ia supernovae in batches to constrain Ω_M and Ω_Λ independently
Presents the first joint confidence region on the Ω_M–Ω_Λ plane from high-redshift supernovae rather than relying solely on the deceleration parameter q_0
Notes that alternative energy density components (e.g., topological defects, per Steinhardt 1996) could in principle affect the luminosity-distance relation differently than a simple cosmological constant, though this paper does not address such models due to limited redshift range
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
2000 ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTE…
The X-component with variable w generalizes the fixed cosmological constant (w=-1) into a broader negative-pressure fluid class driving acceleration.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9710123 (1997)from §Discussion
“The indication from our data is that the matter density is low; as shown in Figure 3,
either the Universe is open, or if flat, then a cosmological constant makes a
considerable contribution (which may be in conflict with limits from gravitational lensing
statistics (Kochanek 1996)).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Combines HST and ground-based photometry of high-z SNe Ia to derive luminosity distances accurate to 10-20%, allowing joint constraints on Ω_m and Ω_Λ
First use of HST imaging to cleanly separate SN light from host galaxy for high-z SN Ia photometry, improving light curve precision
Demonstrates that matter density alone (Ω_m) is insufficient for a flat universe at >95% confidence, implying a nonzero cosmological constant contribution is needed for flatness
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 (2000)from §Introduction
“We will be interested in this work in some dominant X-component, which can be described as
a perfect fluid with an equation of state specified by -1<w_X≡ p_X/ρ_X<-1/3,
thus enabling that component to induce accelerated expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We find all the critical points of the system for constant equations of state in that range.
We consider further several background quantities that can distinguish the models with different w_X values.
Using a simple toy model with a varying equation of state, we show that even a large variation of w_X at small redshifts is very difficult to observe with d_L(z) measurements up to z∼1.
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.65
→2000 The Cosmological ConstantNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier Ω_Λ energy-density concept by adding physical interpretation (negative pressure, particle-physics origin) and observational evidence for acceleration.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9710123 (1997)from §Discussion
“The indication from our data is that the matter density is low; as shown in Figure 3,
either the Universe is open, or if flat, then a cosmological constant makes a
considerable contribution (which may be in conflict with limits from gravitational lensing
statistics (Kochanek 1996)).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Combines HST and ground-based photometry of high-z SNe Ia to derive luminosity distances accurate to 10-20%, allowing joint constraints on Ω_m and Ω_Λ
First use of HST imaging to cleanly separate SN light from host galaxy for high-z SN Ia photometry, improving light curve precision
Demonstrates that matter density alone (Ω_m) is insufficient for a flat universe at >95% confidence, implying a nonzero cosmological constant contribution is needed for flatness
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper treats dark energy generically but constrains w tightly toward -1, effectively specializing the earlier dynamical quintessence framework toward the cosmological-constant case.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…the possibility that dark energy was dynamical, e.g., in a form of some light scalar field (Ford 1987; Wetterich 1988; Ratra & Peebles 1988; Peebles & Ratra 1988; Fujii & Nishioka 1990; Chiba et al. 1997; Caldwell et al. 1998; Copeland et al. 1998; Ferreira & Joyce 1998; Zlatev et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9708069 (1997)from §Introduction
“This fifth contribution to the cosmic energy density, referred to here as “quintessence" or Q-component, is broadly defined, allowing a spectrum of possibilities including an equation-of-state which is constant, uniformly evolving or oscillatory.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Argues that a smoothly distributed, time-varying dark energy component is unphysical because it violates the equivalence principle, unlike prior 'smooth' xCDM treatments
Shows that including fluctuations in the Q-component breaks the near-degeneracy with ΛCDM found when the component is treated as spatially smooth
Computes CMB anisotropy and mass power spectra for a wide, representative class of quintessence models including scalar field potentials (exponential, cosine) with self-consistent fluctuations
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2003 First‐Year <i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy P…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general time-varying quintessence w(-1<w<0) to observational constraints favoring w≈-1, a special cosmological-constant case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9708069 (1997)from §Introduction
“This fifth contribution to the cosmic energy density, referred to here as “quintessence" or Q-component, is broadly defined, allowing a spectrum of possibilities including an equation-of-state which is constant, uniformly evolving or oscillatory.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Argues that a smoothly distributed, time-varying dark energy component is unphysical because it violates the equivalence principle, unlike prior 'smooth' xCDM treatments
Shows that including fluctuations in the Q-component breaks the near-degeneracy with ΛCDM found when the component is treated as spatially smooth
Computes CMB anisotropy and mass power spectra for a wide, representative class of quintessence models including scalar field potentials (exponential, cosine) with self-consistent fluctuations
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2005 Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the L…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes quintessence's dynamical w(z) into a broader 'dark energy' framework, using observational probes to constrain the equation-of-state parameter.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“If one generalizes to larger parameter spaces, e.g., adding an unknown dark energy equation of state w(z) (Turner &White 1997; Caldwell et al. 1998) or a non-zero curvature, then a parameter degeneracy opens in the CMB (e.g, Eisenstein, Hu, & Tegmark 1998; Efstathiou & Bond 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9708069 (1997)from §Introduction
“This fifth contribution to the cosmic energy density, referred to here as “quintessence" or Q-component, is broadly defined, allowing a spectrum of possibilities including an equation-of-state which is constant, uniformly evolving or oscillatory.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Argues that a smoothly distributed, time-varying dark energy component is unphysical because it violates the equivalence principle, unlike prior 'smooth' xCDM treatments
Shows that including fluctuations in the Q-component breaks the near-degeneracy with ΛCDM found when the component is treated as spatially smooth
Computes CMB anisotropy and mass power spectra for a wide, representative class of quintessence models including scalar field potentials (exponential, cosine) with self-consistent fluctuations
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
contestsdisputes● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper favors the cosmological constant explanation over the earlier dynamical quintessence alternative, treating them as competing models for cosmic acceleration.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9708069 (1997)from §Introduction
“This fifth contribution to the cosmic energy density, referred to here as “quintessence" or Q-component, is broadly defined, allowing a spectrum of possibilities including an equation-of-state which is constant, uniformly evolving or oscillatory.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Argues that a smoothly distributed, time-varying dark energy component is unphysical because it violates the equivalence principle, unlike prior 'smooth' xCDM treatments
Shows that including fluctuations in the Q-component breaks the near-degeneracy with ΛCDM found when the component is treated as spatially smooth
Computes CMB anisotropy and mass power spectra for a wide, representative class of quintessence models including scalar field potentials (exponential, cosine) with self-consistent fluctuations
+2 more
↓ contests
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper reduces the earlier dynamical scalar-field dark energy to a phenomenological constant equation-of-state parameter, treating w=-1 as a special observationally-tested case.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…the possibility that dark energy was dynamical, e.g., in a form of some light scalar field (Ford 1987; Wetterich 1988; Ratra & Peebles 1988; Peebles & Ratra 1988; Fujii & Nishioka 1990; Chiba et al. 1997; Caldwell et al. 1998; Copeland et al. 1998; Ferreira & Joyce 1998; Zlatev et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9711102 (1997)from §Abstract
“A weakly coupled scalar field \Phi with a simple exponential potential
V=M_P^4exp(-\lambda\Phi/M_P) where M_P
is the reduced Planck mass, and \lambda > 2, has an
attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe
in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component,
contributing a fixed fraction \Omega_\phi (determined by \lambda) to
the ener…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The model provides an attractor solution for the scalar field's contribution to the energy density that does not require tuning an energy scale characteristic of late times, unlike other scalar-field (dark-energy-like) cosmologies.
Because the solution is a true dynamical attractor, it avoids the fine-tuning problems inherent in cosmological-constant and other decaying-cosmological-constant models.
The required exponential potential and the specific λ value needed for structure formation arise naturally in particle physics theories (e.g., Kaluza-Klein compactifications, supergravity/superstring models), giving a theoretically motivated rather than ad hoc dark-energy-like component.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
extendsbuilds on / generalises○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2002 The cosmological constant and dark energyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier scalar-field quintessence model into a broader dark energy framework encompassing dynamical, evolving negative-pressure components beyond the specific scaling field.confidence— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“52 For recent discussions of this model see Ferreira and Joyce (1998), Ott (2001), Hwang and Noh (2001), and references therein.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9711102 (1997)from §Abstract
“A weakly coupled scalar field \Phi with a simple exponential potential
V=M_P^4exp(-\lambda\Phi/M_P) where M_P
is the reduced Planck mass, and \lambda > 2, has an
attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe
in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component,
contributing a fixed fraction \Omega_\phi (determined by \lambda) to
the ener…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The model provides an attractor solution for the scalar field's contribution to the energy density that does not require tuning an energy scale characteristic of late times, unlike other scalar-field (dark-energy-like) cosmologies.
Because the solution is a true dynamical attractor, it avoids the fine-tuning problems inherent in cosmological-constant and other decaying-cosmological-constant models.
The required exponential potential and the specific λ value needed for structure formation arise naturally in particle physics theories (e.g., Kaluza-Klein compactifications, supergravity/superstring models), giving a theoretically motivated rather than ad hoc dark-energy-like component.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0207347 (2002)from §§ INTRODUCTION
“There is significant observational evidence for the detection of
Einstein's cosmological constant, Λ, or a component of
the material content of the universe that varies only slowly with
time and space and so acts like Λ. We will use the term
dark energy for Λ or a component that acts like it.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper reviews and synthesizes the physics, astronomy, and history of ideas about the cosmological constant/dark energy, assessing the observational evidence and recent developments in searching for a fundamental theory since Weinberg's 1989 review.
It discusses the possibility that dark energy is dynamical, evolving toward zero, as an approach to alleviate the fine-tuning problem of the cosmological constant.
It provides an explicit example (zero-point energy of the 3K background radiation) quantifying the magnitude of the cosmological constant problem.
+1 more
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
extendsbuilds on / generalises○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier scalar-field quintessence model into a general negative-pressure dark energy category encompassing quintessence and other alternatives.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9711102 (1997)from §Abstract
“A weakly coupled scalar field \Phi with a simple exponential potential
V=M_P^4exp(-\lambda\Phi/M_P) where M_P
is the reduced Planck mass, and \lambda > 2, has an
attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe
in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component,
contributing a fixed fraction \Omega_\phi (determined by \lambda) to
the ener…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The model provides an attractor solution for the scalar field's contribution to the energy density that does not require tuning an energy scale characteristic of late times, unlike other scalar-field (dark-energy-like) cosmologies.
Because the solution is a true dynamical attractor, it avoids the fine-tuning problems inherent in cosmological-constant and other decaying-cosmological-constant models.
The required exponential potential and the specific λ value needed for structure formation arise naturally in particle physics theories (e.g., Kaluza-Klein compactifications, supergravity/superstring models), giving a theoretically motivated rather than ad hoc dark-energy-like component.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
narrowsrestricts to a special case○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2000 The Cosmological ConstantNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper treats dark energy generically as a negative-pressure component (cosmological constant-like), citing the earlier scalar-field scaling model as one specific mechanistic special case among many quintessence proposals.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The simplest physical model for an appropriate dark energy component is a single slowly-rolling scalar field, sometimes referred to as “quintessence” [74, 266, 189, 208, 267, 120, 94, 92, 91, 86, 43, 132].”
“To date, investigations have focused on scaling or tracker models of quintessence, in which the scalar field energy density can parallel that of matter or radiation, at least for part of its history [86, 62, 279, 158, 232, 278, 219].”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9711102 (1997)from §Abstract
“A weakly coupled scalar field \Phi with a simple exponential potential
V=M_P^4exp(-\lambda\Phi/M_P) where M_P
is the reduced Planck mass, and \lambda > 2, has an
attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe
in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component,
contributing a fixed fraction \Omega_\phi (determined by \lambda) to
the ener…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The model provides an attractor solution for the scalar field's contribution to the energy density that does not require tuning an energy scale characteristic of late times, unlike other scalar-field (dark-energy-like) cosmologies.
Because the solution is a true dynamical attractor, it avoids the fine-tuning problems inherent in cosmological-constant and other decaying-cosmological-constant models.
The required exponential potential and the specific λ value needed for structure formation arise naturally in particle physics theories (e.g., Kaluza-Klein compactifications, supergravity/superstring models), giving a theoretically motivated rather than ad hoc dark-energy-like component.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
extendsbuilds on / generalises○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2002 Cosmological constant—the weight of the vacuumNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier scaling-field quintessence into a broader negative-pressure dark energy framework encompassing both cosmological constant and dynamical forms.value.value.value.value.value.value.value.value.value.value— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9711102 (1997)from §Abstract
“A weakly coupled scalar field \Phi with a simple exponential potential
V=M_P^4exp(-\lambda\Phi/M_P) where M_P
is the reduced Planck mass, and \lambda > 2, has an
attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe
in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component,
contributing a fixed fraction \Omega_\phi (determined by \lambda) to
the ener…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The model provides an attractor solution for the scalar field's contribution to the energy density that does not require tuning an energy scale characteristic of late times, unlike other scalar-field (dark-energy-like) cosmologies.
Because the solution is a true dynamical attractor, it avoids the fine-tuning problems inherent in cosmological-constant and other decaying-cosmological-constant models.
The required exponential potential and the specific λ value needed for structure formation arise naturally in particle physics theories (e.g., Kaluza-Klein compactifications, supergravity/superstring models), giving a theoretically motivated rather than ad hoc dark-energy-like component.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0212290 (2002)from §Framework of standard cosmol…
“An exotic form of matter
(cosmological constant or something similar) with an equation of
state p≈-ρ (that is, w ≈ -1) having a density parameter of about
Ω_Λ≈ 0.7 (marked by a filled circle in the figure).
The evidence for Ω_Λ will be discussed in section <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The review explicitly generalizes 'cosmological constant' to include time-varying dark energy scenarios ('we shall use the term cosmological constant in a generalized sense including the scenarios in which cosmological "constant" is actually varying in time')
Provides a unified conceptual treatment linking dark energy to scalar field models (quintessence, tachyonic fields) and to the two distinct 'cosmological constant problems' (smallness and coincidence)
Synthesizes cosmological constant/dark energy discussion with de Sitter thermodynamics, string theory landscape, and relaxation mechanisms as a coherent review
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
narrowsrestricts to a special case○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the dynamical scaling scalar field to the special-case cosmological constant (w=-1) characterization of dark energy.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9711102 (1997)from §Abstract
“A weakly coupled scalar field \Phi with a simple exponential potential
V=M_P^4exp(-\lambda\Phi/M_P) where M_P
is the reduced Planck mass, and \lambda > 2, has an
attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe
in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component,
contributing a fixed fraction \Omega_\phi (determined by \lambda) to
the ener…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The model provides an attractor solution for the scalar field's contribution to the energy density that does not require tuning an energy scale characteristic of late times, unlike other scalar-field (dark-energy-like) cosmologies.
Because the solution is a true dynamical attractor, it avoids the fine-tuning problems inherent in cosmological-constant and other decaying-cosmological-constant models.
The required exponential potential and the specific λ value needed for structure formation arise naturally in particle physics theories (e.g., Kaluza-Klein compactifications, supergravity/superstring models), giving a theoretically motivated rather than ad hoc dark-energy-like component.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0586 (2008)from §Table of Cosmological parame…
“w Dark energy equation of state, w= p_DE/ρ_DE”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The five-year data improve constraints on cosmological parameters including dark energy equation of state, with the neutrino mass limit robust to within 10% to a varying dark energy equation of state.
Ω_Λ= 0.742±0.030 is measured with improved precision compared to three-year data.
The paper considers extended models with a constant dark energy equation of state w, bounded by w>-2.5, as part of testing extensions beyond simple ΛCDM.
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
narrowsrestricts to a special case○ inferredthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper treats dark energy mainly as a static cosmological constant, restricting the earlier dynamical scaling-field model to a special limiting case (w=-1).— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9711102 (1997)from §Abstract
“A weakly coupled scalar field \Phi with a simple exponential potential
V=M_P^4exp(-\lambda\Phi/M_P) where M_P
is the reduced Planck mass, and \lambda > 2, has an
attractor solution in a radiation or matter dominated universe
in which it mimics the scaling of the dominant component,
contributing a fixed fraction \Omega_\phi (determined by \lambda) to
the ener…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The model provides an attractor solution for the scalar field's contribution to the energy density that does not require tuning an energy scale characteristic of late times, unlike other scalar-field (dark-energy-like) cosmologies.
Because the solution is a true dynamical attractor, it avoids the fine-tuning problems inherent in cosmological-constant and other decaying-cosmological-constant models.
The required exponential potential and the specific λ value needed for structure formation arise naturally in particle physics theories (e.g., Kaluza-Klein compactifications, supergravity/superstring models), giving a theoretically motivated rather than ad hoc dark-energy-like component.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
The newer paper restricts the dynamical scalar-field dark energy concept to a simple equation-of-state parametrization, treating w=-1 as the special cosmological-constant case rather than a general scalar field.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…the possibility that dark energy was dynamical, e.g., in a form of some light scalar field (Ford 1987; Wetterich 1988; Ratra & Peebles 1988; Peebles & Ratra 1988; Fujii & Nishioka 1990; Chiba et al. 1997; Caldwell et al. 1998; Copeland et al. 1998; Ferreira & Joyce 1998; Zlatev et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/9711068 (1997)from §COSMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES
“The most striking possibility is that a scalar field with an exponential potential could comprise a significant fraction of the energy density of our universe today.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that the scaling solution (where scalar field energy density tracks the barotropic fluid) is the unique late-time attractor whenever λ² > 3γ
Demonstrates that fluid-dominated solutions are always unstable except in the cosmological constant case, meaning the scalar field's energy density never vanishes relative to other matter
Applies nucleosynthesis constraints to derive a 'relic density' problem for such scalar fields with λ² < 20
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
The newer review generalizes quintessence into the broader dark-energy framework driving acceleration, citing the earlier scaling-field analysis for technical fixed-point stability details.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“In order to analyze the stability of the above fixed points it is sufficient to consider only timedependent linear perturbations δxi(t) (i = 1, 2, 3) around them (see [170, 171] for the detail of such analysis).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/9711068 (1997)from §COSMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES
“The most striking possibility is that a scalar field with an exponential potential could comprise a significant fraction of the energy density of our universe today.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that the scaling solution (where scalar field energy density tracks the barotropic fluid) is the unique late-time attractor whenever λ² > 3γ
Demonstrates that fluid-dominated solutions are always unstable except in the cosmological constant case, meaning the scalar field's energy density never vanishes relative to other matter
Applies nucleosynthesis constraints to derive a 'relic density' problem for such scalar fields with λ² < 20
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier scaling scalar-field concept into a broader category of negative-pressure components driving acceleration, encompassing quintessence as one case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/9711068 (1997)from §COSMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES
“The most striking possibility is that a scalar field with an exponential potential could comprise a significant fraction of the energy density of our universe today.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that the scaling solution (where scalar field energy density tracks the barotropic fluid) is the unique late-time attractor whenever λ² > 3γ
Demonstrates that fluid-dominated solutions are always unstable except in the cosmological constant case, meaning the scalar field's energy density never vanishes relative to other matter
Applies nucleosynthesis constraints to derive a 'relic density' problem for such scalar fields with λ² < 20
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2000 The Cosmological ConstantNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper subsumes quintessence scaling models as one specific mechanism under the broader negative-pressure dark energy framework, citing it as a particular tracker case rather than extending its dynamics.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“To date, investigations have focused on scaling or tracker models of quintessence, in which the scalar field energy density can parallel that of matter or radiation, at least for part of its history [86, 62, 279, 158, 232, 278, 219].”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/9711068 (1997)from §COSMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES
“The most striking possibility is that a scalar field with an exponential potential could comprise a significant fraction of the energy density of our universe today.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that the scaling solution (where scalar field energy density tracks the barotropic fluid) is the unique late-time attractor whenever λ² > 3γ
Demonstrates that fluid-dominated solutions are always unstable except in the cosmological constant case, meaning the scalar field's energy density never vanishes relative to other matter
Applies nucleosynthesis constraints to derive a 'relic density' problem for such scalar fields with λ² < 20
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer review generalizes the earlier scalar-field scaling model into the broader dark-energy/cosmological-constant framework explaining accelerated expansion, building on its dynamical concept.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/9711068 (1997)from §COSMOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES
“The most striking possibility is that a scalar field with an exponential potential could comprise a significant fraction of the energy density of our universe today.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that the scaling solution (where scalar field energy density tracks the barotropic fluid) is the unique late-time attractor whenever λ² > 3γ
Demonstrates that fluid-dominated solutions are always unstable except in the cosmological constant case, meaning the scalar field's energy density never vanishes relative to other matter
Applies nucleosynthesis constraints to derive a 'relic density' problem for such scalar fields with λ² < 20
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier quintessence/w framework into a broader observational constraint on w(a) using CMB, BAO, and supernova data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Ignoring the mass of neutrinos and modifications to gravity, one can obtain the growth rate by solving the following differential equation (Wang & Steinhardt 1998; Linder & Jenkins 2003):
d2g
d ln a2 +
[
5 2 + 1 2 (Ωk(a) − 3weff(a)Ωde(a))
]
dg
d ln a
+
[
2Ωk(a) + 3
2 (1 − weff(a))Ωde(a)
]
g(a) = 0,…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9804015 (1998)from §Abstract
“we determine a general expression
for γ that applies to any models with a mixture of cold
dark matter plus cosmological constant or quintessence (a
time-evolving, spatially-inhomogeneous component with negative
pressure) including dependence on the spectral index n,
the Hubble constant h, and the equation-of-state of the quintessence
component w.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Derivation of a general expression for γ (in σ_8 Ω_m^γ) applicable to a wide range of models including sCDM, ΛCDM, and QCDM with quintessence, including dependence on spectral index n, Hubble constant h, and equation-of-state w
New treatment of the mass-temperature relation and virial theorem generalized to quintessence models where the equation-of-state affects background evolution but the component does not cluster
Derivation of a growth index formula f_g = Ω_m(z)^α with an explicit expression for α depending on w, extending growth factor calculations beyond ΛCDM to general quintessence
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2010 SEVEN-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper reduces the general quintessence/dark-energy framework to constraining a specific equation-of-state parameter w (and w0, wa) using observational data, a more restricted application.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Ignoring the mass of neutrinos and modifications to gravity, one can obtain the growth rate by solving a single differential equation (Wang & Steinhardt 1998; Linder & Jenkins 2003).33
The 7-year normalization prior is
∆2R(kWMAP ) = (2.208 ± 0.078) × 10−9 (68% CL), where kWMAP = 0.027 Mpc
−1.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9804015 (1998)from §Abstract
“we determine a general expression
for γ that applies to any models with a mixture of cold
dark matter plus cosmological constant or quintessence (a
time-evolving, spatially-inhomogeneous component with negative
pressure) including dependence on the spectral index n,
the Hubble constant h, and the equation-of-state of the quintessence
component w.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Derivation of a general expression for γ (in σ_8 Ω_m^γ) applicable to a wide range of models including sCDM, ΛCDM, and QCDM with quintessence, including dependence on spectral index n, Hubble constant h, and equation-of-state w
New treatment of the mass-temperature relation and virial theorem generalized to quintessence models where the equation-of-state affects background evolution but the component does not cluster
Derivation of a growth index formula f_g = Ω_m(z)^α with an explicit expression for α depending on w, extending growth factor calculations beyond ΛCDM to general quintessence
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper focuses on the cosmological constant as the specific explanation, restricting the earlier broader quintessence/dark-energy framework to the Λ special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9804015 (1998)from §Abstract
“we determine a general expression
for γ that applies to any models with a mixture of cold
dark matter plus cosmological constant or quintessence (a
time-evolving, spatially-inhomogeneous component with negative
pressure) including dependence on the spectral index n,
the Hubble constant h, and the equation-of-state of the quintessence
component w.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Derivation of a general expression for γ (in σ_8 Ω_m^γ) applicable to a wide range of models including sCDM, ΛCDM, and QCDM with quintessence, including dependence on spectral index n, Hubble constant h, and equation-of-state w
New treatment of the mass-temperature relation and virial theorem generalized to quintessence models where the equation-of-state affects background evolution but the component does not cluster
Derivation of a growth index formula f_g = Ω_m(z)^α with an explicit expression for α depending on w, extending growth factor calculations beyond ΛCDM to general quintessence
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
Newer paper generalizes quintessence's negative-pressure component into a broader dark energy parameterization (Ω_Λ or general w) constrained observationally.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9812313 (1998)from §INTRODUCTION
“Quintessence<cit.> has been proposed as the missing energy component that must
be added to the baryonic and
matter density in order to reach the critical density.<cit.>
Quintessence is
a dynamical, slowly-evolving, spatially
inhomogeneous component with negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Introduces and generalizes 'tracker fields' as a form of quintessence that avoids the coincidence problem via attractor-like convergence from a huge range of initial conditions
Derives a general condition (Γ ≡ V''V/(V')^2 > 1 and nearly constant) for potentials to admit tracker solutions, independent of solving the equation of motion directly
Predicts a distinguishing Ω_Q-w_Q relation for tracker quintessence models versus a cosmological constant
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0907.1660 (2009)from §Introduction
““What is the nature of dark energy?” is one of the current key
questions in physical science.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tight, robust constraints on the dark energy equation of state w=-0.97±0.10 for a constant dark energy equation of state by combining BAO, supernova, and WMAP5 data.
Shows that the BAO distance constraint on Ω_m and H_0 is independent of the behaviour of dark energy at redshifts greater than those probed by the BAO and supernova measurements.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2004 Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier quintessence negative-pressure component into a broader dark energy equation-of-state framework constrained by multiple datasets.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9812313 (1998)from §INTRODUCTION
“Quintessence<cit.> has been proposed as the missing energy component that must
be added to the baryonic and
matter density in order to reach the critical density.<cit.>
Quintessence is
a dynamical, slowly-evolving, spatially
inhomogeneous component with negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Introduces and generalizes 'tracker fields' as a form of quintessence that avoids the coincidence problem via attractor-like convergence from a huge range of initial conditions
Derives a general condition (Γ ≡ V''V/(V')^2 > 1 and nearly constant) for potentials to admit tracker solutions, independent of solving the equation of motion directly
Predicts a distinguishing Ω_Q-w_Q relation for tracker quintessence models versus a cosmological constant
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0407372 (2004)from §Introduction
“A third theoretical prediction of departures from the standard model, and
one whose consequences would be particularly far reaching, is that
dark energy is not simply a cosmological constant introduced
already by Einstein, but something more complicated and dynamical in
nature.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We explore dark energy constraints in models with a fairly general time dependence of dark energy equation of state, finding Ω_λ=0.72± 0.02, w(z=0.3)=-0.98^+0.10_-0.12
One method to constrain the nature of dark energy that has not attracted much attention, yet has the potential to produce results on a relatively short time scale, is comparing measurements of amplitude of fluctuations at high redshift from the Lyα forest and CMB to that at low redshift from galaxy clustering.
We find no evidence for variation of the equation of state with redshift, w(z=1)=-1.03^+0.21_-0.28.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper treats dark energy as a static cosmological constant, a special case of the earlier dynamical scalar-field quintessence with varying equation of state.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9812313 (1998)from §INTRODUCTION
“Quintessence<cit.> has been proposed as the missing energy component that must
be added to the baryonic and
matter density in order to reach the critical density.<cit.>
Quintessence is
a dynamical, slowly-evolving, spatially
inhomogeneous component with negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Introduces and generalizes 'tracker fields' as a form of quintessence that avoids the coincidence problem via attractor-like convergence from a huge range of initial conditions
Derives a general condition (Γ ≡ V''V/(V')^2 > 1 and nearly constant) for potentials to admit tracker solutions, independent of solving the equation of motion directly
Predicts a distinguishing Ω_Q-w_Q relation for tracker quintessence models versus a cosmological constant
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader dark energy framework with equation-of-state parameters constrained observationally, building on the earlier negative-pressure concept.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1409.3242 (2014)from §Abstract
“This "fills the gap" in BAO distance ladder between previously measured local and higher redshift measurements, and affords significant improvement in constraining the properties of dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a 4 per cent distance measurement at z=0.15 that fills a gap in the BAO distance ladder, improving constraints on the equation of state of dark energy
Combining with other BAO measurements provides a 15 per cent improvement in determination of the equation of state of dark energy and H_0
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.78
→2011 THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>CLUSTER SUPERN…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier fixed cosmological-constant notion into a broader equation-of-state framework (w, w0, wa) that includes it as a special case.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…dozen years have passed since combined observations of nearby and distant Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) demonstrated that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating at the current epoch (Perlmutter et al. 1998; Garnavich et al. 1998; Schmidt et al. 1998; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1105.3470 (2011)from §Abstract
“Fourteen of these pass our strict selection cuts
and are used in combination with the world's sample of to
derive the best current constraints on dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Adding these supernovae improves the best combined constraint on dark energy density, ρ_DE(z), at redshifts 1.0 < z < 1.6 by 18% (including systematic errors).
Nearly doubling the statistical weight of HST-discovered SNe Ia beyond z=1.
Corrects for the recently identified correlation between luminosity and host galaxy mass and corrects the NICMOS zeropoint at count rates appropriate for very distant SNe Ia.
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2005 The many lives of active galactic nuclei: cool…Cosmological constant background parameter
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper reduces dark energy from a physically explored negative-pressure component to a simple ΛCDM background parameter used without elaboration.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“It also reproduces the present acceleration of the cosmic expansion inferred from super-
E-mail: darren@astro.berkeley.edu
nova observations (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999), and it is consistent with the mass budget inferred for the present Universe from the dynamics of large-scale…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0508046 (2005)from §Simulation characteristics
“Similarly, Ω_ b and Ω_Λ denote the densities of baryons
and dark energy at the present day.”
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2003 First‐Year<i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Pr…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader dark energy component with a variable equation-of-state parameter w, fitted in cosmological analyses.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302218 (2003)from §§.§.§ Reparameterization
“w is the equation of state of the dark energy component, Ω=Ω_m+Ω_Λ and the radiation density parameter”
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2011 A 3% SOLUTION: DETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CON…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier acceleration discovery by formalizing dark energy via an equation-of-state parameter and combining data to constrain it, generalizing beyond simple cosmological constant.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“While highredshift SNe Ia reveal that the universe is now accelerating (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999), nearby ones provide the most precise measurements of the present expansion rate, H0.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1103.2976 (2011)from §Abstract
“The improved measurement of
H_0, when combined with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)
7-year data, results in an improved constraint on the equation-of-state
parameter of dark energy of w = -1.08 ± 0.10.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides an improved, more precise measurement of H0 (3.3% uncertainty) that, combined with WMAP7 data, yields a tighter constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w than previous determinations.
Uses this improved H0 measurement to rule out the best-fitting gigaparsec-scale void models posited as an alternative to dark energy.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.75
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader equation-of-state framework w(a), building on the original discovery of cosmic acceleration cited from the earlier work.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…of State: SupErNovae trace Cosmic Expansion (ESSENCE) survey (Wood-Vasey et al. 2007), as well as those used in the original papers of the discovery of the acceleration of the universe (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999), and the samples from Barris et al. (2004); Tonry et al. (2003).”
“The issue is the following: when the luminosity distances out to Type Ia supernovae (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999) and the angular diameter distances measured from the BAO (Eisenstein et al. 2005) as well as CMB (Bennett et al. 2003b) are put together in the context of homogeneous and…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2009 IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes negative-pressure acceleration into an equation-of-state framework (w) to test whether dark energy is exactly a cosmological constant, building on the original discovery papers.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“They have been the key element in the discovery that the universe is accelerating and dominated by dark energy (e.g., Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999; Knop et al. 2003; Tonry et al. 2003; Barris et al. 2004; Astier et al. 2006; Riess et al. 2007; Wood-Vasey et al. 2007; Davis et al. 2007;…”
“For the other three fitters, we do not use all the high-redshift SN Ia samples, specifically excluding ∼ 100 objects from the SCP and HighZ objects from Riess et al. (1998), Perlmutter et al. (1999), Knop et al. (2003), Tonry et al. (2003), and Barris et al. (2004).”
“For example, the ESSENCE team modifies the Galactic Line of Sight (glos) prior (Riess et al. 1998; Hatano, Branch, & Deaton 1998; Commins 2004; Riess et al. 2005; Riello & Patat 2005) into the redshift-dependent “glosz” to take into account the redshiftdependent detection probabilities of their…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0901.4804 (2009)from §Introduction
“They have been the key element in the
discovery that the universe is accelerating and dominated by dark energy
<cit.>. Observational efforts
have moved beyond merely establishing the existence of dark energy and are
focused on determining its simplest properties. This is most often done in
terms of the equation of state, p = wρ, where the equation of state
p…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Combines the new CfA3 SN Ia sample with literature samples (forming the 'Constitution' set) to produce improved, more precise constraints on the dark energy equation of state parameter w
Uses four independent light-curve fitters (SALT, SALT2, MLCS2k2 with two R_V values) to test for systematic differences affecting dark energy constraints, for the first time on a sample not used to train them
Identifies and quantifies specific systematic effects (host-galaxy extinction overestimation, Hubble residual trends, population differences by host morphology) that limit current dark energy measurements, reducing statistical uncertainty to the point where systematics dominate
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2003 First‐Year <i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy P…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier vacuum-energy/cosmological-constant idea into a broader parametrized equation-of-state framework constrained by observational data.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.75
→2010 SEVEN-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier cosmological-constant concept into a parameterized equation-of-state framework (w0, wa) to constrain and test dark energy's properties.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…luminosity distances out to high-z Type Ia supernovae have been the most powerful data for first discovering the existence of dark energy (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999) and then constraining the properties of dark energy, such as the equation of state parameter, w (see…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2005 Simulations of the formation, evolution and cl…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier vacuum-energy/cosmological-constant idea into a broader dark energy field framework with a measurable equation of state via BAO constraints.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0504097 (2005)from §Main text (introduction)
“During the past two decades, the cold dark matter (CDM) model,
augmented with a dark energy field (which may take the form of a
cosmological constant `Λ'), has developed into the standard
theoretical paradigm for galaxy formation.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryon-induced features in the initial conditions are reflected in distorted form in the low-redshift galaxy distribution, an effect that can be used to constrain the nature of dark energy with next generation surveys.
Shows for the first time that baryon-induced oscillations detected in the CMB power spectrum survive in distorted form not only in the nonlinear dark matter power spectrum but also in realistically selected galaxy samples at 0<z<3, providing a basis for future surveys to constrain the equation of state of dark energy.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2009 FIRST-YEAR SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY-II SUPERNO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the original discovery of cosmic acceleration by parameterizing dark energy with density and equation-of-state constraints via improved SN, BAO, and CMB data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“5.1. mlcs2k2 Fitting Method
The Multicolor Light Curve Shape method, known as mlcs2k2 in its current incarnation (JRK07), has been in use for more than a decade; the original MLCS version (Riess et al. 1998) was used by the High-z Supernova Team in the discovery of cosmic acceleration.”
“Ten years ago, measurements of the Hubble diagram of Type Ia supernovae (SNe) provided the first direct evidence for cosmic acceleration (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0908.4274 (2009)from §Introduction
“Cosmic acceleration
is most commonly attributed to a new energy-density
component known as dark energy
(for a review, see <cit.>).
The recent SN measurements, in combination with measurements
of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in
galaxy clustering and of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
anisotropy, have provided increasingly
precise constr…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Use of detailed Monte Carlo simulations of all surveys to account for selection biases, including spectroscopic targeting, as a new feature in the analysis
Filling in the redshift 'desert' between low- and high-redshift SN Ia surveys with SDSS-II SN Survey data
Detailed comparison and systematic error analysis of mlcs2k2 vs salt-ii light-curve fitting methods, tracing discrepancies to rest-frame UV modeling and luminosity-color corrections
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.65
→2001 A Measurement by BOOMERANG of Multiple Peaks i…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier supernova-based discovery of negative-pressure dark energy by incorporating it as a constrained parameter alongside CMB and LSS data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…densities inthe Universe", Bartlett J., Dumarchez J. eds.,Editions Frontieres, Paris - astro-ph/0006052S. Perlmutter et al., ApJ, 517, 565(1999)Riess et al., 1998, AJ, 116, 1009Rao, S.M., D. R. Wilton, and A. W. Glis-son,\Electromagnetic scattering by surfaces ofarbitrary shape", IEEE Trans.”
“The LSS (Bond & Ja e 1999) and SN1a supernovae (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999) priors are as described in Langeet al. (2001).”
“Considered hereis the impact of applying a stronger constrainton h, constraints derived from measurements oflarge scale structure (LSS)(Bond & Ja e 1999),results from recent measurements of type Ia super-novae (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999),and the theoretical bias that tot = 1.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0104460 (2001)from §COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
“Parameters explored include those describing energy densities, including
the total energy density Ω_tot, the vacuum energy density
Ω_Λ, and the physical densities of baryons and cold dark
matter, Ω_b h^2 and Ω_c h^2 respectively.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, larger BOOMERANG dataset (four 150 GHz channels, full flight) with improved beam and pointing characterization, enabling detection of multiple acoustic peaks and tighter constraints on Ω_tot, Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, n_s, and by extension Ω_Λ.
Combines CMB data with LSS and SN1a priors to jointly constrain Ω_Λ and other cosmological parameters, showing consistency with a Λ-dominated, low-curvature adiabatic CDM model.
Provides refined determination of Ω_Λ (~0.5–0.7 depending on priors) as part of a 7-dimensional parameter extraction using new analysis pipeline (MASTER-based power spectrum estimation).
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2010 SPECTRA AND<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>LIGHT …Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier discovery of accelerating expansion by parameterizing dark energy's equation of state w, generalizing the simple cosmological constant description.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“About a decade ago, combined observations of nearby and distant SNe Ia led to the discovery of the accelerating universe (Perlmutter et al. 1998; Garnavich et al. 1998; Schmidt et al. 1998; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1004.1711 (2010)from §Abstract
“In particular, at z ≳ 1, the existence and nature
of dark energy are only weakly constrained by the data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents new light curves and spectra of six SNe Ia discovered in 2001, including ground-based J-band photometry for two SNe with z>1
Combines these new SNe with other recent data into an improved compilation called Union2, consisting of 557 supernovae
Refits all light curves with the SALT2 fitter and improves handling of systematic errors compared to the earlier Union compilation
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2005 Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the L…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier discovery of cosmic acceleration by generalizing it to an unknown dark energy component and adding new observational constraints via acoustic-scale measurements.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…can provide precise and robust constraints (Blake & Glazebrook 2003; Hu & Haiman 2003; Linder 2003; Seo & Eisenstein 2003; Amendola et al. 2004; Dolney, Jain, & Takada 2004; Matsubara 2004) on the acceleration of the expansion rate of the universe (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999).”
“The acoustic peak method could provide a geometric complement to the usual luminosity-distance methods such as those based on type Ia supernovae (e.g. Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999; Knop et al. 2003; Tonry et al. 2003; Riess et al. 2004).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2014 Improved cosmological constraints from a joint…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the specific cosmological-constant/vacuum energy mechanism into a broader, model-agnostic dark energy framework parameterized by equation-of-state w.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1401.4064 (2014)from §Introduction
“The reason for the acceleration remains unknown, and the term “dark
energy” is used to describe the
phenomenon.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
When combined with CMB constraints, we measure a constant dark-energy equation of state parameter w=-1.018 ± 0.057(stat+sys) for a flat universe.
Our supernova measurements provide the most stringent constraints to date on the nature of dark energy.
Section uses additional astrophysical probes in combination with SNe Ia to break degeneracies and constrain dark energy in more generic models.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2003 Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Osc…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier cosmological-constant concept by generalizing it to a parametrized dark energy equation of state and proposing new observational constraints.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“It is worth comparing the measurements from future redshift surveys to those inferred from the observations of type Ia supernovae (hereafter SNe) (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999; Riess et al. 2001; Tonry et al. 2003).”
“Recent observations of distant type Ia supernovae have reached the startling conclusion that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating (Perlmutter et al. 1999; Riess et al. 1998, 2001; Tonry et al. 2003).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307460 (2003)from §Introduction
“Under the premise of Friedmann equations,
this implies the existence of an energy component,
christened dark energy, with negative pressure <cit.>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
Uses a full Fisher matrix formalism to treat cosmological constraints from large-scale structure, CMB anisotropies, and supernova data simultaneously, including a time-variable equation of state, extending prior work
Provides an explicit treatment of survey data sets combined with dark energy parameter estimation, differing from previous studies
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier vacuum-energy concept by formalizing it with an equation-of-state parameter and constraining it observationally via WMAP data.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0586 (2008)from §Table of Cosmological parame…
“w Dark energy equation of state, w= p_DE/ρ_DE”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The five-year data improve constraints on cosmological parameters including dark energy equation of state, with the neutrino mass limit robust to within 10% to a varying dark energy equation of state.
Ω_Λ= 0.742±0.030 is measured with improved precision compared to three-year data.
The paper considers extended models with a constant dark energy equation of state w, bounded by w>-2.5, as part of testing extensions beyond simple ΛCDM.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier vacuum-energy/cosmological-constant idea by reviewing dynamical scalar-field models as generalized explanations of cosmic acceleration.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.78
→2007 Observational Constraints on the Nature of Dar…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier negative-pressure/cosmological-constant concept by generalizing it into an equation-of-state parameter w, empirically constrained via supernova data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Making the light curves public, as was done for the results of the HZT and its successors Riess et al. (1998); Tonry et al. (2003); Barris et al. (2004); Krisciunas et al. (2005); Clocchiatti et al. (2006), by Knop et al. (2003), by Riess et al. (2004) for the very high redshift HST supernova program, and for the low-z data of Hamuy et al. (1996), Riess et a…”
“The first SN Ia cosmology results using 7 high-redshift SNe Ia(Perlmutter et al. 1997) found a Universe consistent with ΩM= 1 but subsequent work by the SCP (Perlmutter et al. 1998) and by the HZT (Garnavich et al. 1998) revised this initial finding to favor a lower value of ΩM.”
“Making the light curves public, as was done for the results of the HZT and its successors Riess et al. (1998); Tonry et al. (2003); Barris et al. (2004); Krisciunas et al. (2005); Clocchiatti et al. (2006), by Knop et al. (2003), by Riess et al. (2004) for the very high redshift HST supernova…”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0701041 (2007)from §Abstract
“We present constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter,
w=P/(ρ c^2),
using Type Ia supernovae from the ESSENCE supernova survey.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents first cosmological results from the ESSENCE survey constraining the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w with supernova data over redshift 0.15–0.70
Combines ESSENCE with SNLS to obtain a joint, tighter constraint on w and Ω_M consistent with a cosmological constant
Develops a redshift-dependent host-galaxy extinction prior ('glosz') derived from detailed Monte Carlo simulations of the ESSENCE selection function to reduce systematic bias in dark energy inference
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2012 NINE-YEAR <i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier vacuum-energy/cosmological-constant concept into a parameterized equation-of-state framework (w0, wa) constrained by multiple modern datasets.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Type Ia Supernovae
The first direct evidence for acceleration in the expansion of the universe came from measurements of luminosity distance as a function of redshift using Type Ia supernovae as standard candles (Riess et al. 1998; Schmidt et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 (1998)from §Introduction
“Pre-eminent among these is a possible
energy of the vacuum (Ω_Λ), Einstein's “cosmological constant,” whose negative pressure
would do work to accelerate the expansion (Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992;
Schmidt et al. 1998).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Expands the high-redshift SN Ia sample from 4 to 16 objects combined with 34 nearby SNe to place tighter constraints on Ω_M, Ω_Λ, q_0, and t_0.
Provides detailed methodology (light curve fitting via MLCS and Δm15(B) template methods, K-corrections, photometric calibration) allowing independent verification of results.
Reports that spectroscopically confirmed SNe Ia are statistically consistent with q_0<0 and Ω_Λ>0 at high confidence (up to 9σ for flat-universe prior), providing strong evidence for a currently accelerating universe.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1212.5226 (2012)from §Introduction
“Despite its notable success at describing all current cosmological data sets, the standard model raises many questions: what is the nature of dark matter and dark energy?”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Nine-year WMAP data combined with high-l CMB, BAO, and H0 determine Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, and Ω_Λ each to ~1.5% precision
Restricting supernova data use to models examining the dark energy equation of state due to residual systematic errors in SN samples
Updated methodology for combining WMAP with SPT/ACT/BAO/H0/SNe to constrain dark energy equation of state parameters (w, w0, wa) more tightly than previous WMAP releases
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
Citation context concerns cosmological birefringence, not dark energy equation of state, suggesting weak topical link but formal parameterization extends earlier negative-pressure concept.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Polarization of photons offers a powerful way of probing the cosmological parity violation, or the “cosmological birefringence” (Lue et al. 1999; Carroll 1998).”
“In this case, the rotation angle is given by ∆α = ∫
dt a φ̇/M = (∆φ)/M (Carroll et al.
1990; Carroll 1998; Liu et al. 2006; Xia et al. 2008).”
“Such an unusual rotation of polarization vectors has been constrained by observations of radio galaxies and quasars (Carroll 1998): one of the best data sets available today at a single redshift is 3C9 at z = 2.012, which gives a limit on the rotation angle, ∆α = 2◦ ± 3◦ (68% CL).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9806099 (1998)from §Introduction
“Recently a number of pieces of evidence, especially
studies of the Hubble diagram for Type Ia supernovae <cit.>,
have lent support to the idea that the universe is dominated
by a smooth component with an effective negative pressure,
leading to an accelerating expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Explores whether an approximate global symmetry can suppress couplings of the quintessence field to ordinary matter, allowing it to evade existing constraints on long-range forces and time variation of constants.
Identifies a derivative coupling of quintessence to the electromagnetic pseudoscalar F_{\mu\nu}\tilde F^{\mu\nu} as an allowed, symmetry-respecting interaction that could rotate polarization of light from distant sources, offering a potential observational signature of quintessence.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2010 SEVEN-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general negative-pressure/quintessence concept to a specific parametrized equation-of-state (w0, wa) framework constrained by observational data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“While the standard model predicts CTBl = 0 and hence 〈Ur〉 = 0, models in which the global parity symmetry is violated can create CTBl = sin(2∆α)C TE l (Lue et al. 1999; Carroll 1998; Feng et al. 2005).”
“Parity Violation
While the TB and EB correlations vanish in a parity-conserving universe, they may not vanish when global parity symmetry is broken on cosmological scales (Lue et al. 1999; Carroll 1998).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9806099 (1998)from §Introduction
“Recently a number of pieces of evidence, especially
studies of the Hubble diagram for Type Ia supernovae <cit.>,
have lent support to the idea that the universe is dominated
by a smooth component with an effective negative pressure,
leading to an accelerating expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Explores whether an approximate global symmetry can suppress couplings of the quintessence field to ordinary matter, allowing it to evade existing constraints on long-range forces and time variation of constants.
Identifies a derivative coupling of quintessence to the electromagnetic pseudoscalar F_{\mu\nu}\tilde F^{\mu\nu} as an allowed, symmetry-respecting interaction that could rotate polarization of light from distant sources, offering a potential observational signature of quintessence.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper focuses specifically on the cosmological constant explanation, restricting the broader negative-pressure/quintessence framework of the earlier paper to a special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9806099 (1998)from §Introduction
“Recently a number of pieces of evidence, especially
studies of the Hubble diagram for Type Ia supernovae <cit.>,
have lent support to the idea that the universe is dominated
by a smooth component with an effective negative pressure,
leading to an accelerating expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Explores whether an approximate global symmetry can suppress couplings of the quintessence field to ordinary matter, allowing it to evade existing constraints on long-range forces and time variation of constants.
Identifies a derivative coupling of quintessence to the electromagnetic pseudoscalar F_{\mu\nu}\tilde F^{\mu\nu} as an allowed, symmetry-respecting interaction that could rotate polarization of light from distant sources, offering a potential observational signature of quintessence.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper takes the general negative-pressure/quintessence framework and constrains it observationally to a specific w(a) parametrization near w=-1, a special-case refinement.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…the possibility that dark energy was dynamical, e.g., in a form of some light scalar field (Ford 1987; Wetterich 1988; Ratra & Peebles 1988; Peebles & Ratra 1988; Fujii & Nishioka 1990; Chiba et al. 1997; Caldwell et al. 1998; Copeland et al. 1998; Ferreira & Joyce 1998; Zlatev et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9807002 (1998)from §Introduction
“Measurements of
the cosmic microwave background,
the mass power spectrum<cit.>, and,
most explicitly, the luminosity-red shift relation observed for
Type Ia supernovae<cit.>, all suggest that the missing energy should
possess negative pressure (p) and equation-of-state
(w ≡ p/ρ).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Introduces the notion of a "tracker field," a form of quintessence, to explain the cosmic coincidence problem
Shows that tracker solutions are attractor-like but not fixed points, unlike previously studied self-adjusting quintessence solutions
Demonstrates that tracker models are extremely insensitive to initial conditions (variations by ~100 orders of magnitude) while matching CMB, large-scale structure, and supernova acceleration data
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2009 Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digi…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper focuses specifically on constraining Ω_Λ/w via observational data, narrowing the earlier broader conceptual definition to a measurable cosmological parameter.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9807002 (1998)from §Introduction
“Measurements of
the cosmic microwave background,
the mass power spectrum<cit.>, and,
most explicitly, the luminosity-red shift relation observed for
Type Ia supernovae<cit.>, all suggest that the missing energy should
possess negative pressure (p) and equation-of-state
(w ≡ p/ρ).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Introduces the notion of a "tracker field," a form of quintessence, to explain the cosmic coincidence problem
Shows that tracker solutions are attractor-like but not fixed points, unlike previously studied self-adjusting quintessence solutions
Demonstrates that tracker models are extremely insensitive to initial conditions (variations by ~100 orders of magnitude) while matching CMB, large-scale structure, and supernova acceleration data
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0907.1660 (2009)from §Introduction
““What is the nature of dark energy?” is one of the current key
questions in physical science.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tight, robust constraints on the dark energy equation of state w=-0.97±0.10 for a constant dark energy equation of state by combining BAO, supernova, and WMAP5 data.
Shows that the BAO distance constraint on Ω_m and H_0 is independent of the behaviour of dark energy at redshifts greater than those probed by the BAO and supernova measurements.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2003 Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Osc…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the same negative-pressure w-parameterization but applies it specifically to observational constraint via BAO measurements, a special empirical domain.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…Carroll, Press, & Turner 1992) has a constant equation of state of −1, while general quintessence models (Caldwell et al. 1998) and other theories (Zlatev et al. 1999; Bucher & Spergel 1999; Armendariz-Picon et al. 2000; Boyle et al. 2001; Gu & Hwang 2001; Kasuya 2001; Bilic et al. 2002;…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9807002 (1998)from §Introduction
“Measurements of
the cosmic microwave background,
the mass power spectrum<cit.>, and,
most explicitly, the luminosity-red shift relation observed for
Type Ia supernovae<cit.>, all suggest that the missing energy should
possess negative pressure (p) and equation-of-state
(w ≡ p/ρ).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Introduces the notion of a "tracker field," a form of quintessence, to explain the cosmic coincidence problem
Shows that tracker solutions are attractor-like but not fixed points, unlike previously studied self-adjusting quintessence solutions
Demonstrates that tracker models are extremely insensitive to initial conditions (variations by ~100 orders of magnitude) while matching CMB, large-scale structure, and supernova acceleration data
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307460 (2003)from §Introduction
“Under the premise of Friedmann equations,
this implies the existence of an energy component,
christened dark energy, with negative pressure <cit.>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
Uses a full Fisher matrix formalism to treat cosmological constraints from large-scale structure, CMB anisotropies, and supernova data simultaneously, including a time-variable equation of state, extending prior work
Provides an explicit treatment of survey data sets combined with dark energy parameter estimation, differing from previous studies
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the broader dark energy concept (vacuum energy or quintessence) to focus specifically on the cosmological constant as the driver of acceleration.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9807002 (1998)from §Introduction
“Measurements of
the cosmic microwave background,
the mass power spectrum<cit.>, and,
most explicitly, the luminosity-red shift relation observed for
Type Ia supernovae<cit.>, all suggest that the missing energy should
possess negative pressure (p) and equation-of-state
(w ≡ p/ρ).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Introduces the notion of a "tracker field," a form of quintessence, to explain the cosmic coincidence problem
Shows that tracker solutions are attractor-like but not fixed points, unlike previously studied self-adjusting quintessence solutions
Demonstrates that tracker models are extremely insensitive to initial conditions (variations by ~100 orders of magnitude) while matching CMB, large-scale structure, and supernova acceleration data
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier X-component/α_x framework into the standard w(z), w0-wa parametrization using improved high-z supernova data to constrain time evolution.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…dozen years have passed since combined observations of nearby and distant Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) demonstrated that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating at the current epoch (Perlmutter et al. 1998; Garnavich et al. 1998; Schmidt et al. 1998; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9806396 (1998)from §ANALYSIS
“Because the origin of the acceleration is unknown, we will refer to this
as the “X” component with a density of Ω_ x and equation of
state of P_ x =α_ xρ_ x. Caldwell, Dave, & Steinhardt (1998) have
dubbed the unknown component “quintessence” as the other four essences
have already been employed above.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Places new observational constraints on the equation of state parameter of the unknown dark energy component using an expanded Type Ia supernova sample
Rules out topological defects (strings, textures) and disfavors domain walls as the dominant dark energy component at high confidence
Combines supernova data with CMB first acoustic peak measurements to jointly constrain matter density and the unknown energy component, providing evidence for a flat universe
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1105.3470 (2011)from §Abstract
“Fourteen of these pass our strict selection cuts
and are used in combination with the world's sample of to
derive the best current constraints on dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Adding these supernovae improves the best combined constraint on dark energy density, ρ_DE(z), at redshifts 1.0 < z < 1.6 by 18% (including systematic errors).
Nearly doubling the statistical weight of HST-discovered SNe Ia beyond z=1.
Corrects for the recently identified correlation between luminosity and host galaxy mass and corrects the NICMOS zeropoint at count rates appropriate for very distant SNe Ia.
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2009 IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier X-component/α_x framework, renaming parameters (w vs α_x) and improving constraints with better SN Ia data on the same acceleration concept.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The first study on the equation of state produced a 95%-confidence limit of 1+w < 0.3,
assuming ΩM ∼ 0.2 and zero possibility of 1 + w < 0 (Garnavich et al. 1998).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9806396 (1998)from §ANALYSIS
“Because the origin of the acceleration is unknown, we will refer to this
as the “X” component with a density of Ω_ x and equation of
state of P_ x =α_ xρ_ x. Caldwell, Dave, & Steinhardt (1998) have
dubbed the unknown component “quintessence” as the other four essences
have already been employed above.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Places new observational constraints on the equation of state parameter of the unknown dark energy component using an expanded Type Ia supernova sample
Rules out topological defects (strings, textures) and disfavors domain walls as the dominant dark energy component at high confidence
Combines supernova data with CMB first acoustic peak measurements to jointly constrain matter density and the unknown energy component, providing evidence for a flat universe
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0901.4804 (2009)from §Introduction
“They have been the key element in the
discovery that the universe is accelerating and dominated by dark energy
<cit.>. Observational efforts
have moved beyond merely establishing the existence of dark energy and are
focused on determining its simplest properties. This is most often done in
terms of the equation of state, p = wρ, where the equation of state
p…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Combines the new CfA3 SN Ia sample with literature samples (forming the 'Constitution' set) to produce improved, more precise constraints on the dark energy equation of state parameter w
Uses four independent light-curve fitters (SALT, SALT2, MLCS2k2 with two R_V values) to test for systematic differences affecting dark energy constraints, for the first time on a sample not used to train them
Identifies and quantifies specific systematic effects (host-galaxy extinction overestimation, Hubble residual trends, population differences by host morphology) that limit current dark energy measurements, reducing statistical uncertainty to the point where systematics dominate
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2003 First‐Year <i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy P…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier X-component/equation-of-state idea, refining constraints with better data while keeping the same conceptual framework.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9806396 (1998)from §ANALYSIS
“Because the origin of the acceleration is unknown, we will refer to this
as the “X” component with a density of Ω_ x and equation of
state of P_ x =α_ xρ_ x. Caldwell, Dave, & Steinhardt (1998) have
dubbed the unknown component “quintessence” as the other four essences
have already been employed above.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Places new observational constraints on the equation of state parameter of the unknown dark energy component using an expanded Type Ia supernova sample
Rules out topological defects (strings, textures) and disfavors domain walls as the dominant dark energy component at high confidence
Combines supernova data with CMB first acoustic peak measurements to jointly constrain matter density and the unknown energy component, providing evidence for a flat universe
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2010 SPECTRA AND<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>LIGHT …Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper treats dark energy specifically via a single equation-of-state parameter w and cosmological constant framing, refining the earlier broader X-component with generic α_x constraint.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“About a decade ago, combined observations of nearby and distant SNe Ia led to the discovery of the accelerating universe (Perlmutter et al. 1998; Garnavich et al. 1998; Schmidt et al. 1998; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9806396 (1998)from §ANALYSIS
“Because the origin of the acceleration is unknown, we will refer to this
as the “X” component with a density of Ω_ x and equation of
state of P_ x =α_ xρ_ x. Caldwell, Dave, & Steinhardt (1998) have
dubbed the unknown component “quintessence” as the other four essences
have already been employed above.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Places new observational constraints on the equation of state parameter of the unknown dark energy component using an expanded Type Ia supernova sample
Rules out topological defects (strings, textures) and disfavors domain walls as the dominant dark energy component at high confidence
Combines supernova data with CMB first acoustic peak measurements to jointly constrain matter density and the unknown energy component, providing evidence for a flat universe
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1004.1711 (2010)from §Abstract
“In particular, at z ≳ 1, the existence and nature
of dark energy are only weakly constrained by the data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents new light curves and spectra of six SNe Ia discovered in 2001, including ground-based J-band photometry for two SNe with z>1
Combines these new SNe with other recent data into an improved compilation called Union2, consisting of 557 supernovae
Refits all light curves with the SALT2 fitter and improves handling of systematic errors compared to the earlier Union compilation
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general negative-pressure 'X' component to the specific case of the cosmological constant, a special instance of the earlier broader parametrization.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9806396 (1998)from §ANALYSIS
“Because the origin of the acceleration is unknown, we will refer to this
as the “X” component with a density of Ω_ x and equation of
state of P_ x =α_ xρ_ x. Caldwell, Dave, & Steinhardt (1998) have
dubbed the unknown component “quintessence” as the other four essences
have already been employed above.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Places new observational constraints on the equation of state parameter of the unknown dark energy component using an expanded Type Ia supernova sample
Rules out topological defects (strings, textures) and disfavors domain walls as the dominant dark energy component at high confidence
Combines supernova data with CMB first acoustic peak measurements to jointly constrain matter density and the unknown energy component, providing evidence for a flat universe
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
The newer paper generalizes the earlier equation-of-state framing into a broader physical picture connecting vacuum energy, particle physics, and observational evidence for cosmic acceleration.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“There are a number of potential sources of systematic error which have been considered by the two teams; see the original papers [223, 212, 195] for a thorough discussion.”
“In their original papers [223, 212, 195], the supernova teams found impressive consistency in the spectral and photometric properties of Type Ia supernovae over a variety of redshifts and environments (e.”
“z for the High-Z Supernova Team [102, 223, 212, 101], and Figure 4 shows the equivalent results for the Supernova Cosmology Project [196, 194, 195].”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9805200 (1998)from §Introduction
“The CMB observations provide a nearly orthogonal set of parameters, so we will be
able to separate the effects of any exotic forms of matter-energy in the Universe from
normal matter.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
First results from the High-Z SN Search program extending SN Ia luminosity distance measurements to z ≥ 0.2
Development of custom high-throughput redshifted B and V interference filters to minimize K-correction uncertainties for distant SN Ia
First photometric and spectroscopic analysis of SN 1995K yielding a precise luminosity distance at z=0.479
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the fixed cosmological-constant parameter into a broader dark energy equation-of-state framework, of which Λ is a special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9901122 (1999)from §THE SIMULATIONS
“an open model
(OCDM: Ω_0 = 0.3, Ω_Λ = 0, h=0.7)
and a flat model with non-zero cosmological constant
(ΛCDM: Ω_0 = 0.3, Ω_Λ = 0.7, h=0.7).”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
The newer paper generalizes dark energy from a fixed cosmological constant parameter to a broader negative-pressure component encompassing quintessence and f(R) alternatives.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The Sheth–Tormen mass function [535] and the Navarro–Frenk–White halo profile [449] are usually employed in GR.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9901122 (1999)from §THE SIMULATIONS
“an open model
(OCDM: Ω_0 = 0.3, Ω_Λ = 0, h=0.7)
and a flat model with non-zero cosmological constant
(ΛCDM: Ω_0 = 0.3, Ω_Λ = 0.7, h=0.7).”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2011 Modified gravity and cosmologyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes dark energy from a fixed cosmological-constant parameter into a broader observationally-inferred negative-pressure component motivating modified gravity, building on the earlier narrower usage.rn— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“To obtain the comoving number density of halos per logarithmic interval in the virial mass, and the linear bias, they use the Sheth-Tormen method [1137], while they use the Navarro-Frenk-White [946] form for halo profiles.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9901122 (1999)from §THE SIMULATIONS
“an open model
(OCDM: Ω_0 = 0.3, Ω_Λ = 0, h=0.7)
and a flat model with non-zero cosmological constant
(ΛCDM: Ω_0 = 0.3, Ω_Λ = 0.7, h=0.7).”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1106.2476 (2011)from §Introduction
“More recently, `dark energy' has also been found to be required in
order to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the
Universe.”
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2004 Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the fixed cosmological constant into a broader dark energy component with a variable equation of state, extending the earlier fixed-Λ treatment.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9901122 (1999)from §THE SIMULATIONS
“an open model
(OCDM: Ω_0 = 0.3, Ω_Λ = 0, h=0.7)
and a flat model with non-zero cosmological constant
(ΛCDM: Ω_0 = 0.3, Ω_Λ = 0.7, h=0.7).”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0407372 (2004)from §Introduction
“A third theoretical prediction of departures from the standard model, and
one whose consequences would be particularly far reaching, is that
dark energy is not simply a cosmological constant introduced
already by Einstein, but something more complicated and dynamical in
nature.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We explore dark energy constraints in models with a fairly general time dependence of dark energy equation of state, finding Ω_λ=0.72± 0.02, w(z=0.3)=-0.98^+0.10_-0.12
One method to constrain the nature of dark energy that has not attracted much attention, yet has the potential to produce results on a relatively short time scale, is comparing measurements of amplitude of fluctuations at high redshift from the Lyα forest and CMB to that at low redshift from galaxy clustering.
We find no evidence for variation of the equation of state with redshift, w(z=1)=-1.03^+0.21_-0.28.
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological-constant explanation into a broader phenomenological dark-energy framework encompassing quintessence and geometrical/modified-gravity origins.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0706.2041 (2007)from §Introduction
“Continuing investigation of dark energy (DE) properties in the Universe
(see the recent review <cit.> for the definitions of what is usually
called the effective DE energy density ρ_DE and pressure p_DE
from the observational point of view) has shown that its properties are
very close to those of an exact cosmological constant Λ that has
ρ_Λ= - p_Λ= Λ/8π G=c…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes a new class of f(R) gravity models that produce viable cosmology different from ΛCDM at recent times while satisfying cosmological, Solar system, and laboratory tests
Introduces the 'disappearing cosmological constant' concept: f(0)=0 so the cosmological constant vanishes in flat spacetime but appears effectively in curved spacetime for large R
Identifies a new problem for f(R)-based dark energy models: possible overproduction of massive scalar particles (scalarons) in the early Universe
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.80
→2000 ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTE…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The X-component generalizes the cosmological constant to a broader class of negative-pressure fluids, extending rather than merely renaming or restricting the earlier concept.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 (2000)from §Introduction
“We will be interested in this work in some dominant X-component, which can be described as
a perfect fluid with an equation of state specified by -1<w_X≡ p_X/ρ_X<-1/3,
thus enabling that component to induce accelerated expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We find all the critical points of the system for constant equations of state in that range.
We consider further several background quantities that can distinguish the models with different w_X values.
Using a simple toy model with a varying equation of state, we show that even a large variation of w_X at small redshifts is very difficult to observe with d_L(z) measurements up to z∼1.
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader dark energy framework with time-varying equation of state w(a), of which Λ is a special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2003 Can the dark energy equation-of-state paramete…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader phenomenological framework using the equation-of-state parameter w, including Λ as a special case plus dynamical alternatives.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0301273 (2003)from §Introduction
“Cosmological observations strongly indicate that the universe is
dominated by a smoothly distributed, slowly varying dark energy component”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Investigates whether phantom dark energy models with w<-1, naively unstable due to negative kinetic terms, could be phenomenologically viable when treated as effective field theories valid only up to a momentum cutoff
Calculates the tree-level decay rate of a phantom particle into other phantoms and gravitons, showing it is naively infinite but can be rendered finite with a cutoff
Shows that under optimistic assumptions (approximate shift symmetry), the instability timescale can exceed the age of the universe only if the cutoff is at or below 100 MeV, providing a quantitative bound on viable phantom dark energy models
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
The newer paper broadens the cosmological constant framework into a general negative-pressure dark energy concept, adding f(R) gravity and equation-of-state characterization as extensions.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2002 The cosmological constant and dark energyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader negative-pressure, potentially dynamical component, extending the earlier static Λ concept.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0207347 (2002)from §§ INTRODUCTION
“There is significant observational evidence for the detection of
Einstein's cosmological constant, Λ, or a component of
the material content of the universe that varies only slowly with
time and space and so acts like Λ. We will use the term
dark energy for Λ or a component that acts like it.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper reviews and synthesizes the physics, astronomy, and history of ideas about the cosmological constant/dark energy, assessing the observational evidence and recent developments in searching for a fundamental theory since Weinberg's 1989 review.
It discusses the possibility that dark energy is dynamical, evolving toward zero, as an approach to alleviate the fine-tuning problem of the cosmological constant.
It provides an explicit example (zero-point energy of the 3K background radiation) quantifying the magnitude of the cosmological constant problem.
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2007 Extended theories of gravity and their cosmolo…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
Generalizes cosmological constant to a broader negative-pressure fluid framework, while proposing an alternative curvature-based explanation replacing exotic dark energy.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0706.1146 (2007)from §Introduction
“If combined with constraints coming
from galaxy clusters on the matter density parameter Ω_M,
these data indicate that the Universe is dominated by a
non-clustered fluid with negative pressure, generically dubbed
dark energy, which is able to drive the accelerated
expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes that dark energy and dark matter could be reinterpreted as 'shortcomings' of General Relativity rather than as real exotic components, and that extending gravity (via f(R) and scalar-tensor Extended Theories of Gravity) can reproduce accelerated expansion and other 'dark' phenomena as curvature effects.
Claims that dark energy and quintessence issues can be addressed as curvature effects within Extended Theories of Gravity, offering cosmological models fitted to observational data without adding unknown exotic ingredients to the cosmic pie.
Argues for changing the gravitational side of Einstein's equations (via non-linear Lagrangians) rather than the matter side, as a simpler alternative to invoking dark energy/dark matter.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant framework into a broader negative-pressure category encompassing quintessence and other dynamical models.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2000 The Cosmological ConstantNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the cosmological-constant framework into the general negative-pressure vacuum-energy concept, adding particle-physics context and observational evidence beyond the earlier review.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Here is an incomplete list of additional possibilities; see also [48, 58, 218].”
“Some earlier discussions include [85, 50, 221], and subsequent reviews include [58, 218, 246].”
“The classic discussion of the physics of the cosmological constant is by Weinberg [264], with more recent work discussed by [58, 218].”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2003 Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational ph…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes cosmological constant to a broader negative-pressure fluid parametrized by equation-of-state w_DE, extending the earlier Λ-based explanation.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0306438 (2003)from §Introduction
“Cosmic speed-up can be accommodated within general relativity by
invoking a mysterious cosmic fluid with large negative pressure,
dubbed dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that tiny R^n (n<0) corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action can produce cosmic acceleration, eliminating the need for dark energy as a separate fluid component
Provides a unified purely gravitational origin for both early-time inflation (R^n, n>0) and late-time acceleration (R^n, n<0), avoiding invocation of dark energy or an inflaton field
Identifies self-accelerating vacuum solutions (de Sitter and anti-de Sitter) as alternatives to a cosmological constant, with effective equation-of-state parameters mimicking dark energy (w_DE=-1 or w_DE<-2/3) without actual dark energy
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2001 An alternative to quintessenceNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader negative-pressure dark energy framework and proposes Chaplygin gas as an extended unifying model.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/0103004 (2001)from §Introduction
“The discovery that the expansion of the universe is accelerating <cit.> has promoted the search for new types of matter that can behave like a cosmological constant <cit.> by combining positive energy density and negative pressure. This type of matter is often called ”quintessence”.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes the Chaplygin gas equation of state p = -A/ρ as an alternative to scalar-field quintessence models for explaining cosmic acceleration.
Shows that a single exotic fluid (Chaplygin gas) can interpolate between dust-dominated and de Sitter (cosmological-constant-dominated) phases without invoking separate dark matter and dark energy components.
Predicts that the effective cosmological constant increases with time in this model, offering a distinctive observational signature.
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general negative-pressure/quintessence framework to an observationally constrained equation-of-state parameter near -1, favoring the cosmological constant special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9906463 (1999)from §Introduction
“Now, the mounting evidence described below
is forcing us to consider the possibility
that some cosmic dark energy exists that opposes the
self-attraction of
matter and is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Introduces the 'cosmic triangle' as a unified geometric representation (Ω_m, Ω_Λ, Ω_k) synthesizing multiple independent observational constraints (cluster mass, baryon fraction, supernovae acceleration, CMB curvature) to pinpoint the universe's current state and trace its past and future trajectory.
Synthesizes diverse recent observations (cluster mass-to-light, baryon fraction, cluster abundance evolution, supernova Hubble diagrams, gravitational lensing statistics, CMB anisotropy) into a coherent case for a low-density, accelerating, flat universe requiring dark energy.
Clarifies the distinction between geometric curvature-based definitions of open/closed/flat and the dynamical fate of the universe (expand forever vs. recollapse), noting these need not coincide when dark energy is present.
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.65
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the broader dark energy concept (including quintessence and general negative-pressure components) to focus specifically on the cosmological constant as the primary explanation.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9906463 (1999)from §Introduction
“Now, the mounting evidence described below
is forcing us to consider the possibility
that some cosmic dark energy exists that opposes the
self-attraction of
matter and is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Introduces the 'cosmic triangle' as a unified geometric representation (Ω_m, Ω_Λ, Ω_k) synthesizing multiple independent observational constraints (cluster mass, baryon fraction, supernovae acceleration, CMB curvature) to pinpoint the universe's current state and trace its past and future trajectory.
Synthesizes diverse recent observations (cluster mass-to-light, baryon fraction, cluster abundance evolution, supernova Hubble diagrams, gravitational lensing statistics, CMB anisotropy) into a coherent case for a low-density, accelerating, flat universe requiring dark energy.
Clarifies the distinction between geometric curvature-based definitions of open/closed/flat and the dynamical fate of the universe (expand forever vs. recollapse), noting these need not coincide when dark energy is present.
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader dark energy framework with variable equation-of-state parameter, encompassing the earlier fixed-Λ treatment as a special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004404 (2000)from §A peak at ℓ≈ 200 implies a f…
“the cosmological constant, Ω_Λ (0-1);”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides an independent CMB-based constraint on Ω_m and Ω_Λ from the location of the first acoustic peak, complementing prior supernova-based measurements of Λ
Places the tightest constraint yet on Ω_0=Ω_m+Ω_Λ (0.88<Ω_0<1.12) using resolved CMB structure, supporting a flat, Euclidean universe consistent with a nonzero cosmological constant as suggested by supernova surveys
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302506 (2003)from §Introduction
“The dark energy is usually described by an “equation-of-state” parameter w≡ p/ρ, the ratio of the spatially-homogeneous dark-energy pressure p to its energy density ρ.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Explores the consequences if dark energy is phantom energy with w<-1, leading to a 'Big Rip' cosmic doomsday scenario not previously considered in detail
Generalizes cosmological constraints on dark energy parameter space to include w<-1 phantom energy models
Derives the time-scale for dissociation of gravitationally bound systems (galaxy clusters, Milky Way, solar system, Earth, atoms, nuclei) due to phantom energy before the Big Rip
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.75
→2001 Constraining Cosmological Parameters Based on …Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant into a broader negative-pressure component with variable equation of state w_Q(z), building on the earlier Ω_Λ framework.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Available data for the microwave background anisotropies on degree scales (de Bernardis et al. 2000; Hanany et al. 2000; Netterfield et al. 2002; Lee et al. 2001) and the Hubble diagram of Type Ia supernovae (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999) indicate that the universe has a flat geometry…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004404 (2000)from §A peak at ℓ≈ 200 implies a f…
“the cosmological constant, Ω_Λ (0-1);”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides an independent CMB-based constraint on Ω_m and Ω_Λ from the location of the first acoustic peak, complementing prior supernova-based measurements of Λ
Places the tightest constraint yet on Ω_0=Ω_m+Ω_Λ (0.88<Ω_0<1.12) using resolved CMB structure, supporting a flat, Euclidean universe consistent with a nonzero cosmological constant as suggested by supernova surveys
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0106145 (2001)from §Introduction
“indicate that the Universe has a flat geometry and is
dominated at present by some form of dark energy with a negative pressure
(Garnavich et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999). The equation of state of
the dark energy, p_Q=w_Q ρ_Q, expresses the ratio between the
pressure, p_Q, and the mass density, ρ_Q, of the dark energy in
terms of the parameter w_Q (in u…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes a new differential galaxy age method (using dz/dt from spectroscopic dating of passively-evolving galaxies) that measures the equation-of-state history w_Q(z) directly, offering much better sensitivity than the standard luminosity distance method used by supernova surveys like SNAP.
Shows that the second derivative d^2z/dt^2 depends explicitly on w_Q without additional integrations, making it a more direct probe of dark energy's equation of state than luminosity distance measurements.
Demonstrates via simulated spectra and statistical analysis that ~70 pairs of passively-evolving galaxies observed at S/N~30 can distinguish between constant and variable w_Q(z) histories, a novel observational strategy for constraining dark energy from the ground.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.75
→2000 ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTE…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the fixed cosmological constant into a broader X-component fluid with variable equation of state w_X, extending the earlier concept.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004404 (2000)from §A peak at ℓ≈ 200 implies a f…
“the cosmological constant, Ω_Λ (0-1);”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides an independent CMB-based constraint on Ω_m and Ω_Λ from the location of the first acoustic peak, complementing prior supernova-based measurements of Λ
Places the tightest constraint yet on Ω_0=Ω_m+Ω_Λ (0.88<Ω_0<1.12) using resolved CMB structure, supporting a flat, Euclidean universe consistent with a nonzero cosmological constant as suggested by supernova surveys
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 (2000)from §Introduction
“We will be interested in this work in some dominant X-component, which can be described as
a perfect fluid with an equation of state specified by -1<w_X≡ p_X/ρ_X<-1/3,
thus enabling that component to induce accelerated expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We find all the critical points of the system for constant equations of state in that range.
We consider further several background quantities that can distinguish the models with different w_X values.
Using a simple toy model with a varying equation of state, we show that even a large variation of w_X at small redshifts is very difficult to observe with d_L(z) measurements up to z∼1.
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2007 Extended theories of gravity and their cosmolo…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
Newer paper generalizes cosmological constant into broader negative-pressure dark energy fluid concept, then extends discussion to alternative gravitational explanations.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004404 (2000)from §A peak at ℓ≈ 200 implies a f…
“the cosmological constant, Ω_Λ (0-1);”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides an independent CMB-based constraint on Ω_m and Ω_Λ from the location of the first acoustic peak, complementing prior supernova-based measurements of Λ
Places the tightest constraint yet on Ω_0=Ω_m+Ω_Λ (0.88<Ω_0<1.12) using resolved CMB structure, supporting a flat, Euclidean universe consistent with a nonzero cosmological constant as suggested by supernova surveys
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0706.1146 (2007)from §Introduction
“If combined with constraints coming
from galaxy clusters on the matter density parameter Ω_M,
these data indicate that the Universe is dominated by a
non-clustered fluid with negative pressure, generically dubbed
dark energy, which is able to drive the accelerated
expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes that dark energy and dark matter could be reinterpreted as 'shortcomings' of General Relativity rather than as real exotic components, and that extending gravity (via f(R) and scalar-tensor Extended Theories of Gravity) can reproduce accelerated expansion and other 'dark' phenomena as curvature effects.
Claims that dark energy and quintessence issues can be addressed as curvature effects within Extended Theories of Gravity, offering cosmological models fitted to observational data without adding unknown exotic ingredients to the cosmic pie.
Argues for changing the gravitational side of Einstein's equations (via non-linear Lagrangians) rather than the matter side, as a simpler alternative to invoking dark energy/dark matter.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2002 Cosmological constant—the weight of the vacuumNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier cosmological constant parameter into a broader dynamical dark energy framework with variable equation of state, extending its scope.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004404 (2000)from §A peak at ℓ≈ 200 implies a f…
“the cosmological constant, Ω_Λ (0-1);”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides an independent CMB-based constraint on Ω_m and Ω_Λ from the location of the first acoustic peak, complementing prior supernova-based measurements of Λ
Places the tightest constraint yet on Ω_0=Ω_m+Ω_Λ (0.88<Ω_0<1.12) using resolved CMB structure, supporting a flat, Euclidean universe consistent with a nonzero cosmological constant as suggested by supernova surveys
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0212290 (2002)from §Framework of standard cosmol…
“An exotic form of matter
(cosmological constant or something similar) with an equation of
state p≈-ρ (that is, w ≈ -1) having a density parameter of about
Ω_Λ≈ 0.7 (marked by a filled circle in the figure).
The evidence for Ω_Λ will be discussed in section <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The review explicitly generalizes 'cosmological constant' to include time-varying dark energy scenarios ('we shall use the term cosmological constant in a generalized sense including the scenarios in which cosmological "constant" is actually varying in time')
Provides a unified conceptual treatment linking dark energy to scalar field models (quintessence, tachyonic fields) and to the two distinct 'cosmological constant problems' (smallness and coincidence)
Synthesizes cosmological constant/dark energy discussion with de Sitter thermodynamics, string theory landscape, and relaxation mechanisms as a coherent review
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier flatness-constraint role of Ω_Λ into a general explanatory framework for cosmic acceleration, including dynamical scalar-field models.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004404 (2000)from §A peak at ℓ≈ 200 implies a f…
“the cosmological constant, Ω_Λ (0-1);”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides an independent CMB-based constraint on Ω_m and Ω_Λ from the location of the first acoustic peak, complementing prior supernova-based measurements of Λ
Places the tightest constraint yet on Ω_0=Ω_m+Ω_Λ (0.88<Ω_0<1.12) using resolved CMB structure, supporting a flat, Euclidean universe consistent with a nonzero cosmological constant as suggested by supernova surveys
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier X-component fluid model into a broader parametrized w(a) framework, extending constraints using CMB, BAO, and SN data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“One of the most commonly used form of w(a) is a linear form (Chevallier & Polarski 2001; Linder 2003)
w(a) = w0 + (1 − a)wa, (C1) where w0 and wa parametrize the present-day value of w and the first derivative.”
“• We recover the widely used linear form, w(a) = w0 +(1−a)wa (Chevallier & Polarski 2001; Linder 2003), at late times, a > atrans.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 (2000)from §Introduction
“We will be interested in this work in some dominant X-component, which can be described as
a perfect fluid with an equation of state specified by -1<w_X≡ p_X/ρ_X<-1/3,
thus enabling that component to induce accelerated expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We find all the critical points of the system for constant equations of state in that range.
We consider further several background quantities that can distinguish the models with different w_X values.
Using a simple toy model with a varying equation of state, we show that even a large variation of w_X at small redshifts is very difficult to observe with d_L(z) measurements up to z∼1.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2010 SEVEN-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier X-component/w formalism by adding time-dependence via w0 and wa and constraining it with modern cosmological data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Time-dependent Equation of State
As for a time-dependent equation of state, we shall find constraints on the present-day value of the equation of
state and its derivative using a linear form, w(a) = w0 + wa(1−a) (Chevallier & Polarski 2001; Linder 2003).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 (2000)from §Introduction
“We will be interested in this work in some dominant X-component, which can be described as
a perfect fluid with an equation of state specified by -1<w_X≡ p_X/ρ_X<-1/3,
thus enabling that component to induce accelerated expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We find all the critical points of the system for constant equations of state in that range.
We consider further several background quantities that can distinguish the models with different w_X values.
Using a simple toy model with a varying equation of state, we show that even a large variation of w_X at small redshifts is very difficult to observe with d_L(z) measurements up to z∼1.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2007 Observational Constraints on the Nature of Dar…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier X-component/w_X framework by empirically constraining w using supernova data, extending the theoretical model observationally.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 (2000)from §Introduction
“We will be interested in this work in some dominant X-component, which can be described as
a perfect fluid with an equation of state specified by -1<w_X≡ p_X/ρ_X<-1/3,
thus enabling that component to induce accelerated expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We find all the critical points of the system for constant equations of state in that range.
We consider further several background quantities that can distinguish the models with different w_X values.
Using a simple toy model with a varying equation of state, we show that even a large variation of w_X at small redshifts is very difficult to observe with d_L(z) measurements up to z∼1.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0701041 (2007)from §Abstract
“We present constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter,
w=P/(ρ c^2),
using Type Ia supernovae from the ESSENCE supernova survey.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents first cosmological results from the ESSENCE survey constraining the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w with supernova data over redshift 0.15–0.70
Combines ESSENCE with SNLS to obtain a joint, tighter constraint on w and Ω_M consistent with a cosmological constant
Develops a redshift-dependent host-galaxy extinction prior ('glosz') derived from detailed Monte Carlo simulations of the ESSENCE selection function to reduce systematic bias in dark energy inference
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2012 NINE-YEAR <i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier constant-w negative-pressure fluid to a time-varying equation of state w(a)=w0+wa(1-a), broadening the parameterization while retaining the same dark energy concept.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“21
When w is allowed to vary with the scale factor according to w(a) = w0 + wa(1 − a) (Chevallier & Polarski 2001; Linder 2003), we find, for a flat universe20
4.6.1.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 (2000)from §Introduction
“We will be interested in this work in some dominant X-component, which can be described as
a perfect fluid with an equation of state specified by -1<w_X≡ p_X/ρ_X<-1/3,
thus enabling that component to induce accelerated expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We find all the critical points of the system for constant equations of state in that range.
We consider further several background quantities that can distinguish the models with different w_X values.
Using a simple toy model with a varying equation of state, we show that even a large variation of w_X at small redshifts is very difficult to observe with d_L(z) measurements up to z∼1.
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1212.5226 (2012)from §Introduction
“Despite its notable success at describing all current cosmological data sets, the standard model raises many questions: what is the nature of dark matter and dark energy?”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Nine-year WMAP data combined with high-l CMB, BAO, and H0 determine Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, and Ω_Λ each to ~1.5% precision
Restricting supernova data use to models examining the dark energy equation of state due to residual systematic errors in SN samples
Updated methodology for combining WMAP with SPT/ACT/BAO/H0/SNe to constrain dark energy equation of state parameters (w, w0, wa) more tightly than previous WMAP releases
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts dark energy but focuses specifically on constraining w(z) and Ω_X via BAO measurements, narrowing the general concept to an observational parameterization.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…equation of state of −1, while general quintessence models (Caldwell et al. 1998) and other theories (Zlatev et al. 1999; Bucher & Spergel 1999; Armendariz-Picon et al. 2000; Boyle et al. 2001; Gu & Hwang 2001; Kasuya 2001; Bilic et al. 2002; Deffayet et al. 2002; Freese & Lewis 2002)…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004134 (2000)from §Abstract
“Increasing evidence suggests that most of the energy density of the universe
consists of a dark energy component with negative pressure, a “cosmological
constant" that causes the cosmic expansion to accelerate.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new class of scalar field (k-essence) models where dark energy dominance emerges naturally from attractor dynamics rather than fine-tuning of parameters or initial conditions
Provides a dynamical solution to the cosmic coincidence problem by showing k-essence tracks radiation, then undergoes a sharp dynamically-triggered transition to negative pressure at matter-radiation equality
Distinguishes k-essence from quintessence tracker models by showing tracking occurs only during radiation domination, with no adjustable parameter needed to set the transition epoch
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307460 (2003)from §Introduction
“Under the premise of Friedmann equations,
this implies the existence of an energy component,
christened dark energy, with negative pressure <cit.>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
Uses a full Fisher matrix formalism to treat cosmological constraints from large-scale structure, CMB anisotropies, and supernova data simultaneously, including a time-variable equation of state, extending prior work
Provides an explicit treatment of survey data sets combined with dark energy parameter estimation, differing from previous studies
+1 more
Missing energy density to close universe
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts dark energy to the specific role of closing the universe's density budget, a narrower framing than the earlier dynamic scalar-field acceleration model.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:gr-qc/0001066 (2000)from §Introduction
“strongly support
the existence of a new kind of matter in the Universe whose energy
density not only is positive but also dominates the energy densities
of all previously known forms of matter”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that the scalar field potential U(Φ) and the coupling function F(Φ) of a scalar-tensor theory, along with the present dustlike matter density, can be uniquely reconstructed from two observable cosmological functions: the luminosity distance D_L(z) and the linear density perturbation δ_m(z)
Generalizes the quintessence/minimally-coupled scalar field reconstruction of a variable Λ-term to a more general class of scalar-tensor gravity theories where the weak-energy-condition inequality on dH^2/dz need not hold
Derives the effective gravitational constant G_eff via cosmological perturbation theory rather than post-Newtonian expansion, and shows the dilaton (dark energy) fluid remains partially clustered at small scales unlike GR quintessence which is unclustered due to free streaming
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307338 (2003)from §Introduction
“in order to make Ω=1 one requires either (i) introduction of new
form of matter(energy): dark energy or (ii) modification of gravity in the
large, so that the total energy density is equal to the critical density,
which is required by theory (inflation) or by observation (WMAP).”
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the fixed w=-1 vacuum energy into a variable equation-of-state parameter w(a), building on and expanding the earlier negative-pressure framework.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“A study of review articles written over the past twenty years reveals a growing circle of ignorance (Weinberg
1989; Carroll et al. 1992; Sahni & Starobinsky 2000; Padmanabhan 2003; Peebles & Ratra 2003; Padmanabhan 2005; Copeland et al. 2006): physicists first struggled to understand why the…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2003 Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Osc…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
Newer paper builds on the same negative-pressure dark energy concept by adding a parametrized equation of state and observational method (BAO) to constrain it.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307460 (2003)from §Introduction
“Under the premise of Friedmann equations,
this implies the existence of an energy component,
christened dark energy, with negative pressure <cit.>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
Uses a full Fisher matrix formalism to treat cosmological constraints from large-scale structure, CMB anisotropies, and supernova data simultaneously, including a time-variable equation of state, extending prior work
Provides an explicit treatment of survey data sets combined with dark energy parameter estimation, differing from previous studies
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the same negative-pressure vacuum energy concept but formalizes it as one component within a multi-parameter cosmological model, constrained via a specific equation-of-state parameter using WMAP data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“A natural explanation could be a vacuum energy density (Carroll et al. 1992), but if so, we are faced with the fine-tuning problem to explain its observed value, 120 orders of magnitude smaller than expected from field theory arguments.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0586 (2008)from §Table of Cosmological parame…
“w Dark energy equation of state, w= p_DE/ρ_DE”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The five-year data improve constraints on cosmological parameters including dark energy equation of state, with the neutrino mass limit robust to within 10% to a varying dark energy equation of state.
Ω_Λ= 0.742±0.030 is measured with improved precision compared to three-year data.
The paper considers extended models with a constant dark energy equation of state w, bounded by w>-2.5, as part of testing extensions beyond simple ΛCDM.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→1999 THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERMCosmological constant driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper focuses specifically on the cosmological constant/Λ-term formulation rather than the broader negative-pressure vacuum energy framework of the earlier paper.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0004075 (2000)from §§.§ Vacuum energy
“This equivalence is the origin of the identification of
the cosmological constant with the energy of the vacuum.
In what follows, I will use the terms “vacuum energy" and
“cosmological constant" essentially interchangeably.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a pedagogical overview of cosmology in the presence of a cosmological constant, observational constraints on its magnitude, and the physics of a small (and potentially nonzero) vacuum energy, focusing on recent developments not fully covered in earlier reviews.
Modifies the conventional dominant energy condition (using only null vectors) to avoid ruling out a negative cosmological constant, which the author argues has no physical justification for exclusion.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/9904398 (1999)from §Abstract
“Recent observations of Type 1a supernovae indicating an
accelerating universe have once more drawn attention to the
possible existence, at the present epoch, of a small positive
Λ-term (cosmological constant).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a comprehensive review of observational and theoretical aspects of a small cosmological Λ-term
Reviews more recent attempts to generate a small cosmological constant using field theoretic techniques or dynamical Λ-term modeled by scalar fields
Provides a comprehensive bibliography of recent work on Λ
The newer paper generalizes the static cosmological-constant parameter into a possibly dynamical, evolving negative-pressure component, broadening the earlier equation-of-state treatment.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“93 Recent measurements are presented in Lee et al. (2001), Netterfield et al. (2002), Halverson et al. (2002), Miller et al. (2002a), Coble
et al. (2001), Scott et al. (2002), and Mason et al. (2002).”
“101 The ΩB0h 2 values estimated from the cosmic microwave background anisotropy measured by Netterfield et al. (2002), Pryke et al.
(2002), and Stompor et al. (2001), are more consistent with the higher, deuterium based, Burles et al. (2001) range in Eqs.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0104460 (2001)from §COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
“Parameters explored include those describing energy densities, including
the total energy density Ω_tot, the vacuum energy density
Ω_Λ, and the physical densities of baryons and cold dark
matter, Ω_b h^2 and Ω_c h^2 respectively.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, larger BOOMERANG dataset (four 150 GHz channels, full flight) with improved beam and pointing characterization, enabling detection of multiple acoustic peaks and tighter constraints on Ω_tot, Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, n_s, and by extension Ω_Λ.
Combines CMB data with LSS and SN1a priors to jointly constrain Ω_Λ and other cosmological parameters, showing consistency with a Λ-dominated, low-curvature adiabatic CDM model.
Provides refined determination of Ω_Λ (~0.5–0.7 depending on priors) as part of a 7-dimensional parameter extraction using new analysis pipeline (MASTER-based power spectrum estimation).
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0207347 (2002)from §§ INTRODUCTION
“There is significant observational evidence for the detection of
Einstein's cosmological constant, Λ, or a component of
the material content of the universe that varies only slowly with
time and space and so acts like Λ. We will use the term
dark energy for Λ or a component that acts like it.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper reviews and synthesizes the physics, astronomy, and history of ideas about the cosmological constant/dark energy, assessing the observational evidence and recent developments in searching for a fundamental theory since Weinberg's 1989 review.
It discusses the possibility that dark energy is dynamical, evolving toward zero, as an approach to alleviate the fine-tuning problem of the cosmological constant.
It provides an explicit example (zero-point energy of the 3K background radiation) quantifying the magnitude of the cosmological constant problem.
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.70
→2002 Cosmological constant—the weight of the vacuumNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the cosmological constant to a broader negative-pressure dark energy component with variable equation of state, building on the earlier fixed Ω_Λ treatment.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0104460 (2001)from §COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
“Parameters explored include those describing energy densities, including
the total energy density Ω_tot, the vacuum energy density
Ω_Λ, and the physical densities of baryons and cold dark
matter, Ω_b h^2 and Ω_c h^2 respectively.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, larger BOOMERANG dataset (four 150 GHz channels, full flight) with improved beam and pointing characterization, enabling detection of multiple acoustic peaks and tighter constraints on Ω_tot, Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, n_s, and by extension Ω_Λ.
Combines CMB data with LSS and SN1a priors to jointly constrain Ω_Λ and other cosmological parameters, showing consistency with a Λ-dominated, low-curvature adiabatic CDM model.
Provides refined determination of Ω_Λ (~0.5–0.7 depending on priors) as part of a 7-dimensional parameter extraction using new analysis pipeline (MASTER-based power spectrum estimation).
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0212290 (2002)from §Framework of standard cosmol…
“An exotic form of matter
(cosmological constant or something similar) with an equation of
state p≈-ρ (that is, w ≈ -1) having a density parameter of about
Ω_Λ≈ 0.7 (marked by a filled circle in the figure).
The evidence for Ω_Λ will be discussed in section <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The review explicitly generalizes 'cosmological constant' to include time-varying dark energy scenarios ('we shall use the term cosmological constant in a generalized sense including the scenarios in which cosmological "constant" is actually varying in time')
Provides a unified conceptual treatment linking dark energy to scalar field models (quintessence, tachyonic fields) and to the two distinct 'cosmological constant problems' (smallness and coincidence)
Synthesizes cosmological constant/dark energy discussion with de Sitter thermodynamics, string theory landscape, and relaxation mechanisms as a coherent review
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2003 Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational ph…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the constant-Λ vacuum energy into a broader negative-pressure fluid parametrized by w_DE, extending the equation-of-state concept beyond a fixed cosmological constant.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0104460 (2001)from §COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
“Parameters explored include those describing energy densities, including
the total energy density Ω_tot, the vacuum energy density
Ω_Λ, and the physical densities of baryons and cold dark
matter, Ω_b h^2 and Ω_c h^2 respectively.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, larger BOOMERANG dataset (four 150 GHz channels, full flight) with improved beam and pointing characterization, enabling detection of multiple acoustic peaks and tighter constraints on Ω_tot, Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, n_s, and by extension Ω_Λ.
Combines CMB data with LSS and SN1a priors to jointly constrain Ω_Λ and other cosmological parameters, showing consistency with a Λ-dominated, low-curvature adiabatic CDM model.
Provides refined determination of Ω_Λ (~0.5–0.7 depending on priors) as part of a 7-dimensional parameter extraction using new analysis pipeline (MASTER-based power spectrum estimation).
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0306438 (2003)from §Introduction
“Cosmic speed-up can be accommodated within general relativity by
invoking a mysterious cosmic fluid with large negative pressure,
dubbed dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that tiny R^n (n<0) corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action can produce cosmic acceleration, eliminating the need for dark energy as a separate fluid component
Provides a unified purely gravitational origin for both early-time inflation (R^n, n>0) and late-time acceleration (R^n, n<0), avoiding invocation of dark energy or an inflaton field
Identifies self-accelerating vacuum solutions (de Sitter and anti-de Sitter) as alternatives to a cosmological constant, with effective equation-of-state parameters mimicking dark energy (w_DE=-1 or w_DE<-2/3) without actual dark energy
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
The newer paper generalizes dark energy beyond a fixed cosmological constant to include scalar fields, broadening the earlier Ω_Λ-based treatment while retaining it as a special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0104460 (2001)from §COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
“Parameters explored include those describing energy densities, including
the total energy density Ω_tot, the vacuum energy density
Ω_Λ, and the physical densities of baryons and cold dark
matter, Ω_b h^2 and Ω_c h^2 respectively.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, larger BOOMERANG dataset (four 150 GHz channels, full flight) with improved beam and pointing characterization, enabling detection of multiple acoustic peaks and tighter constraints on Ω_tot, Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, n_s, and by extension Ω_Λ.
Combines CMB data with LSS and SN1a priors to jointly constrain Ω_Λ and other cosmological parameters, showing consistency with a Λ-dominated, low-curvature adiabatic CDM model.
Provides refined determination of Ω_Λ (~0.5–0.7 depending on priors) as part of a 7-dimensional parameter extraction using new analysis pipeline (MASTER-based power spectrum estimation).
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307285 (2003)from §Introduction
“Thus one concludes that the remaining 70% is some mysterious agent that creates the cosmological acceleration. The simplest suggestion is that the source of this acceleration is the vacuum energy (cosmological constant).”
contestsdisputes● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2003 Modified gravity with negative and positive po…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper proposes modified gravity as an alternative that eliminates the need for the earlier paper's dark energy/cosmological constant explanation of acceleration.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0104460 (2001)from §COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
“Parameters explored include those describing energy densities, including
the total energy density Ω_tot, the vacuum energy density
Ω_Λ, and the physical densities of baryons and cold dark
matter, Ω_b h^2 and Ω_c h^2 respectively.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, larger BOOMERANG dataset (four 150 GHz channels, full flight) with improved beam and pointing characterization, enabling detection of multiple acoustic peaks and tighter constraints on Ω_tot, Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, n_s, and by extension Ω_Λ.
Combines CMB data with LSS and SN1a priors to jointly constrain Ω_Λ and other cosmological parameters, showing consistency with a Λ-dominated, low-curvature adiabatic CDM model.
Provides refined determination of Ω_Λ (~0.5–0.7 depending on priors) as part of a 7-dimensional parameter extraction using new analysis pipeline (MASTER-based power spectrum estimation).
↓ contests
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0307288 (2003)from §Introduction
“The favored explanation for this behavior is that the universe is presently dominated by some form of dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes a modified gravity model L=R+R^m+1/R^n that unifies early-time inflation (via positive powers of curvature) and late-time cosmic acceleration (via negative powers of curvature) without invoking dark energy
Claims the model avoids the instabilities present in the simpler R+1/R modified gravity model
Claims the equivalent scalar-tensor formulation can pass solar system tests, unlike the original 1/R model which is ruled out by such tests
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the generic w_X fluid framework to precise observational constraints on w(a) and curvature, focusing narrowly on data-driven bounds rather than extra-dimensional gravity comparisons.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Recently, there has been significant interest in modifications to General Relativity, in the context of explaining the acceleration of the universe (Dvali et al. 2000; Deffayet et al. 2002).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0105068 (2001)from §Cosmological Solutions
“Here, in addition to the matter and curvature contributions
we have included the density of a dark energy component Ω_X
with equation of state parameter w_X.
When w_X=-1, the dark energy acts in the same
way as a cosmological constant,
and the corresponding Ω_X will be denoted
as Ω_Λ in the following.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper proposes that cosmic acceleration can arise from gravity leaking into extra dimensions rather than from a dark energy component or cosmological constant, and shows that this mimics but is distinguishable from standard dark energy models with w_X > -1 via supernovae, Alcock-Paczynski, and CMB tests.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2003 First‐Year <i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy P…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the generic w_X fluid framework to observational constraints pinning w near -1, treating dark energy as effectively a cosmological constant.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0105068 (2001)from §Cosmological Solutions
“Here, in addition to the matter and curvature contributions
we have included the density of a dark energy component Ω_X
with equation of state parameter w_X.
When w_X=-1, the dark energy acts in the same
way as a cosmological constant,
and the corresponding Ω_X will be denoted
as Ω_Λ in the following.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper proposes that cosmic acceleration can arise from gravity leaking into extra dimensions rather than from a dark energy component or cosmological constant, and shows that this mimics but is distinguishable from standard dark energy models with w_X > -1 via supernovae, Alcock-Paczynski, and CMB tests.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2003 Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Osc…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper applies the same generic w_X dark energy parameterization but restricts focus to using BAO observations to constrain specific parameter values rather than generalizing the fluid model.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…models (Caldwell et al. 1998) and other theories (Zlatev et al. 1999; Bucher & Spergel 1999; Armendariz-Picon et al. 2000; Boyle et al. 2001; Gu & Hwang 2001; Kasuya 2001; Bilic et al. 2002; Deffayet et al. 2002; Freese & Lewis 2002) typically allow equations of state with a redshift dependence.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0105068 (2001)from §Cosmological Solutions
“Here, in addition to the matter and curvature contributions
we have included the density of a dark energy component Ω_X
with equation of state parameter w_X.
When w_X=-1, the dark energy acts in the same
way as a cosmological constant,
and the corresponding Ω_X will be denoted
as Ω_Λ in the following.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper proposes that cosmic acceleration can arise from gravity leaking into extra dimensions rather than from a dark energy component or cosmological constant, and shows that this mimics but is distinguishable from standard dark energy models with w_X > -1 via supernovae, Alcock-Paczynski, and CMB tests.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307460 (2003)from §Introduction
“Under the premise of Friedmann equations,
this implies the existence of an energy component,
christened dark energy, with negative pressure <cit.>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
Uses a full Fisher matrix formalism to treat cosmological constraints from large-scale structure, CMB anisotropies, and supernova data simultaneously, including a time-variable equation of state, extending prior work
Provides an explicit treatment of survey data sets combined with dark energy parameter estimation, differing from previous studies
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the generic w_X dark-energy fluid to a cosmological-constant-like component with observationally constrained equation of state, a special case of the earlier general treatment.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0105068 (2001)from §Cosmological Solutions
“Here, in addition to the matter and curvature contributions
we have included the density of a dark energy component Ω_X
with equation of state parameter w_X.
When w_X=-1, the dark energy acts in the same
way as a cosmological constant,
and the corresponding Ω_X will be denoted
as Ω_Λ in the following.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper proposes that cosmic acceleration can arise from gravity leaking into extra dimensions rather than from a dark energy component or cosmological constant, and shows that this mimics but is distinguishable from standard dark energy models with w_X > -1 via supernovae, Alcock-Paczynski, and CMB tests.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0586 (2008)from §Table of Cosmological parame…
“w Dark energy equation of state, w= p_DE/ρ_DE”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The five-year data improve constraints on cosmological parameters including dark energy equation of state, with the neutrino mass limit robust to within 10% to a varying dark energy equation of state.
Ω_Λ= 0.742±0.030 is measured with improved precision compared to three-year data.
The paper considers extended models with a constant dark energy equation of state w, bounded by w>-2.5, as part of testing extensions beyond simple ΛCDM.
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier fixed cosmological constant background into a broader dark energy framework with variable equation-of-state, building conceptually on the same parameterization.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“In this analysis we do not consider the Luminous Red Galaxy extension of this program to higher redshift (Eisenstein et al. 2001).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0108153 (2001)from §Introduction
“We have adopted a cosmology of Ω_m=0.33 and Λ=0.67
for the calculation of distance moduli and comoving volumes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1409.3242 (2014)from §Abstract
“This "fills the gap" in BAO distance ladder between previously measured local and higher redshift measurements, and affords significant improvement in constraining the properties of dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a 4 per cent distance measurement at z=0.15 that fills a gap in the BAO distance ladder, improving constraints on the equation of state of dark energy
Combining with other BAO measurements provides a 15 per cent improvement in determination of the equation of state of dark energy and H_0
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2006 Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminou…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the fixed cosmological constant background into a broader dark energy framework parameterized by an equation-of-state variable w, encompassing Λ as a special case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0108153 (2001)from §Introduction
“We have adopted a cosmology of Ω_m=0.33 and Λ=0.67
for the calculation of distance moduli and comoving volumes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0608632 (2006)from §Abstract
“Baryon oscillations are clearly detected and provide a robust measurement of the comoving distance
to the median survey redshift z=0.35 independent of curvature and dark energy properties.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Sharpens curvature constraint from WMAP alone (Ω_tot=1.05±0.05) to Ω_tot=1.003±0.010 using LRG power spectrum
Provides a measurement of the equation of state parameter w=-0.94±0.09 assuming flatness, independent of nonlinear scale complications
Demonstrates that baryon oscillation distance measurement to z=0.35 is robust and independent of assumptions about dark energy properties
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2005 Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the L…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier fixed cosmological-constant background into a dynamic dark energy equation-of-state framework, using similar galaxy samples as geometric probes for constraint.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“While it contains fewer galaxies than the 2dFGRS or the Main sample of the SDSS, the LRG sample (Eisenstein et al. 2001) has
Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 3
been optimized for the study of structure on the largest scales and as a result it is expected to significantly outperform those samples.”
“The selection of LRGs is highly sensitive to errors in the photometric calibration of the g, r, and i bands (Eisenstein et al. 2001).”
“The LRG algorithm (Eisenstein et al. 2001) selects ∼ 12 additional galaxies per square degree, using color-magnitude cuts in g, r, and i to select galaxies to a Petrosian magnitude r < 19.5 that are likely to be luminous early-types at redshifts up to ∼ 0.5.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0108153 (2001)from §Introduction
“We have adopted a cosmology of Ω_m=0.33 and Λ=0.67
for the calculation of distance moduli and comoving volumes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2009 Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digi…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier fixed cosmological-constant background into a broader dark energy equation-of-state framework constrained by multiple observational probes.also citing— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“For the SDSS main galaxies, with median redshift close to z 0.2, d true/dobs < 1, while for the LRGs, with median redshift z 0.35, d true/dobs > 1.”
“For the SDSS LRGs, which provide most of our cosmological signal, we take an effective redshift of z= 0.35 and assume a CDM model with m(z = 0) = 0.25, giving m(z = 0.35) = 0.45.”
“In a companion paper (Reid et al. 2009b), we apply a grouping algorithm to recover the halo power spectrum from the LRGs and then calibrate the relation of the halo power spectrum to the linear theory power spectrum using simulations.”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0108153 (2001)from §Introduction
“We have adopted a cosmology of Ω_m=0.33 and Λ=0.67
for the calculation of distance moduli and comoving volumes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0907.1660 (2009)from §Introduction
““What is the nature of dark energy?” is one of the current key
questions in physical science.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tight, robust constraints on the dark energy equation of state w=-0.97±0.10 for a constant dark energy equation of state by combining BAO, supernova, and WMAP5 data.
Shows that the BAO distance constraint on Ω_m and H_0 is independent of the behaviour of dark energy at redshifts greater than those probed by the BAO and supernova measurements.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2003 Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Osc…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier fixed-Λ background parameterization into a full dark energy equation-of-state framework for constraining cosmic acceleration.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“For the nearby universe, we adopt the parameters of the on-going SDSS luminous red galaxy survey (Eisenstein et al. 2001).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0108153 (2001)from §Introduction
“We have adopted a cosmology of Ω_m=0.33 and Λ=0.67
for the calculation of distance moduli and comoving volumes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307460 (2003)from §Introduction
“Under the premise of Friedmann equations,
this implies the existence of an energy component,
christened dark energy, with negative pressure <cit.>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
Uses a full Fisher matrix formalism to treat cosmological constraints from large-scale structure, CMB anisotropies, and supernova data simultaneously, including a time-variable equation of state, extending prior work
Provides an explicit treatment of survey data sets combined with dark energy parameter estimation, differing from previous studies
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2003 The Three‐Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxi…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier background Λ parameterization by conceptually framing it as a negative-pressure component driving acceleration, generalizing the bare parameter into a physical mechanism.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“To a good approximation, the main galaxy sample consists of all galaxies with r-band apparent Petrosian magnitude r < 17.77; see Appendix A. Galaxy spectra are also measured for a luminous red galaxy sample (Eisenstein et al. 2001), for which clustering results will be reported in a separate paper.”
“One of the goals is to spectroscopically observe 900,000 galaxies, (down to rlim ≈ 17.77; Strauss et al. 2002), 100,000 Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs; Eisenstein et al. 2001), and 100,000 QSOs (Richards et al. 2002).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0108153 (2001)from §Introduction
“We have adopted a cosmology of Ω_m=0.33 and Λ=0.67
for the calculation of distance moduli and comoving volumes.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310725 (2003)from §Introduction
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper takes the general dynamical dark-energy concept and applies precise empirical constraints on w(a), effectively narrowing it toward observationally testable special cases like w=-1.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…articles written over the past twenty years reveals a growing circle of ignorance (Weinberg
1989; Carroll et al. 1992; Sahni & Starobinsky 2000; Padmanabhan 2003; Peebles & Ratra 2003; Padmanabhan 2005; Copeland et al. 2006): physicists first struggled to understand why the cosmological…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0212290 (2002)from §Framework of standard cosmol…
“An exotic form of matter
(cosmological constant or something similar) with an equation of
state p≈-ρ (that is, w ≈ -1) having a density parameter of about
Ω_Λ≈ 0.7 (marked by a filled circle in the figure).
The evidence for Ω_Λ will be discussed in section <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The review explicitly generalizes 'cosmological constant' to include time-varying dark energy scenarios ('we shall use the term cosmological constant in a generalized sense including the scenarios in which cosmological "constant" is actually varying in time')
Provides a unified conceptual treatment linking dark energy to scalar field models (quintessence, tachyonic fields) and to the two distinct 'cosmological constant problems' (smallness and coincidence)
Synthesizes cosmological constant/dark energy discussion with de Sitter thermodynamics, string theory landscape, and relaxation mechanisms as a coherent review
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
The newer paper adopts the earlier w0-wa parametrization and applies it with new supernova data to constrain dark energy, extending its empirical use.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“For a wide range of dark energy models, it can be shown (Linder 2003) that, to good approximation, the dark energy equation-of-state can be parametrized by
w(a) = w0 + wa(1 − a) (7)
1 http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/map/dr4/parameters.cfm
19
wherea = 1/(1 + z) is a scale factor.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 (2002)from §MAPPING THE EXPANSION HISTOR…
“Observational evidence for accelerated
expansion informs us that there must
be a component with
a strongly negative EOS – “dark energy” – in addition to matter.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, advantageous parametrization w(a) = w_0+w_a(1-a) for the study of dark energy that reduces to linear behavior at low redshift, remains bounded at high redshift, and accurately reconstructs scalar field models like SUGRA to high precision even at the last scattering surface.
Shows this parametrization allows CMB information to be incorporated naturally without artificial cutoffs, unlike the linear w_1 parametrization.
Proposes dw/dln(1+z) at z=1 as a natural, physically motivated measure of dark energy time variation related to the scalar field potential slow-roll factor.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1105.3470 (2011)from §Abstract
“Fourteen of these pass our strict selection cuts
and are used in combination with the world's sample of to
derive the best current constraints on dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Adding these supernovae improves the best combined constraint on dark energy density, ρ_DE(z), at redshifts 1.0 < z < 1.6 by 18% (including systematic errors).
Nearly doubling the statistical weight of HST-discovered SNe Ia beyond z=1.
Corrects for the recently identified correlation between luminosity and host galaxy mass and corrects the NICMOS zeropoint at count rates appropriate for very distant SNe Ia.
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the earlier w0-wa parametrization and applies it with observational data (CMB, BAO, SNe) to constrain w and curvature, building on the original formulation.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“One of the most commonly used form of w(a) is a linear form (Chevallier & Polarski 2001; Linder 2003)
w(a) = w0 + (1 − a)wa, (C1) where w0 and wa parametrize the present-day value of w and the first derivative.”
“• We recover the widely used linear form, w(a) = w0 +(1−a)wa (Chevallier & Polarski 2001; Linder 2003), at late times, a > atrans.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 (2002)from §MAPPING THE EXPANSION HISTOR…
“Observational evidence for accelerated
expansion informs us that there must
be a component with
a strongly negative EOS – “dark energy” – in addition to matter.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, advantageous parametrization w(a) = w_0+w_a(1-a) for the study of dark energy that reduces to linear behavior at low redshift, remains bounded at high redshift, and accurately reconstructs scalar field models like SUGRA to high precision even at the last scattering surface.
Shows this parametrization allows CMB information to be incorporated naturally without artificial cutoffs, unlike the linear w_1 parametrization.
Proposes dw/dln(1+z) at z=1 as a natural, physically motivated measure of dark energy time variation related to the scalar field potential slow-roll factor.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2010 SEVEN-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the same w0-wa parametrization but extends it by applying observational constraints from CMB, BAO, H0, supernova, and lensing data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Time-dependent Equation of State
As for a time-dependent equation of state, we shall find constraints on the present-day value of the equation of
state and its derivative using a linear form, w(a) = w0 + wa(1−a) (Chevallier & Polarski 2001; Linder 2003).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 (2002)from §MAPPING THE EXPANSION HISTOR…
“Observational evidence for accelerated
expansion informs us that there must
be a component with
a strongly negative EOS – “dark energy” – in addition to matter.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, advantageous parametrization w(a) = w_0+w_a(1-a) for the study of dark energy that reduces to linear behavior at low redshift, remains bounded at high redshift, and accurately reconstructs scalar field models like SUGRA to high precision even at the last scattering surface.
Shows this parametrization allows CMB information to be incorporated naturally without artificial cutoffs, unlike the linear w_1 parametrization.
Proposes dw/dln(1+z) at z=1 as a natural, physically motivated measure of dark energy time variation related to the scalar field potential slow-roll factor.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2010 SPECTRA AND<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>LIGHT …Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the earlier w0-wa parametrization but restricts analysis to constraining a single w value using SNe Ia data, a special-case application.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“It can be shown (Linder 2003) that this parameterization provides an excellent approximation to a wide variety of dark energy models.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 (2002)from §MAPPING THE EXPANSION HISTOR…
“Observational evidence for accelerated
expansion informs us that there must
be a component with
a strongly negative EOS – “dark energy” – in addition to matter.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, advantageous parametrization w(a) = w_0+w_a(1-a) for the study of dark energy that reduces to linear behavior at low redshift, remains bounded at high redshift, and accurately reconstructs scalar field models like SUGRA to high precision even at the last scattering surface.
Shows this parametrization allows CMB information to be incorporated naturally without artificial cutoffs, unlike the linear w_1 parametrization.
Proposes dw/dln(1+z) at z=1 as a natural, physically motivated measure of dark energy time variation related to the scalar field potential slow-roll factor.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1004.1711 (2010)from §Abstract
“In particular, at z ≳ 1, the existence and nature
of dark energy are only weakly constrained by the data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents new light curves and spectra of six SNe Ia discovered in 2001, including ground-based J-band photometry for two SNe with z>1
Combines these new SNe with other recent data into an improved compilation called Union2, consisting of 557 supernovae
Refits all light curves with the SALT2 fitter and improves handling of systematic errors compared to the earlier Union compilation
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2014 Improved cosmological constraints from a joint…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the earlier w0-wa parametrization but applies it observationally without committing to its physical interpretation, treating it as one specific model among broader possibilities.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The two-parameter extension allowing for dark energy in a spatially flat universe with a time varying equation of state parameter parameterized as w(a) = w0 + wa(1 − a) with a = 1/(1 + z) (Linder 2003) and labeled wz-CDM.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 (2002)from §MAPPING THE EXPANSION HISTOR…
“Observational evidence for accelerated
expansion informs us that there must
be a component with
a strongly negative EOS – “dark energy” – in addition to matter.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, advantageous parametrization w(a) = w_0+w_a(1-a) for the study of dark energy that reduces to linear behavior at low redshift, remains bounded at high redshift, and accurately reconstructs scalar field models like SUGRA to high precision even at the last scattering surface.
Shows this parametrization allows CMB information to be incorporated naturally without artificial cutoffs, unlike the linear w_1 parametrization.
Proposes dw/dln(1+z) at z=1 as a natural, physically motivated measure of dark energy time variation related to the scalar field potential slow-roll factor.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1401.4064 (2014)from §Introduction
“The reason for the acceleration remains unknown, and the term “dark
energy” is used to describe the
phenomenon.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
When combined with CMB constraints, we measure a constant dark-energy equation of state parameter w=-1.018 ± 0.057(stat+sys) for a flat universe.
Our supernova measurements provide the most stringent constraints to date on the nature of dark energy.
Section uses additional astrophysical probes in combination with SNe Ia to break degeneracies and constrain dark energy in more generic models.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2003 Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Osc…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier w(z) equation-of-state framework, applying it to constrain dark energy parameters via baryon acoustic oscillation survey data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Other choices for parameterizing the free function w(z) have been explored in Tegmark (2001), Linder (2003), and Huterer & Starkman (2003).”
“It differs from Linder (2003) in that it is an explicit treatment of the survey data sets in addition to a discussion of dark energy parameter estimation.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 (2002)from §MAPPING THE EXPANSION HISTOR…
“Observational evidence for accelerated
expansion informs us that there must
be a component with
a strongly negative EOS – “dark energy” – in addition to matter.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, advantageous parametrization w(a) = w_0+w_a(1-a) for the study of dark energy that reduces to linear behavior at low redshift, remains bounded at high redshift, and accurately reconstructs scalar field models like SUGRA to high precision even at the last scattering surface.
Shows this parametrization allows CMB information to be incorporated naturally without artificial cutoffs, unlike the linear w_1 parametrization.
Proposes dw/dln(1+z) at z=1 as a natural, physically motivated measure of dark energy time variation related to the scalar field potential slow-roll factor.
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307460 (2003)from §Introduction
“Under the premise of Friedmann equations,
this implies the existence of an energy component,
christened dark energy, with negative pressure <cit.>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
Uses a full Fisher matrix formalism to treat cosmological constraints from large-scale structure, CMB anisotropies, and supernova data simultaneously, including a time-variable equation of state, extending prior work
Provides an explicit treatment of survey data sets combined with dark energy parameter estimation, differing from previous studies
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2004 Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper applies the earlier general time-varying equation-of-state framework to observational constraints, treating dark energy as a specific parameterized case tested against data.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 (2002)from §MAPPING THE EXPANSION HISTOR…
“Observational evidence for accelerated
expansion informs us that there must
be a component with
a strongly negative EOS – “dark energy” – in addition to matter.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, advantageous parametrization w(a) = w_0+w_a(1-a) for the study of dark energy that reduces to linear behavior at low redshift, remains bounded at high redshift, and accurately reconstructs scalar field models like SUGRA to high precision even at the last scattering surface.
Shows this parametrization allows CMB information to be incorporated naturally without artificial cutoffs, unlike the linear w_1 parametrization.
Proposes dw/dln(1+z) at z=1 as a natural, physically motivated measure of dark energy time variation related to the scalar field potential slow-roll factor.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0407372 (2004)from §Introduction
“A third theoretical prediction of departures from the standard model, and
one whose consequences would be particularly far reaching, is that
dark energy is not simply a cosmological constant introduced
already by Einstein, but something more complicated and dynamical in
nature.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We explore dark energy constraints in models with a fairly general time dependence of dark energy equation of state, finding Ω_λ=0.72± 0.02, w(z=0.3)=-0.98^+0.10_-0.12
One method to constrain the nature of dark energy that has not attracted much attention, yet has the potential to produce results on a relatively short time scale, is comparing measurements of amplitude of fluctuations at high redshift from the Lyα forest and CMB to that at low redshift from galaxy clustering.
We find no evidence for variation of the equation of state with redshift, w(z=1)=-1.03^+0.21_-0.28.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.65
→2007 Observational Constraints on the Nature of Dar…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper applies the earlier w0-wa parametrization empirically via supernova data specifically to test the special case w=-1 (cosmological constant), narrowing the general framework.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“We here provide the global constraints
– 34 –
on models characterized by w = w0+wa(1−a) (Linder 2003; Albrecht et al. 2006).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 (2002)from §MAPPING THE EXPANSION HISTOR…
“Observational evidence for accelerated
expansion informs us that there must
be a component with
a strongly negative EOS – “dark energy” – in addition to matter.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents a new, advantageous parametrization w(a) = w_0+w_a(1-a) for the study of dark energy that reduces to linear behavior at low redshift, remains bounded at high redshift, and accurately reconstructs scalar field models like SUGRA to high precision even at the last scattering surface.
Shows this parametrization allows CMB information to be incorporated naturally without artificial cutoffs, unlike the linear w_1 parametrization.
Proposes dw/dln(1+z) at z=1 as a natural, physically motivated measure of dark energy time variation related to the scalar field potential slow-roll factor.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0701041 (2007)from §Abstract
“We present constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter,
w=P/(ρ c^2),
using Type Ia supernovae from the ESSENCE supernova survey.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents first cosmological results from the ESSENCE survey constraining the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w with supernova data over redshift 0.15–0.70
Combines ESSENCE with SNLS to obtain a joint, tighter constraint on w and Ω_M consistent with a cosmological constant
Develops a redshift-dependent host-galaxy extinction prior ('glosz') derived from detailed Monte Carlo simulations of the ESSENCE selection function to reduce systematic bias in dark energy inference
+2 more
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper operationalizes the earlier general dynamical dark-energy concept into a specific parametrized equation-of-state framework constrained tightly by observational data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…over the past twenty years reveals a growing circle of ignorance (Weinberg
1989; Carroll et al. 1992; Sahni & Starobinsky 2000; Padmanabhan 2003; Peebles & Ratra 2003; Padmanabhan 2005; Copeland et al. 2006): physicists first struggled to understand why the cosmological constant or vacuum…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0207347 (2002)from §§ INTRODUCTION
“There is significant observational evidence for the detection of
Einstein's cosmological constant, Λ, or a component of
the material content of the universe that varies only slowly with
time and space and so acts like Λ. We will use the term
dark energy for Λ or a component that acts like it.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper reviews and synthesizes the physics, astronomy, and history of ideas about the cosmological constant/dark energy, assessing the observational evidence and recent developments in searching for a fundamental theory since Weinberg's 1989 review.
It discusses the possibility that dark energy is dynamical, evolving toward zero, as an approach to alleviate the fine-tuning problem of the cosmological constant.
It provides an explicit example (zero-point energy of the 3K background radiation) quantifying the magnitude of the cosmological constant problem.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
The newer paper builds on the earlier flat-universe missing-energy framing by specifying dark energy's negative-pressure equation of state driving acceleration, broadening candidate models beyond simple energy addition.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“23), it follows that f (R) theory in the metric formalism is equivalent to BD theory with the parameter ωBD = 0 [467, 579, 152] (in the unit κ 2 = 1).”
“Hence f (R) theory in the metric formalism corresponds to BD theory with ωBD = 0 [467, 579, 152, 246, 112].”
“The f (R) gravity in the metric formalism corresponds to generalized Brans–Dicke (BD) theory [100] with a BD parameter ωBD = 0 [467, 579, 152].”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307338 (2003)from §Introduction
“in order to make Ω=1 one requires either (i) introduction of new
form of matter(energy): dark energy or (ii) modification of gravity in the
large, so that the total energy density is equal to the critical density,
which is required by theory (inflation) or by observation (WMAP).”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2006 INTRODUCTION TO MODIFIED GRAVITY AND GRAVITATI…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier missing-energy framing, reinterpreting dark energy as the driver of acceleration and expanding alternatives via modified gravity theories.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307338 (2003)from §Introduction
“in order to make Ω=1 one requires either (i) introduction of new
form of matter(energy): dark energy or (ii) modification of gravity in the
large, so that the total energy density is equal to the critical density,
which is required by theory (inflation) or by observation (WMAP).”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0601213 (2006)from §INTRODUCTION
“The dark energy problem (for recent review see <cit.>)
or, why current universe is expanding with the acceleration,
is considered to be the one of the most fundamental theoretical problems
of XXI century.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Reviews modified gravities (f(R), f(G), f(R,G), non-linear gravitational coupling, string-inspired Gauss-Bonnet-dilaton models) as gravitational alternatives to dark energy that can pass Solar System tests while producing rich late-time cosmology.
Shows such theories can naturally describe cosmological constant, quintessence, or phantom late-time eras with transition from deceleration to acceleration due to gravitational terms increasing as curvature decreases.
Proposes that the coincidence problem can be explained as a manifestation of universe expansion within modified gravity/non-linear coupling models.
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.68
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier idea of missing energy density by specifying its physical nature (negative pressure, acceleration) and broadening it into multiple dynamical models.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307338 (2003)from §Introduction
“in order to make Ω=1 one requires either (i) introduction of new
form of matter(energy): dark energy or (ii) modification of gravity in the
large, so that the total energy density is equal to the critical density,
which is required by theory (inflation) or by observation (WMAP).”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2003 Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational ph…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts dark energy to a specific negative-pressure fluid with equation-of-state w_DE, versus the earlier generic missing-energy-density concept.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307338 (2003)from §Introduction
“in order to make Ω=1 one requires either (i) introduction of new
form of matter(energy): dark energy or (ii) modification of gravity in the
large, so that the total energy density is equal to the critical density,
which is required by theory (inflation) or by observation (WMAP).”
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0306438 (2003)from §Introduction
“Cosmic speed-up can be accommodated within general relativity by
invoking a mysterious cosmic fluid with large negative pressure,
dubbed dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that tiny R^n (n<0) corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action can produce cosmic acceleration, eliminating the need for dark energy as a separate fluid component
Provides a unified purely gravitational origin for both early-time inflation (R^n, n>0) and late-time acceleration (R^n, n<0), avoiding invocation of dark energy or an inflaton field
Identifies self-accelerating vacuum solutions (de Sitter and anti-de Sitter) as alternatives to a cosmological constant, with effective equation-of-state parameters mimicking dark energy (w_DE=-1 or w_DE<-2/3) without actual dark energy
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2011 Modified gravity and cosmologyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper specializes dark energy from a general missing-density solution into a specific negative-pressure component causing observed acceleration within GR., refining scope.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“This was shown in an early paper on the subject in [292], and is the familiar limit of theories in which a scalar degree of freedom has low mass.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307338 (2003)from §Introduction
“in order to make Ω=1 one requires either (i) introduction of new
form of matter(energy): dark energy or (ii) modification of gravity in the
large, so that the total energy density is equal to the critical density,
which is required by theory (inflation) or by observation (WMAP).”
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1106.2476 (2011)from §Introduction
“More recently, `dark energy' has also been found to be required in
order to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the
Universe.”
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general phenomenological dark energy framework to observational constraints favoring w≈-1, a special case of the earlier broader model space.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0301273 (2003)from §Introduction
“Cosmological observations strongly indicate that the universe is
dominated by a smoothly distributed, slowly varying dark energy component”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Investigates whether phantom dark energy models with w<-1, naively unstable due to negative kinetic terms, could be phenomenologically viable when treated as effective field theories valid only up to a momentum cutoff
Calculates the tree-level decay rate of a phantom particle into other phantoms and gravitons, showing it is naively infinite but can be rendered finite with a cutoff
Shows that under optimistic assumptions (approximate shift symmetry), the instability timescale can exceed the age of the universe only if the cutoff is at or below 100 MeV, providing a quantitative bound on viable phantom dark energy models
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
The newer paper restricts the earlier detailed equation-of-state treatment of dark energy to a simple fixed background parameter used for simulation setup without further elaboration.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…fluctuations seen at z ∼ 1000 (e.g. Spergel et al. 2003), the power spectrum of the low-redshift galaxy distribution (e.g. Percival et al. 2002; Tegmark et al. 2004), the non-linear mass distribution at low redshift as characterized by cosmic shear (e.g. Van Waerbeke et al. 2002) and the…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310723 (2003)from §VANILLA ΛCDM MODELS
“negligible neutrino masses (f_ν=0) and dark energy corresponding to a pure cosmological
constant (w=-1).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper explores dropping the assumption w=-1 (testing dark energy equation of state) as one of several priors, showing how SDSS data help constrain the dark energy equation of state parameter w when combined with WMAP.
Provides explicit parameterization and derived-quantity table (Table 1) defining Ω_Λ as dark energy density and w as dark energy equation of state, approximated as constant, to clarify the physical origin of cosmological constraints.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0508046 (2005)from §Simulation characteristics
“Similarly, Ω_ b and Ω_Λ denote the densities of baryons
and dark energy at the present day.”
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
The newer paper broadens the earlier equation-of-state framework to include modified-gravity and quintessence alternatives beyond the cosmological constant case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310723 (2003)from §VANILLA ΛCDM MODELS
“negligible neutrino masses (f_ν=0) and dark energy corresponding to a pure cosmological
constant (w=-1).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper explores dropping the assumption w=-1 (testing dark energy equation of state) as one of several priors, showing how SDSS data help constrain the dark energy equation of state parameter w when combined with WMAP.
Provides explicit parameterization and derived-quantity table (Table 1) defining Ω_Λ as dark energy density and w as dark energy equation of state, approximated as constant, to clarify the physical origin of cosmological constraints.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
contestsdisputes● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.68
→2007 Extended theories of gravity and their cosmolo…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper reframes dark energy's negative pressure as possibly a GR breakdown artifact, disputing the standard equation-of-state cosmological-constant explanation.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310723 (2003)from §VANILLA ΛCDM MODELS
“negligible neutrino masses (f_ν=0) and dark energy corresponding to a pure cosmological
constant (w=-1).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper explores dropping the assumption w=-1 (testing dark energy equation of state) as one of several priors, showing how SDSS data help constrain the dark energy equation of state parameter w when combined with WMAP.
Provides explicit parameterization and derived-quantity table (Table 1) defining Ω_Λ as dark energy density and w as dark energy equation of state, approximated as constant, to clarify the physical origin of cosmological constraints.
↓ contests
Later paper says · arXiv:0706.1146 (2007)from §Introduction
“If combined with constraints coming
from galaxy clusters on the matter density parameter Ω_M,
these data indicate that the Universe is dominated by a
non-clustered fluid with negative pressure, generically dubbed
dark energy, which is able to drive the accelerated
expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes that dark energy and dark matter could be reinterpreted as 'shortcomings' of General Relativity rather than as real exotic components, and that extending gravity (via f(R) and scalar-tensor Extended Theories of Gravity) can reproduce accelerated expansion and other 'dark' phenomena as curvature effects.
Claims that dark energy and quintessence issues can be addressed as curvature effects within Extended Theories of Gravity, offering cosmological models fitted to observational data without adding unknown exotic ingredients to the cosmic pie.
Argues for changing the gravitational side of Einstein's equations (via non-linear Lagrangians) rather than the matter side, as a simpler alternative to invoking dark energy/dark matter.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes dark energy beyond the cosmological constant equation-of-state framework to a broader class of negative-pressure models causing acceleration.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310723 (2003)from §VANILLA ΛCDM MODELS
“negligible neutrino masses (f_ν=0) and dark energy corresponding to a pure cosmological
constant (w=-1).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper explores dropping the assumption w=-1 (testing dark energy equation of state) as one of several priors, showing how SDSS data help constrain the dark energy equation of state parameter w when combined with WMAP.
Provides explicit parameterization and derived-quantity table (Table 1) defining Ω_Λ as dark energy density and w as dark energy equation of state, approximated as constant, to clarify the physical origin of cosmological constraints.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
The newer paper challenges the cosmological-constant/material dark energy interpretation, proposing modified-gravity geometry as an alternative explanation for acceleration, including w<-1 regimes.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“se is currently accelerating. This observation finds support in the luminosity measurements of highredshift supernovae [1], measurements of degree-scale anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background [2] and, indirectly, in the observations of gravitational clustering [3]. Although a cosmological constant appears to satisfy all current observations, the form…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ contests
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0202346 (2002)from §Abstract
“Braneworld models admit a wider range
of possibilities for dark energy than standard LCDM.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Braneworld models admit a wider range of possibilities for dark energy than standard LCDM, including luminosity distances both smaller and larger than in LCDM.
Braneworld dark energy can have effective equation of state w < -1 without the undesirable properties of phantom energy models.
For a subclass of parameter values, braneworld dark energy and cosmic acceleration are transient phenomena, with the universe re-entering matter domination at late times, potentially reconciling acceleration with string/M-theory.
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2005 The many lives of active galactic nuclei: cool…Cosmological constant background parameter
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper reduces dark energy's detailed equation-of-state treatment to a fixed background parameter Ω_Λ used only for setting simulation initial conditions.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“We adopt cosmological parameter values consistent with a combined analysis of the 2-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) (Colless et al. 2001) and first-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data (Spergel et al. 2003; Seljak et al. 2005).”
“This model can simultaneously match the microwave background fluctuations seen at z ∼ 1000 (e.g. Spergel et al. 2003), the power spectrum of the low-redshift galaxy distribution (e.g. Percival et al. 2002; Tegmark et al. 2004), the non-linear mass distribution at low redshift as characterized by…”
“Thus in our model the mass fraction in baryons associated with every halo is taken to be f b = 17 per cent, consistent with the first-year WMAP result (Spergel et al. 2003).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0508046 (2005)from §Simulation characteristics
“Similarly, Ω_ b and Ω_Λ denote the densities of baryons
and dark energy at the present day.”
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
The newer paper broadens dark energy from a constrained equation-of-state parameter to a general negative-pressure phenomenon, incorporating additional candidate explanations like f(R) gravity and quintessence.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
contestsdisputes● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2007 Extended theories of gravity and their cosmolo…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper disputes the need for dark energy as an exotic fluid, proposing curvature effects in extended gravity instead of the earlier equation-of-state characterization.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ contests
Later paper says · arXiv:0706.1146 (2007)from §Introduction
“If combined with constraints coming
from galaxy clusters on the matter density parameter Ω_M,
these data indicate that the Universe is dominated by a
non-clustered fluid with negative pressure, generically dubbed
dark energy, which is able to drive the accelerated
expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes that dark energy and dark matter could be reinterpreted as 'shortcomings' of General Relativity rather than as real exotic components, and that extending gravity (via f(R) and scalar-tensor Extended Theories of Gravity) can reproduce accelerated expansion and other 'dark' phenomena as curvature effects.
Claims that dark energy and quintessence issues can be addressed as curvature effects within Extended Theories of Gravity, offering cosmological models fitted to observational data without adding unknown exotic ingredients to the cosmic pie.
Argues for changing the gravitational side of Einstein's equations (via non-linear Lagrangians) rather than the matter side, as a simpler alternative to invoking dark energy/dark matter.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.68
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes the earlier w≈-1 cosmological constant treatment into a broader class of negative-pressure components including dynamical alternatives beyond the constant case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2004 How do galaxies get their gas?Cosmological constant background parameter
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper reduces the earlier detailed equation-of-state analysis of dark energy to a fixed background parameter in a ΛCDM simulation, without developing the concept further.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“We have recently repeated one of our runs using the parameter values implied by the WMAP analysis
of Spergel et al. (2003), and preliminary investigation shows results similar to those reported here.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0407095 (2004)from §Simulations and Numerical Me…
“We adopt an inflationary cold dark matter model dominated by a cosmological
constant, ΛCDM, with
Ω_m=0.4, Ω_Λ=0.6,
h≡ H_0/(100 km s^-1 Mpc^-1)=0.65,
and a primordial power spectrum index n=0.93.”
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2005 Breaking the hierarchy of galaxy formationCosmological constant background parameter
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper reduces dark energy from an observationally constrained equation-of-state component to a simple fixed background parameter Ω_Λ used in simulation setup.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“These indicate values twice as large (Spergel et al. 2003, 2006; Cuoco et al. 2004; Sanchez et al. 2006).”
“…1977, MNRAS, 179, 541 Sanchez A., Baugh C. M., Percival W. J., Peacock J. A., Padilla N. D., Cole
S., Frenk C. S., Norberg P., 2006, MNRAS, 366, 189 Spergel et al., 2003, ApJ, 148, 175 Spergel et al., 2006, preprint (astro-ph/0603449) Silk J., 1977, ApJ, 211, 638 Silk J., Rees M. J., 1998, A&A,…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0511338 (2005)from §Introduction
“Throughout the paper, we adopt the cosmological model assumed
in the Millennium simulation: a flat universe in which the density of cold dark
matter, baryons and dark energy (in units of the critical density),
have the values Ω_
b=0.045, Ω_ m=Ω_ CDM+Ω_ b=0.25 and
Ω_Λ =0.75 respectively”
contestsdisputes● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2003 Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational ph…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper frames dark energy as a fluid explanation and proposes an alternative gravitational modification that eliminates the need for it, disputing the standard equation-of-state approach.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ contests
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0306438 (2003)from §Introduction
“Cosmic speed-up can be accommodated within general relativity by
invoking a mysterious cosmic fluid with large negative pressure,
dubbed dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Shows that tiny R^n (n<0) corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action can produce cosmic acceleration, eliminating the need for dark energy as a separate fluid component
Provides a unified purely gravitational origin for both early-time inflation (R^n, n>0) and late-time acceleration (R^n, n<0), avoiding invocation of dark energy or an inflaton field
Identifies self-accelerating vacuum solutions (de Sitter and anti-de Sitter) as alternatives to a cosmological constant, with effective equation-of-state parameters mimicking dark energy (w_DE=-1 or w_DE<-2/3) without actual dark energy
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2011 Modified gravity and cosmologyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens dark energy's characterization from a WMAP-constrained equation-of-state parameter to a general negative-pressure component motivating modified gravity, building on the earlier framing.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The CMB angular power spectrum has a lack of large-scale power above 60 [1172] (although the statistical significance of this is debatable, due to cosmic variance).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1106.2476 (2011)from §Introduction
“More recently, `dark energy' has also been found to be required in
order to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the
Universe.”
renamessame idea, new name● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.45
Both describe dark energy via an equation-of-state parameter constrained by CMB data, with the newer paper reframing it as a negative-pressure component without substantive extension.'— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ renames
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.50
→2003 The Three‐Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxi…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the earlier equation-of-state-based dark energy constraints but applies them narrowly to a flat, dark-energy-dominated cosmology for galaxy survey modeling rather than general equation-of-state analysis.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…baryonic wiggles in the galaxy power spectrum is presented by Percival et al. (2001) and Miller et al. (2001a,b, 2002), and cosmological models have been further constrained in conjunction with cosmic microwave background (CMB) data (e.g., Spergel et al. 2003; Verde et al. 2003; Lahav et al. 2002).”
“…constraints are crucially needed for breaking CMB degeneracies (Eisenstein et al. 1999; Efstathiou & Bond 1999; Bridle et al. 2003); for instance, WMAP alone is consistent with a closed universe with Hubble parameter h = 0.32 and no cosmological constant (Spergel et al. 2003; Verde et al. 2003).”
“…& Strauss 1998) can provide powerful constraints on the Hubble parameter (Eisenstein et al. 1998) and accurate determination of the shape of P (k) can place strong constraints on neutrino masses (Hu et al. 1998; Spergel et al. 2003; Hannestad 2003) and help pin down the primordial power spectrum.”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310725 (2003)from §Introduction
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
The newer paper broadens dark energy from a fixed w=-1 prior to a constrained component with a variable equation of state using additional data sets.','confidence— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302225 (2003)from §Determining the power spectr…
“The priors on the model are: a flat universe, a cosmological constant
equation of state for the dark energy, and a restriction of
τ<0.3.”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier CMB-based constraint on dark energy's equation of state by adding BAO distance measurements and alternative gravity explanations.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…by Ade et al. (2013b) that are based on the combination of data from the Planck Satellite, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite (Bennett et al. 2003; Spergel et al. 2003) polarization measurements (Bennett et al. 2013), and high-` power spectra data from ACT (Das et al. 2014)…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1409.3242 (2014)from §Abstract
“This "fills the gap" in BAO distance ladder between previously measured local and higher redshift measurements, and affords significant improvement in constraining the properties of dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a 4 per cent distance measurement at z=0.15 that fills a gap in the BAO distance ladder, improving constraints on the equation of state of dark energy
Combining with other BAO measurements provides a 15 per cent improvement in determination of the equation of state of dark energy and H_0
○ The check ran against the text this system pulled out of the papers and could not find one of these quotes, so this relationship is shown as inferred, never as verified.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier CMB-constrained dark energy component by adding BAO/SN data and a time-varying equation of state parameter w(a).— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…St., Providence, RI 02912-1843 14 UCLA Physics & Astronomy, PO Box 951547, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP; Bennett et al. 2003a,b), and ground and balloon-borne experiments (Miller et al. 1999, 2002; de Bernardis et al. 2000; Hanany et al. 2000;…”
“…(Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999) and the angular diameter distances measured from the BAO (Eisenstein et al. 2005) as well as CMB (Bennett et al. 2003b) are put together in the context of homogeneous and isotropic cosmological models, one cannot fit these distances without having…”
“The important difference between the new mask and the previous Kp0 mask (Bennett et al. 2003c) is that the new mask is defined by the difference between the K band map and the Internal Linear Combination (ILC) map, and that between the Q band and ILC.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2003 First‐Year <i>Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy P…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general dark energy equation-of-state treatment to observationally constrain w near -1, effectively specializing it to the cosmological constant case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 (2003)from §Introduction
“In this model the Universe is spatially flat, homogeneous and
isotropic on large scales, composed of radiation,
ordinary matter (electrons, protons, neutrons and neutrinos),
non-baryonic cold dark matter, and dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
By combining WMAP data with other astronomical data, we constrain the geometry of the universe: Ω_tot = 1.02 ± 0.02, and the equation of state of the dark energy, w < -0.78 (95% confidence limit assuming w ≥ -1.)
we examine non-flat models, dark energy models in which the properties of the dark energy are parameterized by an effective equation of state
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2010 SEVEN-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
Newer paper builds on the same dark-energy equation-of-state framework, adding time-evolution parameters w0 and wa with more data sets.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“While we have not detected the SZ power spectrum in the WMAP data, we have detected the SZ signal from the Coma cluster (Abell 1656) in the 1-year (Bennett et al. 2003c) and 3-year (Hinshaw et al. 2007) data.”
“We have also made a statistical detection of the SZ effect by cross-correlating the WMAP data with the locations of known clusters in the X-ray Brightest Abell-type Cluster (XBAC; Ebeling et al. 1996) catalog (Bennett et al. 2003c; Hinshaw et al. 2007).”
“The WMAP satellite (Bennett et al. 2003a,b) has been measuring temperature and polarization anisotropies of the CMB over the full sky since 2001.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2005 Simulations of the formation, evolution and cl…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier energy-density/equation-of-state framework by adding a specific field/cosmological-constant interpretation and BAO-based constraints.iframe— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0504097 (2005)from §Main text (introduction)
“During the past two decades, the cold dark matter (CDM) model,
augmented with a dark energy field (which may take the form of a
cosmological constant `Λ'), has developed into the standard
theoretical paradigm for galaxy formation.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryon-induced features in the initial conditions are reflected in distorted form in the low-redshift galaxy distribution, an effect that can be used to constrain the nature of dark energy with next generation surveys.
Shows for the first time that baryon-induced oscillations detected in the CMB power spectrum survive in distorted form not only in the nonlinear dark matter power spectrum but also in realistically selected galaxy samples at 0<z<3, providing a basis for future surveys to constrain the equation of state of dark energy.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2005 Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the L…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on CMB-based dark energy density constraints by adding acoustic-scale geometric measurements to further constrain the equation-of-state parameter.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…background (CMB) anisotropy power spectrum have emerged as one of the strongest cosmological probes (Miller et al. 1999; de Bernardis et al. 2000; Hanany et al. 2000; Halverson et al. 2001; Lee et al. 2001; Netterfield et al. 2002; Benôit et al. 2003; Pearson et al. 2003; Bennett et al. 2003).”
“The WMAP data (Bennett et al. 2003), as well as combinations of WMAP with large-scale structure (Spergel et al. 2003; Tegmark et al. 2004b), the Lyman-alpha forest (McDonald et al. 2004; Seljak et al. 2004), and big bang nucleosynthesis (e.g., Burles et al. 2001; Coc et al. 2004), constrain Ωbh
2…”
“As most of our distance leverage is coming from the acoustic scale, the most robust distance measurement we can quote is the ratio of the distance to z = 0.35 to the distance to z = 1089 (the redshift of decoupling, Bennett et al. 2003).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2004 How do galaxies get their gas?Cosmological constant background parameter
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the earlier general dark energy/equation-of-state framework but restricts it to the special-case cosmological constant used merely as fixed background for simulations.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Our values of b, n and σ 8 are close to those inferred by recent joint analysis of CMB anisotropy measurements from WMAP (Bennett et al. 2003) and galaxy clustering data from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS; Colless et al. 2001) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000),…”
“We have recently repeated one of our runs using the parameter values implied by the WMAP analysis
of Spergel et al. (2003), and preliminary investigation shows results similar to those reported here.”
“Our values of b, n and σ 8 are close to those inferred by recent joint analysis of CMB anisotropy measurements from WMAP (Bennett et al. 2003) and galaxy clustering data from the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS; Colless et al. 2001) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; York et al. 2000), while our assumed m is higher by ∼1.5σ .”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0407095 (2004)from §Simulations and Numerical Me…
“We adopt an inflationary cold dark matter model dominated by a cosmological
constant, ΛCDM, with
Ω_m=0.4, Ω_Λ=0.6,
h≡ H_0/(100 km s^-1 Mpc^-1)=0.65,
and a primordial power spectrum index n=0.93.”
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2003 Probing Dark Energy with Baryonic Acoustic Osc…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the same dark energy equation-of-state concept, adding BAO-based methodology to constrain w(z) beyond CMB constraints.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…& Yu 1970; Bond & Efstathiou 1984; Miller et al. 1999; de Bernardis et al. 2000; Hanany et al. 2000; Halverson et al. 2002; Benôit et al. 2003; Bennett et al. 2003); however, the same structure is predicted to be present in the late-time clustering of galaxies as a series of weak modulations…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307460 (2003)from §Introduction
“Under the premise of Friedmann equations,
this implies the existence of an energy component,
christened dark energy, with negative pressure <cit.>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
Uses a full Fisher matrix formalism to treat cosmological constraints from large-scale structure, CMB anisotropies, and supernova data simultaneously, including a time-variable equation of state, extending prior work
Provides an explicit treatment of survey data sets combined with dark energy parameter estimation, differing from previous studies
Both treat dark energy via an equation-of-state parameter within cosmological fits, with the newer paper broadening it into a component of total energy density budget constrained by additional data.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302218 (2003)from §§.§.§ Reparameterization
“w is the equation of state of the dark energy component, Ω=Ω_m+Ω_Λ and the radiation density parameter”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302207 (2003)from §Abstract
“This flat universe model is composed of 4.4%
baryons, 22% dark matter and 73% dark energy.
The dark energy equation of state is limited
to w < -0.78 (95%).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tighter constraints on the dark energy equation of state (w < -0.78, 95% CL) using first-year WMAP CMB data combined with other large-scale structure measures.
Presents a best-fit cosmological model with precise determination of the dark energy density fraction (73%) as part of a comprehensive parameter fit.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2003 The Three‐Dimensional Power Spectrum of Galaxi…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper simplifies the earlier parameterized equation-of-state treatment of dark energy into a general label for the acceleration-driving component within a flat cosmology assumption.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…baryonic wiggles in the galaxy power spectrum is presented by Percival et al. (2001) and Miller et al. (2001a,b, 2002), and cosmological models have been further constrained in conjunction with cosmic microwave background (CMB) data (e.g., Spergel et al. 2003; Verde et al. 2003; Lahav et al. 2002).”
“…it is well-known that luminous galaxies cluster more than dim ones (e.g., Davis et al. 1988; Hamilton 1988; Norberg et al. 2001; Zehavi et al. 2002; Verde et al. 2003), so when comparing P (k) on large and small scales we are in effect comparing apples with oranges, and may mistakenly conclude…”
“…constraints are crucially needed for breaking CMB degeneracies (Eisenstein et al. 1999; Efstathiou & Bond 1999; Bridle et al. 2003); for instance, WMAP alone is consistent with a closed universe with Hubble parameter h = 0.32 and no cosmological constant (Spergel et al. 2003; Verde et al. 2003).”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0302218 (2003)from §§.§.§ Reparameterization
“w is the equation of state of the dark energy component, Ω=Ω_m+Ω_Λ and the radiation density parameter”
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310725 (2003)from §Introduction
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
The newer paper broadens the earlier equation-of-state framework into a general review covering multiple theoretical models beyond just cosmological constant.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0307460 (2003)from §Introduction
“Under the premise of Friedmann equations,
this implies the existence of an energy component,
christened dark energy, with negative pressure <cit.>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Demonstrates that baryonic acoustic oscillations in large high-redshift galaxy surveys offer a precision route to measuring dark energy via H(z) and D_A(z)
Uses a full Fisher matrix formalism to treat cosmological constraints from large-scale structure, CMB anisotropies, and supernova data simultaneously, including a time-variable equation of state, extending prior work
Provides an explicit treatment of survey data sets combined with dark energy parameter estimation, differing from previous studies
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0982 (2008)from §Introduction
“The first is that 75%
of the energy density of the Universe exists in a new form with
large negative pressure, called dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Broadly reviews cosmic acceleration for the astronomy community, synthesizing observational evidence (SNe, CMB, LSS, clusters, weak lensing) and theoretical approaches (cosmological constant problem, dark energy models, modified gravity) into a unified treatment
Provides updated review of dark energy phenomenology and equation-of-state parameterizations (w0-wa) and their observational discrimination
Frames the deceleration/acceleration condition (p < -
ho/3, w<-1/3) as the defining property of dark energy
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper specializes dark energy into a parametrized equation-of-state framework (w), constraining it via specific observational probes, narrowing the general concept.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310725 (2003)from §Introduction
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0608632 (2006)from §Abstract
“Baryon oscillations are clearly detected and provide a robust measurement of the comoving distance
to the median survey redshift z=0.35 independent of curvature and dark energy properties.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Sharpens curvature constraint from WMAP alone (Ω_tot=1.05±0.05) to Ω_tot=1.003±0.010 using LRG power spectrum
Provides a measurement of the equation of state parameter w=-0.94±0.09 assuming flatness, independent of nonlinear scale complications
Demonstrates that baryon oscillation distance measurement to z=0.35 is robust and independent of assumptions about dark energy properties
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes dark energy from a simple accelerating component into a parameterized equation-of-state framework constrained by multiple datasets, though citation context is unclear.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…non-Gaussian signatures in the WMAP data in various forms (Chiang et al. 2003, 2007; Naselsky et al. 2007; Park 2004; de Oliveira-Costa et al. 2004; Tegmark et al. 2003; Larson & Wandelt 2004; Eriksen et al. 2004; Eriksen et al. 2004; Eriksen et al. 2004, 2007a; Copi et al. 2004; Schwarz et al.…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310725 (2003)from §Introduction
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2005 Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the L…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier notion of dark energy driving acceleration by adding quantitative constraints via equation-of-state parameter measurements.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310725 (2003)from §Introduction
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2009 Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Sloan Digi…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier generic dark-energy-driven-acceleration idea by adding a parameterized equation-of-state framework and new observational constraints (BAO, supernovae, CMB).— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310725 (2003)from §Introduction
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0907.1660 (2009)from §Introduction
““What is the nature of dark energy?” is one of the current key
questions in physical science.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tight, robust constraints on the dark energy equation of state w=-0.97±0.10 for a constant dark energy equation of state by combining BAO, supernova, and WMAP5 data.
Shows that the BAO distance constraint on Ω_m and H_0 is independent of the behaviour of dark energy at redshifts greater than those probed by the BAO and supernova measurements.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper specializes the general negative-pressure component into a specific equation-of-state parameterization (w) constrained by WMAP data, narrowing the earlier broad description.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310725 (2003)from §Introduction
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0586 (2008)from §Table of Cosmological parame…
“w Dark energy equation of state, w= p_DE/ρ_DE”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The five-year data improve constraints on cosmological parameters including dark energy equation of state, with the neutrino mass limit robust to within 10% to a varying dark energy equation of state.
Ω_Λ= 0.742±0.030 is measured with improved precision compared to three-year data.
The paper considers extended models with a constant dark energy equation of state w, bounded by w>-2.5, as part of testing extensions beyond simple ΛCDM.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2004 Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes dark energy from a generic negative-pressure component to a parameterized equation-of-state framework, adding quantitative constraints beyond the earlier flat-universe description.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0310725 (2003)from §Introduction
“have supported a flat dark-energy
dominated cosmology, as have angular clustering analyses of the
parent catalogs underlying the 2dFGRS (Efstathiou & Moody 2001)
and SDSS”
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0407372 (2004)from §Introduction
“A third theoretical prediction of departures from the standard model, and
one whose consequences would be particularly far reaching, is that
dark energy is not simply a cosmological constant introduced
already by Einstein, but something more complicated and dynamical in
nature.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We explore dark energy constraints in models with a fairly general time dependence of dark energy equation of state, finding Ω_λ=0.72± 0.02, w(z=0.3)=-0.98^+0.10_-0.12
One method to constrain the nature of dark energy that has not attracted much attention, yet has the potential to produce results on a relatively short time scale, is comparing measurements of amplitude of fluctuations at high redshift from the Lyα forest and CMB to that at low redshift from galaxy clustering.
We find no evidence for variation of the equation of state with redshift, w(z=1)=-1.03^+0.21_-0.28.
2005 The many lives of active galactic nuclei: cool…Cosmological constant background parameter
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper reduces the earlier general, possibly time-varying dark energy equation-of-state treatment to a fixed background Ω_Λ parameter for simulation input, without exploring its physical nature.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“We adopt cosmological parameter values consistent with a combined analysis of the 2-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) (Colless et al. 2001) and first-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data (Spergel et al. 2003; Seljak et al. 2005).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0407372 (2004)from §Introduction
“A third theoretical prediction of departures from the standard model, and
one whose consequences would be particularly far reaching, is that
dark energy is not simply a cosmological constant introduced
already by Einstein, but something more complicated and dynamical in
nature.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We explore dark energy constraints in models with a fairly general time dependence of dark energy equation of state, finding Ω_λ=0.72± 0.02, w(z=0.3)=-0.98^+0.10_-0.12
One method to constrain the nature of dark energy that has not attracted much attention, yet has the potential to produce results on a relatively short time scale, is comparing measurements of amplitude of fluctuations at high redshift from the Lyα forest and CMB to that at low redshift from galaxy clustering.
We find no evidence for variation of the equation of state with redshift, w(z=1)=-1.03^+0.21_-0.28.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0508046 (2005)from §Simulation characteristics
“Similarly, Ω_ b and Ω_Λ denote the densities of baryons
and dark energy at the present day.”
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier equation-of-state framework into a general negative-pressure category encompassing many dynamical models beyond a simple time-varying w.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0407372 (2004)from §Introduction
“A third theoretical prediction of departures from the standard model, and
one whose consequences would be particularly far reaching, is that
dark energy is not simply a cosmological constant introduced
already by Einstein, but something more complicated and dynamical in
nature.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We explore dark energy constraints in models with a fairly general time dependence of dark energy equation of state, finding Ω_λ=0.72± 0.02, w(z=0.3)=-0.98^+0.10_-0.12
One method to constrain the nature of dark energy that has not attracted much attention, yet has the potential to produce results on a relatively short time scale, is comparing measurements of amplitude of fluctuations at high redshift from the Lyα forest and CMB to that at low redshift from galaxy clustering.
We find no evidence for variation of the equation of state with redshift, w(z=1)=-1.03^+0.21_-0.28.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
The newer paper broadens dark energy's characterization to negative-pressure equation of state and surveys modified-gravity alternatives, building on the earlier BAO-based constraint approach.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The existence of dark energy has been confirmed by a number of observations – such as supernovae Ia (SN Ia) [490, 506, 507], large-scale structure (LSS) [577, 578], baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) [227, 487], and CMB [560, 561, 367].”
“From the joint analysis of Super-Nova Legacy Survey [39], BAO [227] and the CMB shift parameter [561], the constraints on two parameters n and β are n ∈ [−0.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
contestsdisputes● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.75
→2007 Extended theories of gravity and their cosmolo…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper challenges the need for dark energy as an exotic fluid, proposing curvature effects from extended gravity instead of the earlier equation-of-state approach.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
↓ contests
Later paper says · arXiv:0706.1146 (2007)from §Introduction
“If combined with constraints coming
from galaxy clusters on the matter density parameter Ω_M,
these data indicate that the Universe is dominated by a
non-clustered fluid with negative pressure, generically dubbed
dark energy, which is able to drive the accelerated
expansion.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes that dark energy and dark matter could be reinterpreted as 'shortcomings' of General Relativity rather than as real exotic components, and that extending gravity (via f(R) and scalar-tensor Extended Theories of Gravity) can reproduce accelerated expansion and other 'dark' phenomena as curvature effects.
Claims that dark energy and quintessence issues can be addressed as curvature effects within Extended Theories of Gravity, offering cosmological models fitted to observational data without adding unknown exotic ingredients to the cosmic pie.
Argues for changing the gravitational side of Einstein's equations (via non-linear Lagrangians) rather than the matter side, as a simpler alternative to invoking dark energy/dark matter.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 Dark Energy and the Accelerating UniverseNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier equation-of-state-focused probe into a fuller theoretical framework of dark energy, citing the earlier BAO measurement as supporting observational evidence.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Measurement of the BAO signature in the correlation function of Sloan Digitial Sky Survey (SDSS) luminous red galaxies (see Figure 5b) constrains the distance to redshift z = 0.35 to a precision of 5% (Eisenstein et al. 2005).”
“(b) Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the clustering of luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Eisenstein et al. 2005).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0982 (2008)from §Introduction
“The first is that 75%
of the energy density of the Universe exists in a new form with
large negative pressure, called dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Broadly reviews cosmic acceleration for the astronomy community, synthesizing observational evidence (SNe, CMB, LSS, clusters, weak lensing) and theoretical approaches (cosmological constant problem, dark energy models, modified gravity) into a unified treatment
Provides updated review of dark energy phenomenology and equation-of-state parameterizations (w0-wa) and their observational discrimination
Frames the deceleration/acceleration condition (p < -
ho/3, w<-1/3) as the defining property of dark energy
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper generalizes dark energy beyond the earlier's equation-of-state constraint framework to include a broader taxonomy of dynamical models and modified gravity.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2005 The Supernova Legacy Survey: measurement of $\…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the same equation-of-state framework, adding SNLS data and refining constraints on the dark energy component's properties.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“4 in Eisenstein et al. 2005).”
“…confidence levels for the fit to a flat (ΩM ,w) cosmology, from the SNLS Hubble diagram alone, from the SDSS baryon acoustic oscillations alone (Eisenstein et al. 2005), and the joint confidece contours.
quadratic terms in stretch or color to the distance estimator de-
creases the minimumχ2…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0510447 (2005)from §Introduction
“Surveys of cosmologically distant Type Ia supernovae
<cit.> indicated the presence of a
new, unaccounted-for “dark energy” that opposes the self-attraction
of matter and causes the expansion of the Universe to accelerate.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents distance measurements to 71 high redshift Type Ia supernovae from the first year of SNLS with improved systematic control
Provides cosmological fits yielding w = -1.023 ± 0.090 (stat) ± 0.054 (sys) for a flat cosmology with constant equation of state combined with SDSS baryon acoustic oscillation constraints
Claims improved systematic uncertainty control via single-instrument, multi-band photometry compared to traditional multi-telescope SN surveys
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2006 New<i>Hubble Space Telescope</i>Discoveries of…Negative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier equation-of-state constraint approach into a general negative-pressure framework, incorporating BAO data as one of several observational probes for candidate physical origins.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The distance ratio from z ¼ 0:35 to 1089: measured by the SDSS BAOs from Eisenstein et al. (2005):
R0:35¼ 0:35
E 0:35ð Þ Z 0:35 0 dz=E zð Þ½ 2=3ð Þ,Z 1089 0 dz=E zð Þ
¼ 0:0979 0:0036 1=3ð Þ:
Additional cosmological constraints exist, but in general provide less leverage and may be less robust than…”
“Additional, albeit more tentative, evidence is provided by observations of X-ray clusters (Allen et al. 2004) and baryon oscillations (e.g., Eisenstein et al. 2005).”
“; 1/zð Þ R z 0 dz0 /E z0ð Þ½ 2=3;where z¼0:35andA¼0:469 n/0:98ð Þ 0:35 0:017 from Eisenstein et al. (2005).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2011 Modified gravity and cosmologyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the earlier BAO-based dark energy constraints, incorporating them into broader analyses testing alternative gravity models against dark energy/ΛCDM.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Rydbeck, Fairnbairm and Goobar [1080] repeated the analysis of [467] by including SN-Ia data from ESSENCE [893, 1280], and constraints on the CMB shift parameter from WMAP-3 [1173] to disfavour the self-accelerating model at the 1 − 2σ level, depending on whether a peculiar velocity error on the SN-Ia data is included or not.”
“The inclusion of BAO data from [467] further supports this result.”
“This puts tension on the self-accelerating model, but as they point out, it is not necessarily reliable to use the BAO data for models other than ΛCDM, as ΛCDM is used throughout the analysis in [467].”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0501171 (2005)from §Introduction
“The nature of the “dark energy” causing this acceleration is a complete
mystery at present <cit.>,
but sorting between the various exotic explanations
will require superbly accurate data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides a geometric method (via the baryon acoustic peak) for measuring cosmological distance and thus constraining dark energy, complementary to luminosity-distance methods like Type Ia supernovae.
First clear detection of the late-time acoustic peak, enabling independent measurement of Ω_m and constraints on dark energy equation of state (w0) and curvature assuming dark energy is a cosmological constant.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1106.2476 (2011)from §Introduction
“More recently, `dark energy' has also been found to be required in
order to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the
Universe.”
The newer paper proposes modified gravity as an alternative to fluid-based dark energy models, challenging the exotic equation-of-state approach with a purely gravitational explanation.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0501025 (2005)from §Abstract
“The properties of future singularities are investigated in the universe
dominated
by dark energy including the phantom-type fluid.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We classify the finite-time singularities into four classes and explicitly present the models which give rise to these singularities by assuming the form of the equation of state of dark energy.
We show the existence of a stable fixed point with an equation of state w<-1 and numerically confirm that this is actually a late-time attractor in the phantom-dominated universe.
We also construct a phantom dark energy scenario coupled to dark matter that reproduces singular behaviors of the Big Rip type for the energy density and the curvature of the universe.
+3 more
↓ contests
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0601213 (2006)from §INTRODUCTION
“The dark energy problem (for recent review see <cit.>)
or, why current universe is expanding with the acceleration,
is considered to be the one of the most fundamental theoretical problems
of XXI century.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Reviews modified gravities (f(R), f(G), f(R,G), non-linear gravitational coupling, string-inspired Gauss-Bonnet-dilaton models) as gravitational alternatives to dark energy that can pass Solar System tests while producing rich late-time cosmology.
Shows such theories can naturally describe cosmological constant, quintessence, or phantom late-time eras with transition from deceleration to acceleration due to gravitational terms increasing as curvature decreases.
Proposes that the coincidence problem can be explained as a manifestation of universe expansion within modified gravity/non-linear coupling models.
+2 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2006 DYNAMICS OF DARK ENERGYNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier fluid/equation-of-state framework into a general category covering multiple dynamical models, generalizing rather than restricting or disputing it.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0501025 (2005)from §Abstract
“The properties of future singularities are investigated in the universe
dominated
by dark energy including the phantom-type fluid.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We classify the finite-time singularities into four classes and explicitly present the models which give rise to these singularities by assuming the form of the equation of state of dark energy.
We show the existence of a stable fixed point with an equation of state w<-1 and numerically confirm that this is actually a late-time attractor in the phantom-dominated universe.
We also construct a phantom dark energy scenario coupled to dark matter that reproduces singular behaviors of the Big Rip type for the energy density and the curvature of the universe.
+3 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the equation-of-state framing into a general negative-pressure acceleration mechanism and adds modified-gravity candidates beyond the constant-w constraint approach.}— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0608632 (2006)from §Abstract
“Baryon oscillations are clearly detected and provide a robust measurement of the comoving distance
to the median survey redshift z=0.35 independent of curvature and dark energy properties.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Sharpens curvature constraint from WMAP alone (Ω_tot=1.05±0.05) to Ω_tot=1.003±0.010 using LRG power spectrum
Provides a measurement of the equation of state parameter w=-0.94±0.09 assuming flatness, independent of nonlinear scale complications
Demonstrates that baryon oscillation distance measurement to z=0.35 is robust and independent of assumptions about dark energy properties
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2008 Dark Energy and the Accelerating UniverseNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the earlier w-based constraint framework into a general review of dark energy's nature, theoretical models, and cosmic role, building on its data constraints.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…Redshift Survey), and SNe Ia data, Spergel et al. (2007) yield w = −1.08 ± 0.12 and '0 = 1.026+0.016−0.015, whereas WMAP + SDSS only bounds H0 to the range 61 − 84 km/s/Mpc at 95% confidence (Tegmark et al. 2006), comparable to the accuracy of the HST Key Project measurement (Freedman et al. 2001).”
“CMB anisotropy is very sensitive to the expansion age; in combination with LSS measurements, it yields the tight constraint t0 = 13.8 ± 0.2 Gyr for a flat universe (Tegmark et al. 2006).”
“For this model, Tegmark et al. (2006) combined data from SDSS and WMAP to derive the constraints shown in the second column of Table 1.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0608632 (2006)from §Abstract
“Baryon oscillations are clearly detected and provide a robust measurement of the comoving distance
to the median survey redshift z=0.35 independent of curvature and dark energy properties.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Sharpens curvature constraint from WMAP alone (Ω_tot=1.05±0.05) to Ω_tot=1.003±0.010 using LRG power spectrum
Provides a measurement of the equation of state parameter w=-0.94±0.09 assuming flatness, independent of nonlinear scale complications
Demonstrates that baryon oscillation distance measurement to z=0.35 is robust and independent of assumptions about dark energy properties
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0982 (2008)from §Introduction
“The first is that 75%
of the energy density of the Universe exists in a new form with
large negative pressure, called dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Broadly reviews cosmic acceleration for the astronomy community, synthesizing observational evidence (SNe, CMB, LSS, clusters, weak lensing) and theoretical approaches (cosmological constant problem, dark energy models, modified gravity) into a unified treatment
Provides updated review of dark energy phenomenology and equation-of-state parameterizations (w0-wa) and their observational discrimination
Frames the deceleration/acceleration condition (p < -
ho/3, w<-1/3) as the defining property of dark energy
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2011 Modified gravity and cosmologyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens dark energy from a w-parameterized equation-of-state component to a general negative-pressure driver of acceleration, motivating modified gravity alternatives.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0608632 (2006)from §Abstract
“Baryon oscillations are clearly detected and provide a robust measurement of the comoving distance
to the median survey redshift z=0.35 independent of curvature and dark energy properties.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Sharpens curvature constraint from WMAP alone (Ω_tot=1.05±0.05) to Ω_tot=1.003±0.010 using LRG power spectrum
Provides a measurement of the equation of state parameter w=-0.94±0.09 assuming flatness, independent of nonlinear scale complications
Demonstrates that baryon oscillation distance measurement to z=0.35 is robust and independent of assumptions about dark energy properties
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1106.2476 (2011)from §Introduction
“More recently, `dark energy' has also been found to be required in
order to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the
Universe.”
The newer paper focuses on constraining specific equation-of-state parameters (constant w, w0/wa) using supernova data, narrowing the broad theoretical taxonomy of dark energy models to observational parameter estimation.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“While few dark energy theories givew 6= −1 and yet constant (Copeland et al. 2006), the constantw model is still useful to constrain as it contains fewer parametersthan
18
the dynamical dark energy models considered in the next section, and a value different from−1 would rule out the cosmological…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1105.3470 (2011)from §Abstract
“Fourteen of these pass our strict selection cuts
and are used in combination with the world's sample of to
derive the best current constraints on dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Adding these supernovae improves the best combined constraint on dark energy density, ρ_DE(z), at redshifts 1.0 < z < 1.6 by 18% (including systematic errors).
Nearly doubling the statistical weight of HST-discovered SNe Ia beyond z=1.
Corrects for the recently identified correlation between luminosity and host galaxy mass and corrects the NICMOS zeropoint at count rates appropriate for very distant SNe Ia.
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the broad dark energy category to a parametrized equation-of-state w(a) with observational constraints, focusing on the cosmological-constant special case.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…growing circle of ignorance (Weinberg
1989; Carroll et al. 1992; Sahni & Starobinsky 2000; Padmanabhan 2003; Peebles & Ratra 2003; Padmanabhan 2005; Copeland et al. 2006): physicists first struggled to understand why the cosmological constant or vacuum energy term was so close to zero, then to…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:hep-th/0603057 (2006)from §2.2 The evolution of the uni…
“In order to explain the current acceleration of the universe,
we require an exotic energy dubbed “dark energy”
with equation of state satisfying Eq. <ref>.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is a comprehensive review rather than a novel theoretical proposal, aiming to synthesize and compare a wide range of dark energy models (quintessence, k-essence, tachyon, phantom, dilatonic, coupled dark energy, braneworld, modified gravity) within a unified dynamical systems and perturbation-theory framework.
The review emphasizes cosmological scaling solutions and tracker behavior as organizing principles for classifying scalar-field dark energy models.
It presents reconstruction techniques for the dark energy equation of state using CMB, large-scale structure, and Supernovae Ia data.
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
2011 THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>CLUSTER SUPERN…
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper builds on the same dark energy/w framework, adding new high-z supernova data and constraints on possible time evolution (w0, wa) beyond the earlier characterization.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Keck AO Photometry
The photometry ofz > 1.2 SNe has been almost exclusively measured from HST images (Knop et al. 2003; Riess et al. 2004, 2007; Amanullah et al. 2010).”
“For the GOODS supernovae with NICMOS observations, we start with the original flux given by Riess et al. (2007) (after converting the magnitude measurements to fluxes using the given zeropoint of 22.92), but increase the flux by 0.01 magnitudes, representing half the correction for the (possible)…”
“The GOODS survey (Dickinson et al. 2003; Riess et al. 2004, 2007; Kuznetsova et al. 2008) is an example that provided a window to probe the high-z universe for studying galaxy evolution (e.g. Beckwith et al. 2006; Bouwens et al. 2006; Bundy et al. 2005) in addition toz > 1 SNe.”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1105.3470 (2011)from §Abstract
“Fourteen of these pass our strict selection cuts
and are used in combination with the world's sample of to
derive the best current constraints on dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Adding these supernovae improves the best combined constraint on dark energy density, ρ_DE(z), at redshifts 1.0 < z < 1.6 by 18% (including systematic errors).
Nearly doubling the statistical weight of HST-discovered SNe Ia beyond z=1.
Corrects for the recently identified correlation between luminosity and host galaxy mass and corrects the NICMOS zeropoint at count rates appropriate for very distant SNe Ia.
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2011 A 3% SOLUTION: DETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CON…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general dark-energy framework to constraining the single equation-of-state parameter w via H0 and CMB data, a special observational case.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Together with the present acceleration q0 = −0.55 and prior deceleration j0 = 1 (Riess et al. 2007), we find av = 0.697 ± 0.00201.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1103.2976 (2011)from §Abstract
“The improved measurement of
H_0, when combined with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)
7-year data, results in an improved constraint on the equation-of-state
parameter of dark energy of w = -1.08 ± 0.10.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides an improved, more precise measurement of H0 (3.3% uncertainty) that, combined with WMAP7 data, yields a tighter constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w than previous determinations.
Uses this improved H0 measurement to rule out the best-fitting gigaparsec-scale void models posited as an alternative to dark energy.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2010 SUPERNOVA CONSTRAINTS AND SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAIN…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the same w-parameterization but applies it specifically to Type Ia supernova distance measurements, restricting the broader theoretical framing to an observational SN-based subset.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Altogether, we are left with a sample of 14 HST SNe from z = 0.7− 1.4.”
“This update has almost no effect on the SNLS, SDSS, and low-z SNe, but does have some on the HST SNe, which are observed in the near-IR.”
“Before these corrections are applied, the HST SNe have unusually red colors and are significant outliers in the Hubble diagram.”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1104.1443 (2010)from §Introduction
“The fundamental nature of dark energy, which makes up 3/4 of the mass-energy budget of the universe, remains almost completely mysterious. A solid measurement that w
≠
-1 (which would rule out the cosmological constant) would have
profound implications for cosmology and particle physics.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is the first analysis to include light-curve model training systematics in the cosmological systematic error budget; previous analyses underestimated uncertainties by holding the light-curve model fixed.
The paper introduces a systematics covariance matrix approach (rather than the quadrature method) to properly propagate systematic uncertainties on dark energy constraints, including redshift dependence of these effects.
Presents SN-only cosmological constraints on the dark energy equation of state w from the largest joint SN sample to date (472 SNe) with detailed treatment of calibration and host-galaxy mass corrections.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper uses observational data to tightly constrain w and curvature, restricting the earlier broad exploration of dark energy candidates to a specific empirically bounded equation-of-state model near w=-1.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“The highz samples contain the Type Ia supernovae from the Hubble Space Telescope (Knop et al. 2003; Riess et al. 2004, 2007), the SuperNova Legacy Survey (SNLS) (Astier et al. 2006), the Equation of State: SupErNovae trace Cosmic Expansion (ESSENCE) survey (Wood-Vasey et al. 2007), as well as those used in the original papers of the discovery of the accelera…”
“For the “Alternative” compilation we have combined measurements from the Hubble Space Telescope (Riess et al. 2004, 2007), the SuperNova Legacy Survey (SNLS) (Astier et al. 2006), and the Equation of State: SupErNovae trace
Cosmic Expansion (ESSENCE) survey (Wood-Vasey et al. 2007), as well as some nearby Type Ia supernovae.”
“For the “Alternative” compilation we have combined measurements from the Hubble Space Telescope (Riess et al. 2004, 2007), the SuperNova Legacy Survey (SNLS) (Astier et al. 2006), and the Equation of State: SupErNovae trace
Cosmic Expansion (ESSENCE) survey (Wood-Vasey et al. 2007), as well as some…”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.72
→2009 IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the broad candidate space of dark energy models to specifically testing whether w=-1, focusing narrowly on cosmological constant consistency.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“On the time-evolution of 1+w, Riess et al. (2007) rule out rapidly evolving dark energy.”
“Rather, we use the ESSENCE (Miknaitis et al. 2007), SNLS (A06) and Higher-z samples (Riess et al. 2007) where we believe the systematics to be better controlled.”
“…element in the discovery that the universe is accelerating and dominated by dark energy (e.g., Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999; Knop et al. 2003; Tonry et al. 2003; Barris et al. 2004; Astier et al. 2006; Riess et al. 2007; Wood-Vasey et al. 2007; Davis et al. 2007; Kowalski et al. 2008).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0901.4804 (2009)from §Introduction
“They have been the key element in the
discovery that the universe is accelerating and dominated by dark energy
<cit.>. Observational efforts
have moved beyond merely establishing the existence of dark energy and are
focused on determining its simplest properties. This is most often done in
terms of the equation of state, p = wρ, where the equation of state
p…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Combines the new CfA3 SN Ia sample with literature samples (forming the 'Constitution' set) to produce improved, more precise constraints on the dark energy equation of state parameter w
Uses four independent light-curve fitters (SALT, SALT2, MLCS2k2 with two R_V values) to test for systematic differences affecting dark energy constraints, for the first time on a sample not used to train them
Identifies and quantifies specific systematic effects (host-galaxy extinction overestimation, Hubble residual trends, population differences by host morphology) that limit current dark energy measurements, reducing statistical uncertainty to the point where systematics dominate
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2016 A 2.4% DETERMINATION OF THE LOCAL VALUE OF THE…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper focuses specifically on constraining dark energy's equation-of-state via H0 tension and SNe Ia measurements, a narrower observational application of the broader theoretical framework.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Together with the present acceleration q0=−0.55 and prior deceleration j0=1 which can be measured via high-redshift SNe Ia (Riess et al. 2007; Betoule et al. 2014) independently of the CMB or BAO, we find for the primary fit aB=0.71273±0.00176, with the uncertainty in q0 contributing 0.1%…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1604.01424 (2016)from §Introduction
“A significant disagreement would provide evidence for fundamental physics beyond the standard model, such as time-dependent or early dark energy, gravitational physics beyond General Relativity, additional relativistic particles, or nonzero curvature.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The paper does not claim novelty in defining dark energy itself, but uses tension in H0 measurements as a potential probe of new dark energy physics (e.g., time-dependent or early dark energy) beyond the standard ΛCDM model.
The SH0ES program is explicitly named for its goal of constraining the equation of state of dark energy using supernovae and H0 measurements.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2009 FIRST-YEAR SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY-II SUPERNO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general dark-energy framework to concrete observational constraints on Ω_DE and w using specific SN Ia, BAO, and CMB datasets.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“For SDSS-II, ESSENCE, SNLS, and HST, at least one measurement is required before peak brightness (Trest < 0 days); for the nearby sample, at least one measurement is required with Trest < +5 days.”
“We have analyzed several different combinations of the five SN Ia data sets mentioned at the beginning of §5: SDSS-II, nearby (low-redshift), ESSENCE, SNLS, and HST.”
“For the SNLS sample, the salt–ii dispersion is significantly smaller than that from mlcs2k2, while for the HST sample the salt–ii dispersion is larger.”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0908.4274 (2009)from §Introduction
“Cosmic acceleration
is most commonly attributed to a new energy-density
component known as dark energy
(for a review, see <cit.>).
The recent SN measurements, in combination with measurements
of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in
galaxy clustering and of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
anisotropy, have provided increasingly
precise constr…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Use of detailed Monte Carlo simulations of all surveys to account for selection biases, including spectroscopic targeting, as a new feature in the analysis
Filling in the redshift 'desert' between low- and high-redshift SN Ia surveys with SDSS-II SN Survey data
Detailed comparison and systematic error analysis of mlcs2k2 vs salt-ii light-curve fitting methods, tracing discrepancies to rest-frame UV modeling and luminosity-color corrections
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2010 SPECTRA AND<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>LIGHT …Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper applies the same negative-pressure dark energy framework specifically to constrain w via SNe Ia distances, refining the earlier general survey into a focused observational measurement.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Revised HST zero-points and filter curves
Since Riess et al. (2007), the reported zero-points of both NICMOS and ACS were revised.”
“For example, two net SNe would have been cut from the Riess et al. (2007) sample with the SALT model.”
“Since we know the exact redshift and filters used in each observation, we can exactly calculate the amount of extinction already handled by the color correction (using our dµdzp values), without approximation.”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1004.1711 (2010)from §Abstract
“In particular, at z ≳ 1, the existence and nature
of dark energy are only weakly constrained by the data.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents new light curves and spectra of six SNe Ia discovered in 2001, including ground-based J-band photometry for two SNe with z>1
Combines these new SNe with other recent data into an improved compilation called Union2, consisting of 557 supernovae
Refits all light curves with the SALT2 fitter and improves handling of systematic errors compared to the earlier Union compilation
+1 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2014 Improved cosmological constraints from a joint…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper adopts the same w-parameterized dark energy framework but restricts focus to empirical SN Ia calibration and compilation without exploring physical origin candidates like the earlier paper.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“In the most sensitive bands (g, r, i), the uncertainties introduced in the calibration transfer are now typically smaller than the uncertainty in the HST flux standards (∼3 mmag); in other words, our calibration is now limited by the precision in the CALSPEC flux calibration.”
“The rest of our sample is taken from the compilation assembled in Conley et al. (2011), hereafter referred to as the “C11 compilation”, comprising SNe from SNLS, HST and several nearby experiments.”
“We use the interpretation of Riess et al. (2007) HST SN calibration described in C11, Sect.”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1401.4064 (2014)from §Introduction
“The reason for the acceleration remains unknown, and the term “dark
energy” is used to describe the
phenomenon.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
When combined with CMB constraints, we measure a constant dark-energy equation of state parameter w=-1.018 ± 0.057(stat+sys) for a flat universe.
Our supernova measurements provide the most stringent constraints to date on the nature of dark energy.
Section uses additional astrophysical probes in combination with SNe Ia to break degeneracies and constrain dark energy in more generic models.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2008 FIVE-YEAR<i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PRO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the broad negative-pressure dark energy concept to a specific cosmological constant/w parameter constrained by WMAP data, a special case application.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0586 (2008)from §Table of Cosmological parame…
“w Dark energy equation of state, w= p_DE/ρ_DE”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
The five-year data improve constraints on cosmological parameters including dark energy equation of state, with the neutrino mass limit robust to within 10% to a varying dark energy equation of state.
Ω_Λ= 0.742±0.030 is measured with improved precision compared to three-year data.
The paper considers extended models with a constant dark energy equation of state w, bounded by w>-2.5, as part of testing extensions beyond simple ΛCDM.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2007 Observational Constraints on the Nature of Dar…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper focuses specifically on constraining w via SN Ia data to test the cosmological constant case, narrowing the broader framework of candidate dark energy models.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0701041 (2007)from §Abstract
“We present constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter,
w=P/(ρ c^2),
using Type Ia supernovae from the ESSENCE supernova survey.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents first cosmological results from the ESSENCE survey constraining the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w with supernova data over redshift 0.15–0.70
Combines ESSENCE with SNLS to obtain a joint, tighter constraint on w and Ω_M consistent with a cosmological constant
Develops a redshift-dependent host-galaxy extinction prior ('glosz') derived from detailed Monte Carlo simulations of the ESSENCE selection function to reduce systematic bias in dark energy inference
+2 more
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2012 NINE-YEAR <i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general negative-pressure/candidate-model framework to a specific parametrized Ω_Λ, w0, wa observational constraint using CMB, BAO, and SNe data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…supernovae with 123 SNe at low redshift (Hamuy et al. 1996; Riess et al. 1999; Jha et al. 2006; Hicken et al. 2009; Contreras et al. 2010), 93 SNe from the SDSS supernovae search (Holtzman et al. 2008), and 14 SNe at z > 1 from HST measurements by Riess et al. (2007) to form a sample of 472 SNe.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1212.5226 (2012)from §Introduction
“Despite its notable success at describing all current cosmological data sets, the standard model raises many questions: what is the nature of dark matter and dark energy?”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Nine-year WMAP data combined with high-l CMB, BAO, and H0 determine Ω_bh^2, Ω_ch^2, and Ω_Λ each to ~1.5% precision
Restricting supernova data use to models examining the dark energy equation of state due to residual systematic errors in SN samples
Updated methodology for combining WMAP with SPT/ACT/BAO/H0/SNe to constrain dark energy equation of state parameters (w, w0, wa) more tightly than previous WMAP releases
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.60
→2008 FIVE-YEAR <i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PR…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the broad negative-pressure/candidate-origin framework to the specific ΛCDM case, treating dark energy via Ω_Λ and w within a flat cosmological-constant model.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…(Percival et al. 2001; Tegmark et al. 2004; Cole et al. 2005; Tegmark et al. 2006; Eisenstein et al. 2005; Percival et al. 2007; Astier et al. 2006; Riess et al. 2007; Wood-Vasey et al. 2007) have established ΛCDM as the standard model of cosmology: a flat universe dominated by dark energy,…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0611572 (2006)from §Introduction
“The accelerating cosmic expansion first inferred from observations
of distant type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia; Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter
et al. 1999) indicates unexpected gravitational physics, frequently
attributed to the dominating presence of a “dark energy” with
negative pressure.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides the first meaningful constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at z ≥ 1
Shows the defining property of dark energy, its negative pressure, appears to be present at z>1, in the epoch preceding acceleration, with ~98% confidence
Rules out rapidly evolving dark energy (dw/dz >> 1) using the expanded high-redshift SN Ia sample
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0732 (2008)from §Abstract
“We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant)
dark energy equation of state and the spatial curvature of the
universe:”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Provides tight, simultaneous limits on the constant dark energy equation of state (w) and spatial curvature using 5-year WMAP data combined with other measurements.
Combines WMAP acoustic scale measurements with BAO to accurately measure the geometry of the universe and properties of dark energy, showing consistency with a cosmological constant.
Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper reduces the earlier broad phenomenological/geometrical DE framework to a simple equation-of-state parameter w constrained observationally, a narrower operational treatment.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…& Cahn 2007; Upadhye 2007; Zhang et al. 2007; Yamamoto et al. 2007; Chiba & Takahashi 2007; Bean et al. 2007; Hu & Sawicki 2007; Song et al. 2007; Starobinsky 2007; Daniel et al. 2008; Jain & Zhang 2008; Bertschinger & Zukin 2008; Amin et al. 2008; Hu 2008) and determine the mass of neutrinos…”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:0706.2041 (2007)from §Introduction
“Continuing investigation of dark energy (DE) properties in the Universe
(see the recent review <cit.> for the definitions of what is usually
called the effective DE energy density ρ_DE and pressure p_DE
from the observational point of view) has shown that its properties are
very close to those of an exact cosmological constant Λ that has
ρ_Λ= - p_Λ= Λ/8π G=c…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Proposes a new class of f(R) gravity models that produce viable cosmology different from ΛCDM at recent times while satisfying cosmological, Solar system, and laboratory tests
Introduces the 'disappearing cosmological constant' concept: f(0)=0 so the cosmological constant vanishes in flat spacetime but appears effectively in curved spacetime for large R
Identifies a new problem for f(R)-based dark energy models: possible overproduction of massive scalar particles (scalarons) in the early Universe
+2 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
The newer paper broadens the earlier equation-of-state-focused constraint into a general review covering multiple theoretical models beyond just cosmological constant testing.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0701041 (2007)from §Abstract
“We present constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter,
w=P/(ρ c^2),
using Type Ia supernovae from the ESSENCE supernova survey.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents first cosmological results from the ESSENCE survey constraining the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w with supernova data over redshift 0.15–0.70
Combines ESSENCE with SNLS to obtain a joint, tighter constraint on w and Ω_M consistent with a cosmological constant
Develops a redshift-dependent host-galaxy extinction prior ('glosz') derived from detailed Monte Carlo simulations of the ESSENCE selection function to reduce systematic bias in dark energy inference
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:0803.0982 (2008)from §Introduction
“The first is that 75%
of the energy density of the Universe exists in a new form with
large negative pressure, called dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Broadly reviews cosmic acceleration for the astronomy community, synthesizing observational evidence (SNe, CMB, LSS, clusters, weak lensing) and theoretical approaches (cosmological constant problem, dark energy models, modified gravity) into a unified treatment
Provides updated review of dark energy phenomenology and equation-of-state parameterizations (w0-wa) and their observational discrimination
Frames the deceleration/acceleration condition (p < -
ho/3, w<-1/3) as the defining property of dark energy
+1 more
extendsbuilds on / generalises● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2011 Modified gravity and cosmologyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper broadens the equation-of-state-focused dark energy concept into a general energy component motivating modified gravity, generalizing rather than contesting or renaming it.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:astro-ph/0701041 (2007)from §Abstract
“We present constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter,
w=P/(ρ c^2),
using Type Ia supernovae from the ESSENCE supernova survey.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Presents first cosmological results from the ESSENCE survey constraining the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w with supernova data over redshift 0.15–0.70
Combines ESSENCE with SNLS to obtain a joint, tighter constraint on w and Ω_M consistent with a cosmological constant
Develops a redshift-dependent host-galaxy extinction prior ('glosz') derived from detailed Monte Carlo simulations of the ESSENCE selection function to reduce systematic bias in dark energy inference
+2 more
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1106.2476 (2011)from §Introduction
“More recently, `dark energy' has also been found to be required in
order to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the
Universe.”
The newer paper focuses specifically on constraining the equation-of-state parameter w (and its evolution) rather than the broader review of dark energy models and evidence in the earlier paper.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“…high-z Type Ia supernovae have been the most powerful data for first discovering the existence of dark energy (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999) and then constraining the properties of dark energy, such as the equation of state parameter, w (see Frieman et al. 2008, for a recent review).”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:0803.0982 (2008)from §Introduction
“The first is that 75%
of the energy density of the Universe exists in a new form with
large negative pressure, called dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Broadly reviews cosmic acceleration for the astronomy community, synthesizing observational evidence (SNe, CMB, LSS, clusters, weak lensing) and theoretical approaches (cosmological constant problem, dark energy models, modified gravity) into a unified treatment
Provides updated review of dark energy phenomenology and equation-of-state parameterizations (w0-wa) and their observational discrimination
Frames the deceleration/acceleration condition (p < -
ho/3, w<-1/3) as the defining property of dark energy
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.62
→2009 FIRST-YEAR SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY-II SUPERNO…Cosmological constant as dark energy equation of state
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper restricts the general dark-energy concept to a specific observational parametrization (Ω_DE, w) constrained via SN Ia, BAO, and CMB data.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“Simulation of Survey Search Efficiency
The final step in the simulation is to model losses related to the SN search.”
“In §2, we briefly describe the operation and data processing for the SDSS-II SN Survey, which have been more extensively described in Sako et al. (2008).”
“On most of the usable observing nights in the period 1 September through 30 November 2005, the SDSS-II SN Survey scanned a region (designated stripe 82) centered on the celestial equator in the Southern Galactic hemisphere that is 2.5◦ wide and runs between right ascensions of 20hr and 4hr, covering a total area of 300 sq. deg.”
+1 more citing passage(s)
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:0803.0982 (2008)from §Introduction
“The first is that 75%
of the energy density of the Universe exists in a new form with
large negative pressure, called dark energy.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Broadly reviews cosmic acceleration for the astronomy community, synthesizing observational evidence (SNe, CMB, LSS, clusters, weak lensing) and theoretical approaches (cosmological constant problem, dark energy models, modified gravity) into a unified treatment
Provides updated review of dark energy phenomenology and equation-of-state parameterizations (w0-wa) and their observational discrimination
Frames the deceleration/acceleration condition (p < -
ho/3, w<-1/3) as the defining property of dark energy
+1 more
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:0908.4274 (2009)from §Introduction
“Cosmic acceleration
is most commonly attributed to a new energy-density
component known as dark energy
(for a review, see <cit.>).
The recent SN measurements, in combination with measurements
of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in
galaxy clustering and of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
anisotropy, have provided increasingly
precise constr…”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Use of detailed Monte Carlo simulations of all surveys to account for selection biases, including spectroscopic targeting, as a new feature in the analysis
Filling in the redshift 'desert' between low- and high-redshift SN Ia surveys with SDSS-II SN Survey data
Detailed comparison and systematic error analysis of mlcs2k2 vs salt-ii light-curve fitting methods, tracing discrepancies to rest-frame UV modeling and luminosity-color corrections
The newer paper broadens the earlier equation-of-state formalism into a general framework including modified-gravity and scalar-field alternatives beyond the cosmological constant case.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:0803.0547 (2008)from §Abstract
“We also constrain
models of dark energy via its equation of state, parity-violating
interaction, and neutrino properties such as mass and the number of species.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
We obtain tight, simultaneous limits on the (constant) equation of state of dark energy and the spatial curvature of the universe: -0.14<1+w<0.12 and -0.0179<Ω_k<0.0081.
We provide a set of “distance priors,” to test a variety of dark energy models with spatial curvature.
We test a time-dependent w with a present value constrained as -0.33<1+w_0<0.21 (95% CL).
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
The newer paper broadens the earlier equation-of-state characterization by surveying additional theoretical candidates like f(R) gravity and quintessence beyond constant/evolving w.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1002.4928 (2010)from §Introduction
“The unknown component giving
rise to this late-time cosmic acceleration is called dark
energy <cit.> (see <cit.> for reviews).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This review puts more weight on observational and experimental aspects of f(R) theories compared to other review articles, which is particularly useful to place constraints on inflation and dark energy models based on f(R) theories.
The paper reviews and systematizes conditions for cosmological viability of f(R) dark energy models and their compatibility with local gravity constraints, including the chameleon mechanism.
It reviews viable f(R) dark energy models that satisfy both cosmological and local gravity constraints, distinguishing them from earlier models (e.g., f(R)=R-\alpha/R^n) shown to be unstable or incompatible with matter domination.
narrowsrestricts to a special case● verifiedthe tool’s confidence in the link type: 0.55
→2011 Modified gravity and cosmologyNegative-pressure component driving cosmic acceleration
What the later paper did with the concept
The newer paper simplifies dark energy to a generic negative-pressure component motivating modified gravity, dropping the earlier detailed w0/wa equation-of-state parameterization.— the tool’s reading
The later paper’s own words, from the sentence where it cites the earlier one. Supplied by Semantic Scholar, so we could not check it against our own copy of the paper.
“• Measurements of the CMB anisotropies from large to small scales [732, 442], combined with measurements of galaxy clustering from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) [1058], greatly favour a model with ΩΛ = 0.”
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1001.4538 (2010)from §Abstract
“The limit on a constant dark energy equation of state
parameter from +BAO+H_0, without high-redshift Type Ia
supernovae, is
w = -1.10±0.14 (68% CL).”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
Improved constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w and its time-dependent parameterization (w0, wa) using the combination of 7-year WMAP data with BAO, H0, supernova, and time-delay distance measurements.
First use of a lens time-delay distance measurement (D_Δt) in combination with WMAP data to constrain dark energy properties.
↓ narrows
Later paper says · arXiv:1106.2476 (2011)from §Introduction
“More recently, `dark energy' has also been found to be required in
order to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the
Universe.”
The newer paper broadens the equation-of-state framing into a general negative-pressure component motivating modified gravity, building on the earlier characterization.— the tool’s reading
How each paper defines the concept
Earlier paper says · arXiv:1104.1443 (2010)from §Introduction
“The fundamental nature of dark energy, which makes up 3/4 of the mass-energy budget of the universe, remains almost completely mysterious. A solid measurement that w
≠
-1 (which would rule out the cosmological constant) would have
profound implications for cosmology and particle physics.”
What it contributed · in the tool’s words, not the paper’s
This is the first analysis to include light-curve model training systematics in the cosmological systematic error budget; previous analyses underestimated uncertainties by holding the light-curve model fixed.
The paper introduces a systematics covariance matrix approach (rather than the quadrature method) to properly propagate systematic uncertainties on dark energy constraints, including redshift dependence of these effects.
Presents SN-only cosmological constraints on the dark energy equation of state w from the largest joint SN sample to date (472 SNe) with detailed treatment of calibration and host-galaxy mass corrections.
↓ extends
Later paper says · arXiv:1106.2476 (2011)from §Introduction
“More recently, `dark energy' has also been found to be required in
order to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the
Universe.”